- Dołączono
- 24 Kwi 2017
He always looks and moves like the dames you get in UK pantomimes - men in drag. yaniv looked bow legged in that vid, I had visions of him wearing a pad or two.
Yaniv's weapon charges appearance 12/5
- Twórca wątku Questionable Ceviche
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Status
NoSpiceLife
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 2 Lip 2019
So the behaviour of a politician almost?
I should have quoted the comment, someone mentioned the mess Canada is in and questioned why no one is doing anything about it.
If you were a candidate for running the country, would you want to be the one to try and fix the mess that Trudeau has made, it's the only reason he keeps getting back in, no one in their right mind would take on the job, they'd just end up killing themselves in this climate.
So glad to see the judge saw sense with the publication ban, it's insane that a Canadian courts of law have become a clown courts.
Although I'm highly suspect that there are many brown paper bags, maybe the judges are setting this all up for a massive precedent that will stop all of this insanity in it's tracks?
- Dołączono
- 29 Sie 2017
He is pigeon-toed. There are plenty of videos and photos out there of it.
- Dołączono
- 31 Lip 2019
I think he also has contracted tendons or something similar, he has a pretty classic toe-walking gait. I don't know if this is related to pigeon-toes.
Like many men who cosplay at being women, he has failed to ascertain a key element of presenting as female, which involves shifting the weight back and pushing the hips forward. Women VERY seldom lurch around leading with the head/chest like brawlers.
- Dołączono
- 25 Lip 2019
Jessica Yaniv appears in court, confronts Post Millennial reporter
Jessica Yaniv appeared in court today where she accused a Post Millennial reporter of taking photographs of her in the women’s washroom during recess.
www.thepostmillennial.com
BREAKING: Jessica Yaniv appears in court, confronts Post Millennial r…
archived 13 Jan 2020 23:51:55 UTC
edit to add archive
- Dołączono
- 24 Kwi 2017
Hahaha. It seems only he has the right to pee in peace.Jessica Yaniv appears in court, confronts Post Millennial reporter
Jessica Yaniv appeared in court today where she accused a Post Millennial reporter of taking photographs of her in the women’s washroom during recess.
Where his idea of being irresistible to anyone with a pulse comes from God only knows...quite surprised he didn't accuse them of rape/molestation.
- Dołączono
- 14 Cze 2019
More has popped up on the online court search, I have no idea what to make of it but there is a new criminal file on record for Yaniv. When you look at charges they are listed as today and description is "CCC - 507.1(1) Hearing to determine process other than in 507(1)" with hearing date Feb 5th.
Can anyone desipher this?
Can anyone desipher this?
- Dołączono
- 31 Lip 2019
Yes, seems odd here, unless one of the two charges was private.
- Dołączono
- 24 Kwi 2017
"Referral when private prosecution
- 507.1 (1) A justice who receives an information laid under section 504, other than an information referred to in subsection 507(1), shall refer it to a provincial court judge or, in Quebec, a judge of the Court of Quebec, or to a designated justice, to consider whether to compel the appearance of the accused on the information."
(double Dutch to me I'm afraid)
- Dołączono
- 2 Paź 2018
From https://www.ppsc-sppc.gc.ca/eng/pub/fpsd-sfpg/fps-sfp/tpd/p5/ch09.html
The Pre-enquete – Section 507.1
Section 507.1 governs pre-inquiry hearings in the case of private prosecutions.Footnote 9 It requires that a justice receiving an information sworn by a private informant refer that information to a provincial court judge or, in Quebec, to a judge of the Court of Quebec or to a designated justice to consider whether to compel the appearance of the accused. The justice or judge conducts a pre-enquete to determine whether process should issue to compel the attendance of the person named in the information to answer to the charge, thus to determine whether a criminal prosecution will be commenced. These provisions were designed to provide a judicial screening process to avoid burdening the justice system with vexatious litigation, misuse of the criminal process in order to advance a civil dispute, and to protect innocent persons from the stigma of having to appear in court on such matters. Footnote 10
This “pre-enquete” or process hearing Footnote 11 places the onus on the private informant to establish that a summons or warrant should issue to compel an accused to attend before the court to answer a criminal charge. The information must establish a prima facie case, requiring some evidence on all of the essential elements of the offence. Footnote 12
The judge or designated justice may issue process compelling the appearance of the accused only after considering the allegations and evidence of the informant and being satisfied that the relevant Attorney General has received a copy of the information, has been given reasonable notice of the hearing and has had an opportunity to cross-examine, call witnesses and present evidence.
A criminal proceeding commences with the swearing of an information. A criminal prosecution commences with the issuance of process to compel the appearance of the accused. Crown counsel may intervene to take over the prosecution or withdraw a charge only after the court makes an order issuing process. Footnote 13 Crown counsel may, however, enter a stay at any time after an information is sworn.
Section 507(2) to (8 ) regarding compelling appearance in public prosecutions applies to the hearing under s. 507.1. Unless expressly prohibited in a particular statute, the Criminal Code provisions permitting private prosecutions apply to other federal statutes. Footnote 14 Thus, s. 507.1 applies to proceedings under the Criminal Code and all other federal acts.
If the pre-enquete justice does not issue process to compel the appearance of the accused, and the private prosecutor has not commenced proceedings to compel process within six months, the Information is deemed never to have been laid. Footnote 15
The Pre-enquete – Section 507.1
Section 507.1 governs pre-inquiry hearings in the case of private prosecutions.Footnote 9 It requires that a justice receiving an information sworn by a private informant refer that information to a provincial court judge or, in Quebec, to a judge of the Court of Quebec or to a designated justice to consider whether to compel the appearance of the accused. The justice or judge conducts a pre-enquete to determine whether process should issue to compel the attendance of the person named in the information to answer to the charge, thus to determine whether a criminal prosecution will be commenced. These provisions were designed to provide a judicial screening process to avoid burdening the justice system with vexatious litigation, misuse of the criminal process in order to advance a civil dispute, and to protect innocent persons from the stigma of having to appear in court on such matters. Footnote 10
This “pre-enquete” or process hearing Footnote 11 places the onus on the private informant to establish that a summons or warrant should issue to compel an accused to attend before the court to answer a criminal charge. The information must establish a prima facie case, requiring some evidence on all of the essential elements of the offence. Footnote 12
The judge or designated justice may issue process compelling the appearance of the accused only after considering the allegations and evidence of the informant and being satisfied that the relevant Attorney General has received a copy of the information, has been given reasonable notice of the hearing and has had an opportunity to cross-examine, call witnesses and present evidence.
A criminal proceeding commences with the swearing of an information. A criminal prosecution commences with the issuance of process to compel the appearance of the accused. Crown counsel may intervene to take over the prosecution or withdraw a charge only after the court makes an order issuing process. Footnote 13 Crown counsel may, however, enter a stay at any time after an information is sworn.
Section 507(2) to (8 ) regarding compelling appearance in public prosecutions applies to the hearing under s. 507.1. Unless expressly prohibited in a particular statute, the Criminal Code provisions permitting private prosecutions apply to other federal statutes. Footnote 14 Thus, s. 507.1 applies to proceedings under the Criminal Code and all other federal acts.
If the pre-enquete justice does not issue process to compel the appearance of the accused, and the private prosecutor has not commenced proceedings to compel process within six months, the Information is deemed never to have been laid. Footnote 15
- Dołączono
- 24 Kwi 2017
Is this normal, does anyone know, to have a court date booked and then for the above date to appear afterwards (ie after everything is set up for the actual trial)? Seems a bit arse over tit to me - surely it would be more cost/time effective etc to have this booked first then if there is legitimacy to the case/claim then book the trial date.
Unless I'm wrong in my understanding here.
- Dołączono
- 25 Lip 2019
Edited Keene video from JY parody account.Jessica Yaniv appears in court, confronts Post Millennial reporter
Jessica Yaniv appeared in court today where she accused a Post Millennial reporter of taking photographs of her in the women’s washroom during recess.
BREAKING: Jessica Yaniv appears in court, confronts Post Millennial r…
archived 13 Jan 2020 23:51:55 UTCarchive.li
edit to add archive and add. material
#MyNameIsNotJonathon might just trend
TrustedNurd on Twitter
“@a_sirup @Cmags1963 @chriscoastguy @Aquaryan1972 @PumpkinPatch200 @Steel48653653 @BeccaBemused @facepalmchris @onionisfinished @mirandamohajrn @stevenm73890092 @divebomber69 @sikhofyou1 @Prissi_coffee @AGillespie66 @trustednerd @miriam_yaniv @sketchartist001 @maruzeh @Amy60860318...
twitter.com
Załączniki
- Dołączono
- 25 Lip 2019
Aaaand, Jon Boy just completely lost it and bashed Keeane on camera.
twitter.com
edit to archive
Keean Bexte on Twitter
“J. Yaniv just punched me in the back of the head. Just spoke to police. Luckily there are two security cameras directly overhead at the courthouse. I need an advil. https://t.co/3hfm2CfYhq”
twitter.com
edit to archive
Załączniki
- Dołączono
- 25 Lip 2019
Maybe he finally gets to spend some quality time with Donald and they can hug it out in the yard.
BallBuster
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 28 Gru 2017
Aaaand, Jon Boy just completely lost it and bashed Keeane on camera.
Keean Bexte on Twitter
“J. Yaniv just punched me in the back of the head. Just spoke to police. Luckily there are two security cameras directly overhead at the courthouse. I need an advil. https://t.co/3hfm2CfYhq”
edit to archive
Best part of this was Jon screaming to get away from him as he chased Keean down. That’s like screaming rape as you punch someone. I pray we get to see these security videos but I won’t hold my breath.
NoSpiceLife
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 2 Lip 2019
So much for all his disabilities, did he forget or is this another angle for his final insanity pleas?
I keep watching his movement trying to figure out where I've seen it before, then it popped into my head, he looks like a cowboy that after being on a horse all day, is participating in the local rodeo drag queen events.
The twitter comments are funny, loved the 'Lot of testosterone still kicking around in there' comment from someone.
I keep watching his movement trying to figure out where I've seen it before, then it popped into my head, he looks like a cowboy that after being on a horse all day, is participating in the local rodeo drag queen events.
The twitter comments are funny, loved the 'Lot of testosterone still kicking around in there' comment from someone.
ComeGetSome
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 16 Sty 2019
It should be even better than you think. Canada does not have stand your ground (we have Castle doctrine, but that doesn't apply here). Yaniv cannot claim self defense in this case... She approached, was the aggressor, and continued to pursue after keean was retreating.
However, I think Keean will be hard pressed to have anyone pursue charges. Disappointing, I know.
AvantGardener
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 16 Lip 2019
Can somebody archive this, in case Yaniv deletes it?
- Status