- Dołączono
- 20 Wrz 2016
Russell, buddy, you dingus--the reason nobody lets you change and move on from stupid, offensive shit you said in the past is because you keep saying stupid, offensive shit in the present, making it clear you weren't just being edgy and trying to play "shock jock," and that you have not changed or moved on one bit since then.Oh, how foolish we are. All this stalking, hit lists, wishing for Taylor's mom to die, celebrating kids dying(to make room for him in the news), homophobia, claiming fucking hoors was his sexual orientation, racism, misogny, having no friends, spending TWO FUCKING MONTHS rehearsing for his horrible AGT act where he can't even keep rhythm when dancing, thirsting over IG models etc. etc.(the list goes on) was just because he tried being a shock jock. We should just let it go. We were fooled.
Wyświetl załącznik 689826
And of course, the boilerplate insinuation we have no lives, which is what every cow says in a feeble attempt to shame us into not laughing at them, because they can offer no better reason. Russell, we laugh at you because you're a dolt, and because IRL human foolishness is infinitely funnier than any stupid sitcom or puerile comedy film. Your persistent and aggressive stupidity, your unwitting incompetence, and your steadfast delusion that you're actually a misunderstood genius? That's some funny fucking shit, man.
ETA:
Frankly, I don't think either of them knows the first damned thing about why the other is being mocked here, and don't care to investigate each other. That we're laughing at both of them is enough reason for solidarity.I'm also stunned he has the brass to team up with a woman who, if she had any objectivity, would denounce him because he's the literal embodiment of her every grudge against men.
Or maybe they each know just enough about the other to realize they would hate each other with unreasoning fury if they were any better acquainted, so they willfully avoid engaging with any more facts than they absolutely have to.
Either way, it's obvious they're both operating from the idea that "The enemy of my enemy is my friend," while failing to understand that it has very limited applicability.
Ostatnio edytowane: