Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.
$50k for reasonable and necessary attorney's fees
$7504 for litigation expenses
$50k if Vic appeals and loses
$25k if Vic anyone petitions for review and no change is made
$15k if the Texas Supreme Court requests briefs and makes no change
$10k if the Texas Supreme Court requests oral arguments and makes no change
MoRon:
$100k for reasonable and necessary attorney's fees (2x Funimations for 2x the defendants)
$15526.96 for litigation expenses (2x again)
$55k if Vic appeals and loses (get fucked J S. Nomoney)
$12.5k if anyone petitions for review and there is no modification (HALF of Funimations, GET FUCKED)
$22.5k if the Texas Supreme Court requests briefs
$15k if the Texas Supreme Court requests oral arguments
Marchi:
$48,137.50 for reasonable and necessary attorney's fees
$1873.96 for litigation expenses
$37.5k if Vic appeals and loses
$22.5k if anyone petitions for review and there is no modification
$12.5k if the Texas Supreme Court requests briefs
$10k if the Texas Supreme Court requests oral arguments
$5k to each for sanctions, effectively $0
5% interest per annum (year?) per state law.
I don't understand the reasoning behind the numbers in the appeals. Looking at the litigation expenses and attorney's fees, he smacked all 3 of them down to under what the lowest was asking for.
I don't understand the reasoning behind the numbers in the appeals. Looking at the litigation expenses and attorney's fees, he smacked all 3 of them down to under what the lowest was asking for.
My read of the big numbers is: "This is what a competent defense actually cost one of you. If the rest of you want to spend extra for an incompetent one, that's on you."
I should point out that the defendants' lawyers can appeal Chupps' ruling for fees and argue that they should have been paid more. I have no idea if they will. I think if Vic appeals, they will probably appeal the fees ruling.
I sincerely hope he appeals, but it’s interesting that instead of heavy sanctions there are additional fees contingent on his filing (and losing) an appeal.
Chupp awarded $5k in sanctions each for all three parties. The total of all the parties with all attorney fees, expenses, sanctions and fees for appeals comes to $525,542.42.
If Vic decides to forgo appeals he would owe $238,042.42 right now.
So, if he loses appeals, it's essentially doubled. Which is still nowhere near the "Vic is gonna owe millions of dollars to the defendants."
Edit: I can see we're already getting salt build up.
I don't understand the reasoning behind the numbers in the appeals. Looking at the litigation expenses and attorney's fees, he smacked all 3 of them down to under what the lowest was asking for.
That's one of the odder parts to me, as well. He didn't apply a consistent formula to the defendants in that case; Funi's max payout for appeal will be 100%, MoRon's is 55%, and Marchi's is around 75-80% of their attorney's fees for the case proper. I wonder how he arrived at those numbers.
That's also IF Vic appeals the fees for (appeals to courts Chupp has no power over, and might not be allowed to ask fees for), and loses those also, after losing the TCPA appeal
I should point out that the defendants' lawyers can appeal Chupps' ruling for fees and argue that they should have been paid more. I have no idea if they will. I think if Vic appeals, they will probably appeal the fees ruling.
Here is approximately how dumb you are: They can then lose THAT appeal, Vic asks for attorneys fees, gets them, then defendants can appeal THAT, then we have to accumulate MORE attorneys fees, which both sides will ask for in return, and then the cycle repeats.
Is it just turtles all the way down with you assclowns?
