📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

They would probably insist that those were all closeted trans men, TBH. They've tried it with other famous female historical figures like Joan of Arc, Amelia Earhart and Florence Nightingale (because last-mentioned once, in her writings, referred to herself as a "fellow").

Trans Advocate Magazine pulled this shit a number of years ago on Twatter. They tried to make out a particular Suffragette (I forget her name now) was a trans "woman" because she used to sometimes wear male clothing. What they conveniently 'forgot' was that she had given birth to children and the reason she occasionally wore male clothes at rallies was because she was protesting about how strict and uncomfortable corsetry was to wear particularly for pregnant women.

Trans Advocate Magazine also attempted to erase White gay men from the history of the Stonewall riots. They even went so far as to say that it was a trans "woman" who initiated the riot..when it was actually a drag queen who very much identifies as the gay man that he is.

The trans cult have no social justice history of their own, so they appropriate from women and White gay men.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Not even that, it was a lesbian who started stonewall. The two “transwomen” who people say started stonewall riots weren’t even there. One was passed out on a park bench from heroin, the other was at another gay bar because stonewall was anti-tranny and only showed up after the riot started. Both of them were involved with the early stonewall marches/pride organizing, which is why they get associated. And both of them were men, who always denied being trannies, and never wanted to be called trans.

Troons are a cancer that take over whatever they can.
 
I was always told it was a drag queen who "threw the first brick." Regardless, whether the person was a gay woman or a gay man, they were not a troon as TA magazine claimed.
 
It bothers me how these people are actually going ahead with these huge operations yet have a staggeringly poor understanding of even most basic anatomy. Biology has the last laugh though, since they are all just castrating themselves in the process.
 
I wish people would stop making Stonewall out to be some great point in history. It wasn't an epicenter of cosmic enlightenment; it was a drunk brawl between closeted bar patrons trying to escape, effeminate twink hookers trying to get paid, and corrupt cop trying to pull a shakedown, in the back of a mob bar, used for blackmail, in 1960's New York dystopia. Not really a high point worth fighting over.
 
No one is disputing that.

The troons appropriating Stonewall from the queers and the Suffragettes from the feminists is lulzworthy though.
 
femboycide.png

femboycide2.png

femboycide3.png

femboycide4.png

How much of this is ironic I can't tell anymore
 
More from Kathryn
hehimkat.jpg

"he/him lesbian" "lesbian" "he/him"
subkat.jpg

Posting about their sexual fetish in public. How classy.
selfawarekat.jpg

I detect a hint of self awareness. They know they're fucked up and should be horrified by their state.
 
Trans Advocate Magazine pulled this shit a number of years ago on Twatter. They tried to make out a particular Suffragette (I forget her name now) was a trans "woman" because she used to sometimes wear male clothing. What they conveniently 'forgot' was that she had given birth to children and the reason she occasionally wore male clothes at rallies was because she was protesting about how strict and uncomfortable corsetry was to wear particularly for pregnant women.

Trans Advocate Magazine also attempted to erase White gay men from the history of the Stonewall riots. They even went so far as to say that it was a trans "woman" who initiated the riot..when it was actually a drag queen who very much identifies as the gay man that he is.

The trans cult have no social justice history of their own, so they appropriate from women and White gay men.

This "transing the dead" thing is particularly pernicious because these people are not around to refute these "totally!trans!" labels being attached to them decades or even centuries after their death. But no, everyone who was in any way gender-nonconforming in their life, even if it was for purely utilitarian reasons (like Joan of Arc, who wore men's clothes because she feared rape and men's clothes could not be so easily removed) simply had to be trans.
 
This "transing the dead" thing is particularly pernicious because these people are not around to refute these "totally!trans!" labels being attached to them decades or even centuries after their death. But no, everyone who was in any way gender-nonconforming in their life, even if it was for purely utilitarian reasons (like Joan of Arc, who wore men's clothes because she feared rape and men's clothes could not be so easily removed) simply had to be trans.

Pretty sure she wore men's clothes because women's clothing was impractical for warfare.

Any who, LBGT have always been trying to appropriate the dead. 10 years back they tried to say Lincoln was gay because him and his friend slept in the same bed together in the winter.

Under this logic, how many of us are honorary lesbians?
 
Of course, it was made out to be something it actually was not.
Any who, LBGT have always been trying to appropriate the dead. 10 years back they tried to say Lincoln was gay because him and his friend slept in the same bed together in the winter.
And James Dean.
As well as Marlon Brando.

Notice how they don't try yo make up stories about ugly actors like Ernest Borgnine or Danny Devito.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole