Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

I like how calmly and firm he just put that out there. No Trump exclamations or phrases, just straightforward "You mess with us, you get bombed."

I don't know if I should be scared or amazed.

This is how a leader should be.
Obama was silently drone striking children, whilst smiling and crying his one eyed tears over Sandy Hook "victims", whereas Trump jumps on Twitter and just tells a foreign military "fire and be fired upon." No fake tears or dead kids need apply.
 
I'm still wondering how trump's gonna be viewed years after he's out of office. Wonder if this thread would still be around when trump's out of office
One day when I'm super bored and Trump's out of office, I'm gonna read this entire thread to see the timeline of things.
maybe it should by physically recorded and preserved for future generations as the most in depth look into the drumpf presidency.
 
I feel you. My group of friends is banned from talking about politics since it always ends in a screaming match. If you aren't in 100% agreement (which I'm not since I doubt that we have laid the groundwork for the systems liberals want) then you are clearly some degenerate backwards fuck.

Nah, it is the media's fault and the conditioning society has put into people that there is only one way forward and it must be achieved ruthlessly.

Then people wonder why there isn't trust in society.

I'm with you the liberals have branded themselves the party of science and through years of the Daily show, real time, etc they've had it reinforced that not only are they the party of science but they are the party of the inteligent. Think of the times they'll quote studies saying more liberals go to college, it's funny because those studies show republicans have higher IQ's on average, It's why they always go back to the republicans are dumb rednecks it's what they've been taught.
 
This is how a leader should be.
Obama was silently drone striking children, whilst smiling and crying his one eyed tears over Sandy Hook "victims", whereas Trump jumps on Twitter and just tells a foreign military "fire and be fired upon." No fake tears or dead kids need apply.
Are you saying your issue with Obama drone striking Iran was not because of "dead kids" or "brown person killing brown people" but rather he didn't announce it?

I'll give you points for consistency. I could care less about Iran at this point.
 
But there will probably be a bit of reaganing too, as they chip away at his successful legacy in pop culture, until the common wisdom is that Obama fixed the economy and Trump rode his coattails.

Uhm, sweatie, everyone knows it was Obama's economy right until the start of the lockdown, then for no apparent reason the consequences of the MAGA chud administration started appearing to show how unfit he is for the job. Drumpf was only taking credit for the hard work of a black man like the racist sexist transphobe shitlord he is. Maybe try to educate yourself by watching CNN or following political hot takes by blue checkmarks on Twitter before looking like an idiot online? 🤷‍♀️
#Resist #VoteBlueNoMatterWho #NotMyPresident #Bernie2024 #StaceyAbrams4VP
 
Are you saying your issue with Obama drone striking Iran was not because of "dead kids" or "brown person killing brown people" but rather he didn't announce it?

I'll give you points for consistency. I could care less about Iran at this point.
No my issue is that he didn't get enough dead brown kids in the sandbox.
 
Are you saying your issue with Obama drone striking Iran was not because of "dead kids" or "brown person killing brown people" but rather he didn't announce it?

I'll give you points for consistency. I could care less about Iran at this point.
It's an example of Obama's consistent hypocrisy.

Claim that the Feds won't be shutting down weed business that comply with state law in legal states then hammering them worse than W did.

Or from a speech in '04 "There's not a black America and white America and Latino America and Asian America; there's the United States of America." then call a cop stupid for stopping a black guy from breaking and entering into a house as if the cop was supposed to know the owner of every house, or "If I had a son he would look like Trayvon", those examples are endless.

Or the DACA stuff while calling everyone who didn't agree a racist at the same time he was putting children in literal cages and deporting more people than ever before.

The anti war rhetoric about the endless middle east wars, then the destruction of Libya causing a mass influx of migrants into Europe.

If you actually look back (or remember) the only thing consistent about Obama was the inconsistency.
TDS all you want but no one can legitimately claim that they don't know what Trump would say/do on any particular issue.
Issue-'Murica, fuck off China and the UN.
 
No my issue is that he didn't get enough dead brown kids in the sandbox.

Killing and maiming little kids is how you recruit even more Akbars. You're always going to have some, I know, but doing this to kids:

dr_2095816b.jpg

And practicing 'double tapping' drone strikes where you kill first responders tends to make more of them.
 
Killing and maiming little kids is how you recruit even more Akbars. You're always going to have some, I know, but doing this to kids:

Wyświetl załącznik 1247797

And practicing 'double tapping' drone strikes where you kill first responders tends to make more of them.
Am I not allowed to be facetious? Of course I'm against drone strikes. I'm a bigger fan of more precise attacks like the one against the austere scholar Salami and the raid on Osama bun Laden.
 
If people were really empathetic they'd realize that even if they don't agree with the methods, the protestors are anxious about what they're going to do to make ends meet and "well those stupid poors just need to wait for their betters to eat the rich!" is both patronizing and unrealistic.

The narrative is almost certainly going to recalibrate to Trump FORCING Dem governors into long draconian lockdowns that destroyed the economy because his initial response to the pandemic was just so bad that they had no other choice.
 
Interesting. TDS can't last forever, it's why i asked if this thread would still exist or eventually get locked in the future

A show about Jesus literally represented Obama as Satan.


Obama derangement exists but it just isn't as pronounced anymore. I think this stuff dies hard with new presidents. Polling shows that Bush and Obama are popular. It's likely that Trump will be the same if you doesn't botch the pandemic any further.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
A show about Jesus literally represented Obama as Satan.


Obama derangement exists but it just isn't as pronounced anymore. I think this stuff dies hard with new presidents.

The show was shit, but it didn't cast Obama as Satan. The guy is a creepy looking dude who has been cast as el Diablo long before Obama was elected.

The show was actually woke and made Samson a black man, among other things.
1C6685885-130328-Bible_Samson-5p.jpg
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
You don't need to be an expert in submarines to figure out that a diesel-electric submarine from the 1960s is probably not going to be very quiet.

Diesel submarines can actually run much quieter than nuclear ones for short periods, it's one of the very few advantages they actually have. As I understand it for short periods they can switch over and run only on battery power, leaving the engine totally silent, whereas a nuclear sub's reactor always has to be on. It's one reason the Navy still occasionally runs nuclear-versus-diesel wargames.

But that presumes having someone competent in the diesel sub's operation, which... eh?
 
54e64e7bd68d41ba8c3cc339b6b719b3.png


The Speaker of the House determines when the Congress is or is not in session. If she's not reconvening the Congress, then she's refusing to come back from vacation. This is not a difficult equation if you're not a journalist. (A)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wyświetl załącznik 1248166

The Speaker of the House determines when the Congress is or is not in session. If she's not reconvening the Congress, then she's refusing to come back from vacation. This is not a difficult equation if you're not a journalist.
Also it's dirt simple to reconvene even if you want to avoid spreading a disease by gathering your congress. Just make like a super big Discord or something if you really don't want to be in coofing distance.

Nancy's just a lazy ice cream eating bitch with a low IQ.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 1248166

The Speaker of the House determines when the Congress is or is not in session. If she's not reconvening the Congress, then she's refusing to come back from vacation. This is not a difficult equation if you're not a journalist.
I can find literally nobody on the replies defending it right now. There was one guy, but when the facts were presented to him his only response was "Jesus".
 
Diesel submarines can actually run much quieter than nuclear ones for short periods, it's one of the very few advantages they actually have. As I understand it for short periods they can switch over and run only on battery power, leaving the engine totally silent, whereas a nuclear sub's reactor always has to be on. It's one reason the Navy still occasionally runs nuclear-versus-diesel wargames.

But that presumes having someone competent in the diesel sub's operation, which... eh?
Oh yeah! I remember watching a documentary about that!


I can find literally nobody on the replies defending it right now. There was one guy, but when the facts were presented to him his only response was "Jesus".

Dude you gotta grab and show us that shit man.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The Iranian naval composition is full of "kilo-class submarines." IE: Retrofitted, Cold War-era, diesel-powered submarines. You don't need to be an expert in submarines to figure out that a diesel-electric submarine from the 1960s is probably not going to be very quiet.

Small point of order.
Kilos are from the 80s, and A properly maintained Kilo-class running on batteries is extremely silent. It is a rare case of the soviets building something that works and doing it correctly.
The soviets when the kilo was created realized they could not keep pace with America weapons development, so instead designed their platforms for single-puprose responses: be better than the Americans at one thing, and hope it'd be enough. (The Mig-25 is an example of this: the MiG-25 had speed and altitude performance that would allow it intercept bombers, but almost no range or dogfight capabilities.)

In the case of the Kilo, they needed a silent Hunter-Killer to counter American missile submarines (and shipping to a lesser degree) close to Russia.

The tl;dr was the Kilo Class is an attack sub meant to operate in waters where Russia had at least nominal control. You'd either be in port or on manuvers using diesel, not giving too many fucks about giving away your approximate position. When shit hit the fan you dive, go to batteries, and be nearly invisibile. The soviets put their R&D budget into acoustic paneling instead of advanced propulsion; if you were a Kilo captain and involved in a war with the Americans, you either won in which case you could safely surface and run on diesel, or you lost in which case home port was likely a radioactive crater even if you survived.


That doesn't mean Iran Kilos would be much of a threat, though.
a) Advances in active and passive sonar
b) They are almost assuredly not properly maintained.
c) Crew training is probably not great.
d) The US Navy likely knows exactly where the 3 iranian subs are at all times. Even if the sub goes dead silent, it has limited range & dive time. The Kilo was not designed to be more than a kamikaze in an attack scenario where the enemy holds the surface - especially in the comparatively shallow waters of the persian gulf.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole