Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

I don't even know why that's supposed to be so impressive.
McCain was never winning 08 unless every leftist in america got snapped out of existence the day before the election.
Meanwhile Obama could have lost 2012 but that would require the GOP to put up an actual opponent and not Mitt Romney.
I guess predicting the down ballot elections is somewhat more praise worthy but even then those typically just follow the presidential results.
McCain fucked himself in 2008 by being a war hawk and insisting on continuing Bush's war when America was sick of it having Palin as his running mate didn't help either.
 
There will be no two sided war.
If an out and out war happen a America will balkanize like South sudan and America would change into a land of village and region states.

Even that won't happen..... there is no legal route for succession from the US by state, county, city or any other legally-recognized incorporated territory chunk, the only way it can happen is through successful force-of-arms, which nobody at current has the means to do, on either side of the debate.

Everyone fretting about a Civil War, or wanting one, utterly fails to reasonably present a scenario where it happens and is successful (i.e.- no Federal force is used, or is used unsuccesfully, to quell it)

Nobody can even demonstrate what groups of people (Specifically, I want an actual named group, not just "Revolutionaries" ) would take up arms and what specific objectives they'd try to seize.

Until you can cite both of those for me, there's no point at even carrying the "Civil War" discussion anywhere.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Meanwhile, Obama aged like shit in the White House but was weak. So what’s your argument?

Wyświetl załącznik 903190

JFK was President of the United States and yet he died young. Clearly, being president is bad not just for your physical and mental health, but also on your life-span. Therefore, being president is a health hazard and should be reserved for only the most qualified as deemed worthy by the pharmaceutical industry and the WHO.
tales01.jpg
 
I know I'm a few pages late, but Taylor Swift should shut her yap about political matters. Why? Because last time she opined on politics and endorsed someone it didn't really go so well.
It "didn't go well" just because the person she endorsed lost? By that standard literally everyone who's ever endorsed a losing candidate should never comment on politics again.
 
david pakman trump no funny.jpg

david pakman disgusting moments trump.jpg
david pakman disgusting moments trump 02.jpg
david pakman disgusting moments trump 03.jpg
Fellow white David Pakman is new to me.He's trying to make a name for himself in the TDS grift by saying all the right anti-Trump stuff, but he's not a good writer, and at all not charming. The market for TDS-peddlers is packed, so his brand of mediocrity is not going to get him anywhere no matter how many anuses he tongues.

david pakman cbs twitch.jpg
Ha-ha.
 
I'm not a fan of photo ops with babies/small kids in general (the baby in that pic is clearly uncomfortable) but it's not like Trump invented that shit.

For me him refusing to do it would be a mark in his favor, but him doing the bullshit that every other politician does doesn't piss me off in this particular case.
 
I'm not a fan of photo ops with babies/small kids in general (the baby in that pic is clearly uncomfortable) but it's not like Trump invented that shit.

For me him refusing to do it would be a mark in his favor, but him doing the bullshit that every other politician does doesn't piss me off in this particular case.
Kid looks bored or distracted to me, not upset? Not impressed, for sure.
 
Kid looks bored or distracted to me, not upset? Not impressed, for sure.
Oh I didn't mean uncomfortable just because it was in the presence of the aura of THE EVIL TRUMPS, just clearly looks to me like he'd rather be in mama's arms than a stranger's

And again the "taking a picture with a baby" thing is so played out why does anyone even bother with it anymore? But again, acting as if this is some thing Trump came up with is dumb.
 
I know you're trying to look tough/inspire, Bernie, but Bro.... talk about "Old Man Yells at Cloud"

There's a reason successful revolutions don't have geriatrics leading the charge...... 99% of them can't, the remaining 1% just look silly when they try it.
 
Everyone on the DNC has called for a coup since he won, but being the slackivists they are, nothing's happened. Antifa was their best bet, and look what's become of them.
Another part of the reason that’s failed is because of the military. If you can’t get the military as a whole to help unseat someone, it won’t work. In other words, for a successful coup to happen, it has to get really bloody. The DNC would have to make themselves as powerful and ruthless as the Bolsheviks were during the Russian Revolution. Luckily, the DNC has neither the organization or support to make this happen ( as we know so far).
 
Even that won't happen..... there is no legal route for succession from the US by state, county, city or any other legally-recognized incorporated territory chunk, the only way it can happen is through successful force-of-arms, which nobody at current has the means to do, on either side of the debate.

Everyone fretting about a Civil War, or wanting one, utterly fails to reasonably present a scenario where it happens and is successful (i.e.- no Federal force is used, or is used unsuccesfully, to quell it)

Nobody can even demonstrate what groups of people (Specifically, I want an actual named group, not just "Revolutionaries" ) would take up arms and what specific objectives they'd try to seize.

Until you can cite both of those for me, there's no point at even carrying the "Civil War" discussion anywhere.
I was replying to what someone else said. The person who put up mcafee video. I am talking about de facto balkinzation and as a result of decay. Not armed struggle. Not as result of a group pushing for it.

If trump wins and say democrats do go al la brownshirts, and various government factions (which are rumored to support the left) go tet offensive, then the various mechanisms keeping society as a whole will fall apart. America would decentralize into sovereign regions. It won't be a unified continental effort. Think Somalia or Mexico with technically a central government but not very capable of much.

However antifa the best they got and it's not very effective.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole