Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Vivec]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-FAGXL_CQPI
Our favorite Conserva-soy-boy did a Trolling video on the LA Women's march. Some of the TDS in this video is actually pretty bad....like, really, really, bad. They're really good examples of it, but these are really, really sick people. This has it all. "Inclusiveness", weed smokers, Harry Potter lovers, lack of explanations on Orange Man Bad, "white privilege", wage gap believers, all that fucking shit. It's a cavalcade of TDS madness. I hope you Kiwis enjoy it.

In order to enjoy this you'd have to be willing to listen to this scrawny walking cuck stereotype speak for more than 15 seconds, and I couldn't do it.

 

[Malodorous Merkin]

O...kay then. I'm guessing this is because of Pelosi and Schumer's cringey podium sharing last time, but still, if you have to trot someone out for the big "OH YEAH?" to Trump, why is it yet another "rising star of the Democratic Party" who lost?

She's an unemployed failed politician. She's in debt to the tune of a quarter of a million dollars, and a portion of that debt is unpaid taxes.

She's the perfect person to take a multi-millionaire business mogul and leader of the country to task for his failings.

 

[Vorhtbame]

She's unemployed, in debt to the tune of a quarter of a million dollars, and a portion of that debt is unpaid taxes.

So, basically your average Democrat politician.

 

[Cosmug]

So, basically your average Democrat politician.

So she’s a loser who thinks the public will pick her over a billionaire because he a waycis wyte mayo. I love this line of thinking where the less qualified you are for a role the more responsibility you should get out of pity.

 

[Mr. A. L. Mao]

was viewtiful joe one of the chosen ones fired too?

Joe "Blockhead" Bernstein escaped this round, but there's always next time...

 

[Bush did USS Maine]

Say what? Seriously? Where'd this come from?

I am intrigued and wish to subscribe to a newsletter.

Oh boy, a chance to talk about my favorite Something Awful poster! Prester Jane (formerly Prester John) was a poster on the Debate & Discussion subforum of SA. He is a self-described schizophrenic who came up with an idea he calls the "narrativist framework" about how people form their political beliefs. It's essentially the idea of "dog-whistle politics" as viewed through the eyes of a schizophrenic. The theory goes that people, who just so happen to have right wing political ideas, view the world through some grand story where they're horribly persecuted by an enemy that they will one day overcome. This may be Satan, the government, another race, economic collapse, what have you. They truly believe this overall story, what Prester calls an inner narrative, but they can't say these things out loud. So instead you get an outer narrative, something like "we need to cut taxes" or "marriage is between a man and a woman" so they can covertly discuss their beliefs with other narrativists.

As these narrativists group together, inevitably conflicts arrive in the group, which leads to what is referred to as a compaction cycle. This stage is where less committed members of the group are pushed out due to infighting, while the true believers within the group recommit themselves to believing in a new, more extreme version of this inner narrative. As these compaction cycles play out over and over in some group, the theory is that the groups will radicalize and grow violent, or at least elect Donald Trump.

All this theory initially came together in a thread that ended around 150 pages in in the D&D forum, then Prester was banned for some drama with the D&D mod. The thread was then closed and a new one was opened in a subforum of D&D, the mod followed him there and banned him again. I'm not sure what exactly the drama was there, I think Prester went around to a number of different politics threads not shutting up about this theory and people started hating him.

As mentioned, Prester has two Something Awful threads, as well as a blog. The threads were funny to me, as a weird group of true believers formed around this theory, helped him expand on it, and encouraged him to shop it around to academics, rather than suggest the self-admitted schizophrenic get further treatment. I've actually been meaning for a while to dig through and get some material for the Something Awful thread here, but it's a whole lot of pages of kinda dense material if you weren't actively following it and I haven't had to time to read through again and pick some of the funnier stuff. That said, I've spent a lot of effort writing this up, so here's my favorite exchange from the original thread, right after Trump's inauguration, a perfect example of a compaction cycle in the wild!

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Oh boy, a chance to talk about my favorite Something Awful poster! Prester Jane (formerly Prester John) was a poster on the Debate & Discussion subforum of SA. He is a self-described schizophrenic who came up with an idea he calls the "narrativist framework" about how people form their political beliefs. It's essentially the idea of "dog-whistle politics" as viewed through the eyes of a schizophrenic. The theory goes that people, who just so happen to have right wing political ideas, view the world through some grand story where they're horribly persecuted by an enemy that they will one day overcome. This may be Satan, the government, another race, economic collapse, what have you. They truly believe this overall story, what Prester calls an inner narrative, but they can't say these things out loud. So instead you get an outer narrative, something like "we need to cut taxes" or "marriage is between a man and a woman" so they can covertly discuss their beliefs with other narrativists.

As these narrativists group together, inevitably conflicts arrive in the group, which leads to what is referred to as a compaction cycle. This stage is where less committed members of the group are pushed out due to infighting, while the true believers within the group recommit themselves to believing in a new, more extreme version of this inner narrative. As these compaction cycles play out over and over in some group, the theory is that the groups will radicalize and grow violent, or at least elect Donald Trump.

All this theory initially came together in a thread that ended around 150 pages in in the D&D forum, then Prester was banned for some drama with the D&D mod. The thread was then closed and a new one was opened in a subforum of D&D, the mod followed him there and banned him again. I'm not sure what exactly the drama was there, I think Prester went around to a number of different politics threads not shutting up about this theory and people started hating him.

As mentioned, Prester has two Something Awful threads, as well as a blog. The threads were funny to me, as a weird group of true believers formed around this theory, helped him expand on it, and encouraged him to shop it around to academics, rather than suggest the self-admitted schizophrenic get further treatment. I've actually been meaning for a while to dig through and get some material for the Something Awful thread here, but it's a whole lot of pages of kinda dense material if you weren't actively following it and I haven't had to time to read through again and pick some of the funnier stuff. That said, I've spent a lot of effort writing this up, so here's my favorite exchange from the original thread, right after Trump's inauguration, a perfect example of a compaction cycle in the wild!
Wyświetl załącznik 652903 Wyświetl załącznik 652904 Wyświetl załącznik 652905 Wyświetl załącznik 652906 Wyświetl załącznik 652907 Wyświetl załącznik 652908 Wyświetl załącznik 652909 Wyświetl załącznik 652910

His theory sounds so bland and vague. It can be applied to nearly anything.

Communists dog whistle with "eat the rich" and "bash the fash" so they can covertly discuss their believs with other communists.

What a retard.

 

[Cosmug]

His theory sounds so bland and vague. It can be applied to nearly anything.

Communists dog whistle with "eat the rich" and "bash the fash" so they can covertly discuss their believs with other communists.

What an exceptional individual.

The entire idea of a dog whistle is nonsensical ghost phrenology. Step one of applying this theory is assuming you’re able to read minds. It’s literally just theory crafting to look past actually addressing arguments being made to try to diagnose the hidden malicious secret motive.

 

[Bush did USS Maine]

To an extent it is, certainly, I think he mentions a few times in the thread it can be apolitical, but very rarely goes in depth as far as left wing authoritarianism and instead focuses on right wingers. The first thread's title in fact was changed from something like "Decoding Narrativism" to "Decoding Trumpism" at some point. There's slightly more detail to the structure of the narrative and such, but it's a very generic idea that a group on SA took as incredibly deep thinking.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

Wyświetl załącznik 651880

Imagine seriously believing that being a Trump supporter is morally equivalent to bring a pedophile.

 

[Capsaicin Addict]

Imagine seriously believing that being a Trump supporter is morally equivalent to bring a pedophile.

Hence why Teddy Beale, for all his numerous flaws, is not wrong about 'SJWs always project'.

I'll be honest, I misread the D&D thing as ... well, the guy getting fired from Paizo or WotC, not getting kicked out of a politics forum. Still lulzworthy.

But this all reinforces the idea I've been mulling that liberals are incapable of analyzing nonleftist ideas or empathizing with them. The obsessions with 'dog whistles' as well. They cannot mentally wrap their brain around certain concepts like 'just because you sprinkle the magic fairy dust of government on it, doesn't make it better'.

 

[Vorhtbame]

But this all reinforces the idea I've been mulling that liberals are incapable of analyzing nonleftist ideas or empathizing with them.

A person whose entire internal process is a series of emotional reactions, and has never learned to moderate them or exclude them from the body of facts for consideration, will necessarily assume that this is how everyone else also "thinks". Entirely too many people, and I will agree that it crosses the aisle, lack any sort of emotional discipline or intellectual rigor.

Side note, semi-related: I think it was 20, 25 years ago that Rush Limbaugh, of all people, pointed out that if a person says "I feel" to preface a statement of their opinions, they are more likely to skew left.

 

[Kari Kamiya]

Side note, semi-related: I think it was 20, 25 years ago that Rush Limbaugh, of all people, pointed out that if a person says "I feel" to preface a statement of their opinions, they are more likely to skew left.

I find that interesting since when I use "I feel" in a conversation, I'm tapping more into that "gut instinct" even if I don't ever say it that way. So I wonder what exactly it is folks who lean left "feel" with in that regard.

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

O...kay then. I'm guessing this is because of Pelosi and Schumer's cringey podium sharing last time, but still, if you have to trot someone out for the big "OH YEAH?" to Trump, why is it yet another "rising star of the Democratic Party" who lost?

Oh, hilarious tangent: Scott D. Rhodes aka Scott Platek is white supremacist who runs a bitchute channel. He also pays for racist messages to be delivered via flier and robocalls aimed at creating situations for Democrat politicians to accrue victim points and stand righteously against evil alt-right anti-semite nazis.

His latest shilling seems to be for Andrew Gillum and Stacey Abrams, both hailed as 'likely 2020 kingmakers'.

From an article on one of his fliers:

Of the caches of racist fliers that have littered Sandpoint neighborhoods since April, the city’s mayor, Shelby Rognstad, has been the primary target.

A Photoshopped depiction of Rognstad in a gas chamber – a Nazi-clad cartoon frog, Pepe, manning the switch – was the most recent on-paper assault by what he believes is a tiny faction of white supremacists.

Other fliers had broader hate-filled messages, including “Keep Idaho safe…Keep Idaho clean …Keep Idaho white,” words draped over racist caricatures of three men, Hispanic, African-American and Jewish.

Crazy how these people cannot stand on their own feet and must manufacture outrage in order to drum up support. Also crazy to think how many other mustache-twirling villains may have been created to only provide a bad guy to vanquish. Scott Rhodes/Platek praises Patrick Little in one of his videos and created racist robocallers for him. Coincidentally both these guys straw man for Dianne Feinstein.

“It’s sadly clever and powerful,” Quilici said.

The robocalls included one last month to California synagogues and media outlets, labeling that state’s Senator Dianne Feinstein a “traitorous Jew” and endorsing her opponent who admires Adolf Hitler and denies that millions of Jews were killed in the Holocaust.

Other robocalls from the same source last year targeted the mayor and city council members in Alexandria, Virginia, police said.

The calls to the Virginia elected officials came after white nationalist and racist “alt-right” leader Richard Spencer was confronted by a Georgetown University professor and later kicked out a fitness center in that community. The professor’s photo subsequently was printed on the hate flyers distributed in the Virginia community.

The new, high-tech, computer-delivered brand of hate is believed to be the handiwork of one man — identified by police and in media accounts as Scott D. Rhodes, who moved to Sandpoint, Idaho, from California.

“We’re coming to you from the racist capital of the United States … very white, very racist North Idaho,” Rhodes says in opening remarks of his podcasts.

source

 

[Capsaicin Addict]

His latest shilling seems to be for Andrew Gillum and Stacey Abrams, both hailed as 'likely 2020 kingmakers'.

Lolwut.

Tank Abrams is a sore loser who is already being mocked because the Dems picked her to respond to Trump's SOTU address. Even money on if she says something tangible or if it's all chimpanzee screeching.

And Gillum is in hot water over ethics charges and just took a CNN position. Some kingmaker.

 

[yeahweknow]

Scott Rhodes/Platek praises Patrick Little in one of his videos and created racist robocallers for him.

so that's where this masterpiece came from

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

So this dude was a someone who you pay to false flag you? Is that the idea?

 

[damian]

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

Wyświetl załącznik 653078
Wyświetl załącznik 653074
Wyświetl załącznik 653075

OK, who'd trump run down? Was it Rosie O'Donnell? Because I don't buy it was an accident if it was...

"An unknown man"

Yep, checks out.

 

[moocow]

So Andrew Gillum, the SJW who got embarrassed in Florida, is now joining CNN as a political commentator.

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainme...ical-commentator-amid-renewed-ethics-problems

I love that the URL categorizes this article as "entertainment" and not "news" or "politics." CNN's that much of a joke to Fox News that they don't even consider them a news agency anymore.