- Dołączono
- 17 Kwi 2014
Ÿoure saying you have lonely sheep that need husbands?
No we have a whole subforum about sheepfuckers Holden is insane scum even with loveshy and wizard.
💊 Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge
- Twórca wątku Saney
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Status
No we have a whole subforum about sheepfuckers Holden is insane scum even with loveshy and wizard.
- Dołączono
- 9 Sty 2015
But he mentioned horses, not sheep. (Citation needed) I guess it's because horses have long dancers legs. 
- Dołączono
- 10 Kwi 2013
Yup. The question was asked here:
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/marijan-Šiklić-thatincelblogger.6576/page-142#post-446663
And he responded here:
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/marijan-Šiklić-thatincelblogger.6576/page-146
@Holden confirmed for liking the cock (as long as it's in a dress).
- Dołączono
- 15 Kwi 2014
And you're a cowardly idiot who refused to answer any of my other points. Where are your sources where western women worship abuse? Cite 'em.
So can you tell me how my relationship is wrong? Mr. Owl hasn't beat me, yet I'm still with him, obviously disproving your theory wrong.
- Dołączono
- 23 Cze 2013
One of the biggest logical flaws in Holden's worldview is that he assumes that somebody who doesn't immediately leave an abusive relationship must be 100% OK with being abused, as opposed to trapped, isolated, confused or just scared.
- Dołączono
- 4 Lut 2013
Oh my, stupid @Holden is shifting the burden of proof again! It's a logical fallacy that hasn't worked once for him, otherwise he'd have legitimate followers or at least SOMEONE here to agree with any of the stupid, baseless ramblings he constantly types in fits of anger.
Look at all the graphic attention he goes into when describing "maiming", "chopping in half", "gouging eyes", "smashing teeth". I bet his micro-dick is nice and stiff just thinking about hurting women, who he clearly views as property and not autonomous beings that can (hilariously and justly) reject his lazy, sissy, abusive, hihihihihi ass.
Look at all the graphic attention he goes into when describing "maiming", "chopping in half", "gouging eyes", "smashing teeth". I bet his micro-dick is nice and stiff just thinking about hurting women, who he clearly views as property and not autonomous beings that can (hilariously and justly) reject his lazy, sissy, abusive, hihihihihi ass.
- Dołączono
- 3 Sty 2014
That's not a penis, it's a skin tag.
- Dołączono
- 15 Kwi 2014
In the context of this conversation, yes, I want some damn definitive evidence. There has to be conclusive evidence to prove why women love rapists and worship abuse. It's one of the things you always say what women want, and it's one of the reasons why you come here to argue your stupid, insane point across despite being proven wrong time and time again.
If your claims that women love rape are proven correct, then it would only help your cause wouldn't it? When I ask for evidence, all you did was pull a straw man and claim it was "abhorrent to the mainstream." Consensual loving relationships are mainstream, raping isn't.
I was asking how women worship abuse with facts, and you immediately dismiss it like the cowardly Fuckbot that you are. Burden of proof, bitch. Prove it.
- Dołączono
- 17 Gru 2013
Neither do you.
Holy wait what?
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 20 Gru 2014
Excuse me! I'm British and I've been fucking demanding he cite some sources* for months now...
*and I really want** sources that don't go proving him wrong... surely if he was right he'd not be able to find sources that just keep on showing him to be making shit up all the time...
**On the other hand, I'm very welcoming of the sources he currently provides... there is nothing more hilarious than when he proves himself wrong... again...
Holy wait what?
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 20 Gru 2014
Remember that 25% of women NEVER got married stuff? Yeah, you got Citations out the fucking arse for that one.
Remember that "needs evidence to convict, not just a claim?" shit? YOU provided a fucking citation and a half that proved that one...
Remember when you claimed you never had any violent fantasies about women? Yeah, so do we and we provided yet another citation showing you to be lying out of your fucking arse AND not understanding English that well. Remember, I have a quote bag with your name on it... so we have more than enough proof of what you've claimed...
and...
...
Of course, the best thing about you and citations is it's not that we're making counter claims... we're asking you to provide some fucking evidence for your claims! Until you do, we're rejecting them... the burden of proof is not on us to show you're wrong, it's on you to prove that you are right!
Yes, you use assertions based on the conclusions you believe your claims lead to... as evidence that your claims are correct. I don't know if you've ever heard of this little thing called Circular Reasoning? It's all the rage in groups where they can't provide any evidence for their claims...
And now you need to provide evidence for all those claims... or, in short, fucking well prove it!
Actually, no... you've just committed another fallacy...
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/black-or-white
I'm really starting to wonder if you even know what Logic and Reasoning are... because you sure seem very oblivious regarding the concept...
- Dołączono
- 21 Lis 2014
All these addresses from Holden to other users, and not one for me. I'm starting to think I hurt his feelings with my previous post. Yet I feel no repercussive emotions. Don't take that personally, Holden. I happen to be a sociopath. It's not you, it's me.
...Have you ever heard that prior sentence from a female before, or do they have no qualms about telling you the truth to your face orally?
...Have you ever heard that prior sentence from a female before, or do they have no qualms about telling you the truth to your face orally?
- Dołączono
- 4 Lut 2013
Holdy admitting he has no proof (from the thread about his wiki article, emphasis added):
My "insane" response, which earned me getting blocked by him:
My "insane" response, which earned me getting blocked by him:
- Dołączono
- 17 Kwi 2014
Hence his crush on @NobleGrayHorse, confirmed for brony.But he mentioned horses, not sheep. (Citation needed) I guess it's because horses have long dancers legs.
@Holden she is not actually a horse, I've never heard of a talking horse.
- Dołączono
- 3 Sty 2014
ib4 Holden makes some insulting comment while totally ignoring that he just got his ass handed to him for, yet again, making a hyperbolic assertion in a serious discussion.
- Dołączono
- 17 Mar 2013
Man Jam, if you really knew anything about citations you'd know that you don't have to cite common knowledge. For example, I can say "water is wet" without being expected to cite a peer-reviewed journal entry about why it is wet. We also can say "beating and raping women is bad" without having to cite anything because the academic community universally recognizes beating and raping as bad things.
The burden of providing proof is on you, not us, because you're the one trying to go against the academic norm.
- Dołączono
- 17 Kwi 2014
Citation needed.
- Dołączono
- 4 Lut 2013
It's funny how little he knows about rationality and reason. That, or he's just clinging so desperately to his little conspiracy that he posits all these flimsy and incompetent logical fallacies to avoid confronting just how terribly stupid everything he believes actually is.
Now that I think about it, both of the above are probably true. Ha. So much fail.
Now that I think about it, both of the above are probably true. Ha. So much fail.
- Dołączono
- 17 Gru 2014
Macie, I got to question 1 you posed and it was already hilarious. If you can't get what you're asking there by now then you're fucking crazy. Oh. Which I told you many times before.
- Status