GamerGate Events and Discussion

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Saney
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
The salt is reaaaal (on their side and mine):

iXyMztn.png


Because attitudes become more inclusive when you block discussion and dissenting opinion, don’t you know?

It hurts, but it’s nice to know who my broken pedestals are through GamerGate putting their feet to the fire, so I can move on to people who aren’t hypocrites and actually worth supporting.

It becomes simultaneously funny and tragic when you remember that these people are a fucking ridiculous minority.
 
It becomes simultaneously funny and tragic when you remember that these people are a fucking ridiculous minority.

The drama with Rev60, Common Core conspiracy and so on is funny, the stonewalling is not. They have a hateboner for libertarians as sexist and racist or something, I don’t know man. My attitude should be “fixed”? I think you mean it should conform to your worldview, you patronising ass.

Why do you believe they're a minority? Are you referring to the extremists?
 
The drama with Rev60, Common Core conspiracy and so on is funny, the stonewalling is not. They have a hateboner for libertarians as sexist and racist or something, I don’t know man. My attitude should be “fixed”? I think you mean it should conform to your worldview, you patronising ass.

Why do you believe they're a minority? Are you referring to the extremists?

Yeah, I am.

They're loud, but they're also tiny as hell. Tumblr's SJWs are notorious across the Internet, but they make up less than 20% of the userbase of Tumblr, if that (which is why they are costing Tumblr money). The SJWs on say, DailyKos number under 50 users out of about 3000, but through concentration and aggressiveness, they've locked down certain topics on the site. Even on bullshit like Reddit where they have a strangle-hold on places like SRS, they are not the plurality of users. Even in these users, they constantly jockey for position in their own ranks. Do you think people like that represent the majority of any website?

And finally, look at Video Gaming. Who do you think is a larger fucking market - the people who self-identify as Gamers, or the people convinced that the term "Gamer" itself is misogynistic and holding women back? Here's a spoiler alert - it sure as shit isn't the latter, and most companies worth a damn know this. Hell, this was a centerpiece of Liana K's article.

All of this is very reminiscent of something a lot of people have pointed out to Trans*** shitheads on Tumblr countless times - they make up less than 0.05% of the human population. Tumblr's SJWs hate this fact because it reminds them of how dependent anything they do is on regular fucking human beings. The fact is, they're a minority, and they know it. Hell, their entire lack-of-privilege fucking defense structure's based on it. What they are is loud, obnoxious, and aggressive. They know how to leverage these effectively and they show the zealotry of a fanatic in their dealings.

This, by the way, is why they can't operate outside echo chambers. Whether it's Alex Lifschitz going on about how amazing Depression Quest is and how GTAV isn't a game, Arthur Chu's chimp-out on David Pakman's show for daring to allow Gamergate supporters the ability to speak, or when assholes like Leigh Alexander scream about how Gamers don't need to be your audience (spoiler alert: As Brianna Wu is about to learn, yes, they do), they aren't the plurality, and they fucking know it.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Oh, this gon' be good.

I won't say that I necessarily want to see idlediletante get her just desserts for fucking with the internet's hate machine, but if it does happen, the result of kicking the beehive could not happen to a nicer woman.

Our story begins here.

Apparently, today, idlediletante made a lengthy post warning about /baphomet/ and claimed how a recent attack that it launched against safe haven legislation (such as that which is central to the likes of Silk Road and the Pirate Bay), since a safe and secure internet should not overpower the feels of the so-called SJWs. It then once more cites the Laurelai/Dan Olson Pornography incident, and tries to drum up support for legal action against 8chan, whilst essentially sharing details

I'd have shared this shit with /baph/ myself if I wasn't fucking terrified of them, and know full well what they could do to Pless. My distaste for her as a human being is brobdingnagian, and not even I'm that fucking cruel. Whilst - yes - there'd be something fucking gloriously ironic about Pless being hoisted by her own petard via fucking with people that have no fear and nothing to lose, jesus fuck, there's a reason Baph has the reputation it does.

You do not fuck with these people. Pless better pray to the internet gods she goes under their radar, because Baph's already greasing up Randi Harper for another assault and will need nothing more than that link to expose Pless to the fucking world.
 
For the uninitiated, Baphomet is akin to "Old Anonymous", is that correct?
Yup. Baphomet is basically /b/ before it was overtaken by edgelords and retards.
/baph/ was basically going to happen eventually. People thought 4chan's /b/ was lighter and softer and people wanted a pro raid/dox board.

It basically serves that purpose right now, and I don't expect it to be as popular in a few years. The main reason I lurk it is because they have really good information on how to avoid getting doxx'ed.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole