Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

7487745A-5E60-46B0-8ADB-1CDA0086226E.jpeg
 
So I guess after frogs, the American flag was the next logical step as the new symbol of hate.
At this rate, wearing khakis will be a symbol of oppression and privilege.
So this exceptional individual is either an illegal or an anchor baby himself, and a K-pop stan?

Mr. President, we have your next deportation target.
You really have to love how they can shot themselves in the foot like this. Don’t know whether the K-pop or twitter fucked with their thinking.
 
So I guess after frogs, the American flag was the next logical step as the new symbol of hate.
At this rate, wearing khakis will be a symbol of oppression and privilege.

You really have to love how they can shot themselves in the foot like this. Don’t know whether the K-pop or twitter fucked with their thinking.
I mean, the Eternal Anglo wore khakis as he shot up rebellious pajeets, so maybe it is /sneed .
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jGqakN7sCmYI know we like to bring lack of self-awareness from these types, but check this shit out from the comments on that video

Wyświetl załącznik 1081607
Wyświetl załącznik 1081608
Trump willing to use US Soldiers as human shields for own agenda! We all know those human shields were supposed to be for the Kurds.

It amazes me how so many people not only think that this will set up WW3 but Iran will also win WW3 somehow and completely take over the US.
 
Damn, I didn't know the God Emperor played Halo.
Screenshot_2020-01-03-19-30-56_kindlephoto-2029828.png


Kill the enemy team to score!
Killing Spree!
Running Riot!
Rampage!
Beserker!
Overkill!
Untouchable!
Game Over.
 
Funny thing about everyone screaming about how it's going to be WW3, is if you ask them how exactly it will lead to WW3. The logic always goes directly like this.

US attacks Iran
Russia launches nukes at US.
The End.

or
US attacks Iran (notice they never talk about the provocation, just the US jumping out of an alley and mugging Tehran)
Russia and China invade the US and the EU
OR
EU sues for peace and sits out the war
Mexico and Canada invade US for attacking Iran
US loses
The End

OR
US attacks Iran
????
WORLD WAR THREE

Which apparently is the US fighting Russia... somewhere. They never have a firm answer of where this mysterious fighting will take place, although a few will claim that the US and the Russian military will go no holds barred at each other in a WORLD WAR in Iran and Iraq.

I've started asking a few questions just to check something.
"What started World War One and how..." Beyond "Um, Marmaduke Ferd and Anne was shot" and "Hurrr...." I don't get any answer.
"What started World War Two? and when was it a World War?" is usually either "Germany attacked Britian!" or "The US nuked Hiroshima" or "The Germans attacked Pearl Harbor" and they can't fucking tell me when it was World War Two instead of "Slappy Eurofag Fight 2.0"

They don't know about shit, which means they don't understand that to get WW3, beyond a fucking global thermonuclear holocaust, everyone has to sign up and jump on the bandwagon OR get invaded/attacked to join in on the fabulous shit-show.

They don't get the fact that NATO would get pulled in, which means the vile Gobble Gobble People we preferred over the magical dancing Kurdish goat whisperers would be on our side, we'll be reminded which part of the EU still loves Uncle Sammy (HI, NORWAY! You're still our snowbunny baby! Love ya!), which means that if Russia wanted to pull this shit, they're looking straight in the cold dead eyes of the EU, which will have German and Swiss bankers, reknown for the humanitarian urges and human empathy, silently tallying if Russia's corpse is worth more to the EU than a living Russia is to Russia, while the US screams "WHAT'S THE FUCKING FREQUENCY KENNETH!" from their Polish bases and begins fighting a war they've trained for since 1946.

No, it won't go WW3.

It might go "NATO Coalition VS Caliphate Coalition", but not WW3.

As for the draft restarting?

LOL.

No.

We've gone beyond being able to trust unwilling conscripts with military gear. It's too dangerous, to both morale and to military members, to bring back conscription.

They'd have to have Congress raise the force levels first. Then exhaust the National Guard. Then the Reserves. Then the Inactive Reserves. All without being able to make up the numbers via the recruitment office.

Want to get Millenials to scratch at the recruiter's door like it's the Kavanaugh hearing?

Offer student loan forgiveness after 3 years or 1 combat tour.

So, yeah, no draft needed.
 
Let me point out to you that this is how you entered the thread. You're basically barging in saying everyone else is an exceptional individual and you are the only enlightened one because you've read articles that say orange man bad. You're one of over a hundred people to jump in to the thread doing this, and there'll surely be a hundred more after you.

Since entering, you've proven that you don't know enough about the subjects you keep delving in to, you've had to walk back several of your talking points, you've kept admitting that perhaps other posters are right about X and Y because you don't have a better answer yourself, yet you still desperately cling to orange man bad and act as if you're more enlightened for thinking so.

You have a severe case of TDS, and people like you are the reason this thread exists. I hope you grow out of it eventually, but right now you have the mainstream media's dick of lies so far down your throat it's probably sticking out of your butt. When your assertions are challenged and you can't defend them, it's usually time to re-evaluate them. You might have to do that a lot.

OK, fair enough. I am trying to get over TDS, but I really do hate the guy.

Ironically, I wound up arguing against people who I essentially agree with. I don't think we should be wasting our resources on trying to 'nation-build' in this god-forsaken part of the world.

If it were up to me, I would pull troops to a minimum as soon as possible. But it should be done with as much care as possible. Where those decisions fall will require judgement calls with imperfect knowledge.

Even today, I have to admit I agree that Trump's decision to take out Soleimani is quite defensible, even though it's obviously a risky move.

The essential issue for me is that I think Trump is a bad person, on a personal level. But does that mean he can't be a good President?

I'm not sure. I think Clinton was an outright sociopath, and he did OK as President. On the other hand, I think GW Bush is probably a good person, and he was a nightmare of a President. 'True belivers' are trouble.
 
Lol at this point Trump could just screenshot all these Blue Checkmark morons stanning for the dude mostly responsible for killing and maiming tons of American soldiers and use the compilation as a free political ad.
He also could have done the same for Al-Baghdadi
Trump willing to use US Soldiers as human shields for own agenda! We all know those human shields were supposed to be for the Kurds.

It amazes me how so many people not only think that this will set up WW3 but Iran will also win WW3 somehow and completely take over the US.
The US should:
> Alienate and start trouble with Turkey to protecc commie deathsquads dindu nuffin kurds
> Start a ground-war with Russia in Ukraine over election haxxors & closed gay bars in Crimea

The US should not:
> Make a move outside the playbook and perform targeted strikes against openly hostile assets which attacked our people and are running pseudo-genocidal proxy wars in at least 3 countries
 
The essential issue for me is that I think Trump is a bad person, on a personal level.
You seem to want choir boys to be president. But choir boys sing in the choir, they don't fucking run for president.

Washington, Adams and Jefferson all owned slaves. Hell, all presidents until Lincoln either owned slaves or didn't stop slavery.
Jackson was behind the Trail of Tears.
Wilson used to hold screenings of The Birth of a Nation on the White House lawn.
Franklin Roosevelt put American citizens in internment camps based solely on race.
Johnson was famously racist against black people, or as he like to say, niggers.
George W Bush stumbled us into a war we still haven't gotten ourselves out of almost two decades, thousands of American lives and trillions of dollars later.
Obama set race relations back 50 years and rubbed elbows with Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton.
But Trump says mean words on Twitter, ZOMG!

On the list of the worst, most evil presidents, Trump doesn't even make the top quarter. Hell, he's in the top quarter best. Forty four men have been the president of these United States. Please, name eleven that are less racist than Trump. I'll even spot you Carter. Good Ol' church going Jimmy is probably less racist than Trump. Now name ten more.

You and perspective? Not even once.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole