🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon, alleged rapist and revenge pornographer. Exiled in Mexico carlesss on a diet of slop. Has triple titties. Wanted to fuck Keffals' moobs.

Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wyróżnienie
I don't quite understand why people are hung up on exactly why youtube did this. They can do it for any reason. The TOS is like following the Talmud...no matter what you do, you are violating something.

In my mind, it ultimately comes down to this perspective..."do you make me enough money to put up with your bullshit"...same perspective any employer has with employee.

Ralph and company...to google/youtube...their bullshit is not worth the money they pull into them. Anything else is semantics. It is all about cash.

Same with WSJ. They don't shit about the kids, Ralph's popularity, peopling spamming shit to their twitter, email and shit. Does this article make them money? Yes. It will feed their audience. It will generate clicks. Morons will post cringe comments online, giving them more material to run with. It is no brainer to me.

They will be able to milk this cow for days.
 
JustStopDude powiedział(a):
In my mind, it ultimately comes down to this perspective..."do you make me enough money to put up with your bullshit"...same perspective any employer has with employee.

Ralph and company...to google/youtube...their bullshit is not worth the money they pull into them. Anything else is semantics. It is all about cash.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Literally the #1 late-night talkshow. This argument doesn't hold water.
 
JustStopDude powiedział(a):
I don't quite understand why people are hung up on exactly why youtube did this. They can do it for any reason. The TOS is like following the Talmud...no matter what you do, you are violating something.

In my mind, it ultimately comes down to this perspective..."do you make me enough money to put up with your bullshit"...same perspective any employer has with employee.

Ralph and company...to google/youtube...their bullshit is not worth the money they pull into them. Anything else is semantics. It is all about cash.

Same with WSJ. They don't shit about the kids, Ralph's popularity, peopling spamming shit to their twitter, email and shit. Does this article make them money? Yes. It will feed their audience. It will generate clicks. Morons will post cringe comments online, giving them more material to run with. It is no brainer to me.

They will be able to tard cum this cow for days.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

those are all good points. as long as you dont look at the numbers. youtube needs every $ they can get, google will not keep an expensive failing website for ever(youtube burns alot of money)

Print media isnt there to make money, its the easyest way to buy influence.
 
Secret Asshole powiedział(a):
Yeah, none of the 'right wing' channels even came close to Ralph in terms of popularity and quality, even if Ralph was late and gay every night.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Let's all be honest, if YouTube treated right wing speech like they do left wing speech, they'd probably be more popular than left leaning channels. Of course though, channels like Ralph and Metokurs will always be more popular because they're closer to true neutral .
 
Don't you just love it when salty Jews take out their anger on you by killing kids dying of cancer?
 
Fougaro powiedział(a):
Did Gator just say that the money they raised on the Healstream was around 8% of Saint Jude's annual budget? If true then that's pretty impressive on the Killstream's part, which makes the Wall Street Journal look even shittier.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Not a chance in hell that’s true. St. Jude’s is an enormous, well-respected charity with a massive research hospital. It’s in the millions at least.
 
Lysol powiedział(a):
It's good to know that you are self-admittedly too stupid to understand why exactly his audience's comments wouldn't have mattered either way.

Double points for admitting that you don't have any meaningful input and should be ignored.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Yeah, there's probably a fundamental difference in our viewpoints if you think that the only reason to be on KiwiFarms is to promote why or not why The Ralph Retort is politically valid.
 
I can't believe you would take away money from sick kids just because you are mad at he guy who gave them the money.
If Yoree is a daughter of such a rich doctor, why doesn't she pay back the money and make herself look good?
 
Yellow Yam Scam powiedział(a):
Yeah, there's probably a fundamental difference in our viewpoints if you think that the only valid reason to be on KiwiFarms is to promote why or not why The Ralph Retort is politically valid.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Yeah, because that's what I said, learn how to into reading comprehension.

Also, the idea of something being "politically valid" determining whether or not it should be discussed - just lmao
 
ddlloo powiedział(a):
What a shitful fucking article. An obscene amount of details and context were omitted, and the dumb cunt clearly has never watched a single episode if she doesn't understand how Ralph takes down and then reuploads each episode to the archive channel.

Oh, and $5 to anyone who can guess who the unnamed '''researcher''' mentioned in the article. If it isn't that hamplanet censorship fetishist who ragged out at Jim over his meming at dipstick reporters eager to question bloodsoaked survivors of a mass shooting then I'll be surprised.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

I'm putting my shekels on Kraut, he had a journalist contact no?

So far it seems the skeptics will win the shitposting war.
 
The Wall Street Journal took the money that my child with cancer needed to survive, but it's morally righteous because it's fighting racism. #VictoryRoyale
 
Wyróżnienie
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole