💊 Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    342
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Hey, Marijan, how long have you been unemployed now? I took a look at the unemployment code of Croatia, and it seems to be limited to up to 450 days of unemployment before you're cut off from receiving any welfare, so I'm guessing you're sponging off your parents?
 
I was just skimming because why would I read this. Does @Holden actually believe that basic hygiene is a form of seduction? Did I read that right?

Exact opposite: Marian thinks filth and BO are seduction, that's why truckers get pussies. If feminism has its way, very soon humanity will go feral and no one will ever bathe.
 
Hey, Marijan, how long have you been unemployed now? I took a look at the unemployment code of Croatia, and it seems to be limited to up to 450 days of unemployment before you're cut off from receiving any welfare, so I'm guessing you're sponging off your parents?
I want to know how he left his last job... fired or quit...

Must have quit... if he refuses to work because it pays sluts, then he must have quit or he was willingly and knowingly paying to stay incel, and given just how fanatic he is about not financing sluts...

So, @Holden... did you quit or get fired?
 
@Holden

If you were offered a chance, would you begin anew?

If you could go back in time, knowing what you know now, to when you were 12 years old. Would you try to make yourself a better, more successful person? Or would you go back to your previous youthful innocence hell-bent on teaching the world that modern western women are all whore monster dedicated to slaughtering virgins like sacrificial goats?

Is there any scenario, even assuming time travel, in which you can have a happy productive life without breaking a woman's legs?
 
@Holden Do you realize in your 'sane society' where women have to marry men sight unseen based on how well connected and how well a man can provide that the best providers would end up with the best women? Is it fair that Mitt Romney and Bill Gates' sons would have top choice simply by virtue of who their daddies are?
Not true at all. If regular providers are valued as much as these men these men don't get better women.

@Holden

If you were offered a chance, would you begin anew?

If you could go back in time, knowing what you know now, to when you were 12 years old. Would you try to make yourself a better, more successful person? Or would you go back to your previous youthful innocence hell-bent on teaching the world that modern western women are all whore monster dedicated to slaughtering virgins like sacrificial goats?

Is there any scenario, even assuming time travel, in which you can have a happy productive life without breaking a woman's legs?
If I could go back to the age 12 I'd know what to do. The only problem would be that I'd have to check how were the teenage girls then. Like I said, I don't know that enough, being too shy to meet one. Maybe I could have gotten a wife if I met some of them. But since they'd probably be scum already I'd start to terrorize them and maim them already at 12.
 
Not true at all. If regular providers are valued as much as these men these men don't get better women.


If I could go back to the age 12 I'd know what to do. The only problem would be that I'd have to check how were the teenage girls then. Like I said, I don't know that enough, being too shy to meet one. Maybe I could have gotten a wife if I met some of them. But since they'd probably be scum already I'd start to terrorize them and maim them already at 12.
Are you going to tell us how your parents abused you now? Because not buying you a prostitute isn't abuse.
 
If I could go back to the age 12 I'd know what to do.
Suicide?
i have. providers are valued, even those not immensely rich, because the femifascist government doesn't hand women money.
Women like providers because it shows the character of the man. It shows that he has the will and drive to take care of his family.

You won't have to worry about any of that though, you'll never be a real man.
 
i have. providers are valued, even those not immensely rich, because the femifascist government doesn't hand women money. what is there to explain. it's how societies pre welfare functioned.

In a pre-welfare society, we'd have kicked you out of the village by now.
 
But you think that their father should decide who they marry, and that they should willingly accept that man as their 'provider'.
it doesn't matter if their father decides or they decide.
Your question is based on a stupid assumption that women marrying for resources meant that this didn't make men with resources attractive but only seduction did. It is, basically, an idiotic attempt to make post 1960 standards apply to all of history. It is based on fundamental ignorance. Women were always attracted to the type of men most other women wanted and these were not seducers in sane societies.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole