Disaster Troon loses NASA internship over telling Homer Hickam to "suck her dick and balls"

https://archive.fo/wivu9

Step aside, Quinn Norton. Someone else just claimed the title for quickest firing of 2018. But this one was arguably much less deserved.

Social media was abuzz this afternoon after a woman named Naomi H won and lost an internship at NASA in less than a day thanks to this tweet.

DlI6EwuXsAA6ueM.jpg large.jpg


It’s not clear what Naomi H’s full last name is (she has since locked her Twitter account). The poster likely assumed she was a furry because of the anime in her Twitter avatar (which has since been replaced with a photo of a real life deer).

But regardless, Naomi didn’t tell just any member of the National Space Council to “suck [her] dick and balls.” Homer Hickam is a NASA engineering legend.

He started out building rockets in his backyard before serving in the U.S. Army during the Vietnam War. Hickam then worked as an aerospace engineer for NASA, designing spacecraft and training crews.

But Hickam is arguably most famous for his literary pursuits. His memoir Rocket Boys, detailing his early life as a space enthusiast, was adapted into the 1999 film October Sky starring Jake Gyllenhaal.

Twitter users thus chided Naomi for her lack of space knowledge. But they also accused Hickam of pulling rank and robbing a young woman of a great opportunity because of one stupid tweet.

It wouldn’t be the first time that happened. Communications executive Justine Sacco was fired from media company IAC in 2014 for tweeting “Going to Africa. Hope I don’t get AIDS. Just kidding. I’m white!” (She has since been rehired.)

But in fact, Hickam didn’t make Naomi suffer. Instead, he took responsibility, noting on his blog that while he’s not bothered by the word “fuck” he thought his superiors at NASA might be.

Once he found out that Naomi lost her internship offer, the two connected and apologized to each other.

“After talking to her, I am certain she deserves a position in the aerospace industry and I’m doing all I can to secure her one that will be better than she lost,” Hickam wrote. “I have also talked to the folks that had to do with her internship and made absolutely certain that there will be no black mark on her record.”

So thanks to Hickam, it looks like Naomi’s sky (in October and beyond) will be bright. But hopefully she’ll watch what she says on social media from now on.
 
The questions remaining are:

Will this furry get away for what he said on social network ?

And, will the old man really move inside influences to NASA re-hire that furry ?

To answer your first question, yes. Absolutely.

As for the second, I really hope after being dogpiled and belittled by petty scum that he renegs on his desire to help the (former) intern out. He owes her nothing and I think after having to delete his blog post maybe he realizes that. You can't win with these people.
 
To answer your first question, yes. Absolutely.

As for the second, I really hope after being dogpiled and belittled by petty scum that he renegs on his desire to help the (former) intern out. He owes her nothing and I think after having to delete his blog post maybe he realizes that. You can't win with these people.

You and i brother ... once you fucked up like that accept the mistake and charge with the consequences plain and simple.

But you're right these people either plays the victim card in silence and when is a good time to break silence. Release it and expect an army of SJW's make a change.org petition to NASA to re-hire the furry :P

We nasa have better things to deal rather than a twisted mindF*ck furry creature of the fog :story:
 
The thing that people don't understand is that NASA is kind of like Google in how it operates.

NASA can be generalized to two parts: space missions and research/development. Even then, any research is slight and focused on optimization rather than anything truly groundbreaking, which is contracted out by the government to private companies because said companies will actually get it done. Aside from that space mission design and analysis is... boring in my opinion. I've done it better and I don't want to do it again. It's mostly pencil-pushing with little to no creative spin on it. You follow the rules and that's it.

This is like Google. Google has two parts: maintaining the infrastructure and research/development. Maintaining the infrastructure is boring and monotonous work that requires truly loyal shells who will only leave the company when they get let go for serving their purpose like cannon fodder.

This is how NASA operates. They require mindless entry-level idiots who think doing anything at NASA is cool when it is actually fucking boring.

Edit: The internship is most likely software related and not anything actually interesting
Yeah, it's pretty sad to see how far NASA has fallen in recent years. Most of the interesting stuff, like landing on a comet, is coming out of the EU space agency. The US has the capacity to perform some real innovations in space but, to the best of my knowledge, it's not being prioritized at all. Truth be told, many of these problems can be blamed on the ways that science has been warped and distorted in the US. The national science foundation recognizes communication and history as sciences now and the social sciences get their own dedicated budget; they used to compete with biologists for funding. Additionally, the EPA and many of the other federal agencies are engaging in bad research funding practices, see investing in bad science. To top it all off, the NSF and NASA now officially use a policy of affirmative action when distributing graduate school fellowships. Honestly, the only parts of the US government research infrastructure that I think are still working well are the research universities, select national laboratories, and military laboratories. Imo, we can blame a bunch of dumb politicians and bad administrative hires on what's become of NASA.

On a more personal note, I can verify what you mean about NASA picking up incompetent hires. I've known a couple kids who got some internships at NASA and none of them have impressed me. One of them tried to engage in plagiarism and got called out by a professor. The other two were probably nepotism hires given that they had family actively working there.
 
On a more personal note, I can verify what you mean about NASA picking up incompetent hires. I've known a couple kids who got some internships at NASA and none of them have impressed me. One of them tried to engage in plagiarism and got called out by a professor. The other two were probably nepotism hires given that they had family actively working there.

Speaking of incompetent hires, back in highschool we had a younger physics teacher for a year who once had a job at NASA, he gave it up for the aforementioned highschool teaching job, quit that to join a rock band, and the last I heard he went back to college for some other degree.
 
The funny thing to me is that the troon takes approximately an hour to respond to Hickham's tweet. I thought "Okay, this guy...Whatever just fired a quick Tweet back without thinking." But no, they had a full hour to construct a mature tweet back or better yet, maybe look up the person your'e responding too since they don't have a cringey Deviant Art avatar? Just maybe do a quick Google search? Nah?
 
Wyświetl załącznik 525434
If this is the kind of logic he uses he did everyone a favor by getting himself fired.

It's almost like this moron doesn't want that internship back- you were getting something handed on a silver platter and continues to act like an exceptional exceptional moron. Now I hope Hickham really does renege on his deal because clearly, this fool doesn't deserve the opportunity.

:powerlevel: And it's key to note that within the large circle of furries I know - most of them agreed what happened was totally justified. I wish they were the majority and not the loud minority that keeps screeching.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Also, does anybody have archives of the tweets on his alt account, MapleDeer?
 
am i alone in finding the cringiest part of this to be that the guy responded to a tweet with naughty words with "Language"?

getting fired for tweets in general is garbage.

He was being a bro by warning her of NASA's retarded policy.

He does come off as a retarded moralizing old man with that post though. Probably should have been more specific.

I don't get why people are hating. Troons are disliked for being degenerate but getting overexcited over getting a job is probably one of the least degenerate things possible.

It sucks that they lost out.
 
I don't get why people are hating. Troons are disliked for being degenerate but getting overexcited over getting a job is probably one of the least degenerate things possible.

There's a massive difference between walking into a room full of your friends and telling them to sit down and shut the fuck up because you just landed some prestige job with company A and walking into a food court and doing the same thing. If you do the latter, someone's probably going to call you out and there's a good chance someone's going to bring your behaviour to the attention of company A.

Public tweets come with no expectation of privacy. You will be judged by perfect strangers on what you tweet, and if your tweets mention your employer they will probably be drawn to their attention.

A huge amount of our content comes from people posting shit publicly which is best said privately. The pile on by her followers led to her losing an opportunity, but I doubt a single one of them will reflect on their behaviour.
 
To top it all off, the NSF and NASA now officially use a policy of affirmative action when distributing graduate school fellowships.
So, funny thing about affirmative action...

Because of many constitutional precedents (and a bunch of court cases and various laws), discrimination is illegal in basically every sector where it's regulated that way. And the courts do respond to these lawsuits, even for "privileged" parts of society.

However, education is an exception. Education is the only part of US society where affirmative action is legal. Quotas are still illegal, but schools can legally nudge things in more subtle ways.

But the funny thing about this, is that while the Supreme Court ruled AA legal in Grutter v Bollinger, they also said that this cannot be legal forever. There were some hearty dissents in that case, particularly by Justice Thomas, but ultimately they ruled in favor of AA for schools.

But the best part is that they specified an actual expiry date. They said 25 years. (The language is flaky, but I do think they'll be held to it, and at the very least, it'll get several lawsuits in the door.) That's due in 2028. It's a ways off, but when it happens, especially if we have Justice Kavanaugh, it's going to be a hilarious salt geyser. I think they'll finally stake that vampire.
 
The usual suspects will demand that forever. Doesn't mean they'll have a leg to stand on.

The thing is it they don't have a leg to stand on now. They can't prove "institutional racism" exists... which is why they keep talking about it like it's a fact. They can claim it's running rampant and ruining lives and that only AA stands in its way, and nobody can prove them wrong because its very existence is a matter of "social justice" faith. And, of course, they'll scream at you and slur you if you so much as ask them to prove there's a problem.

How is that going to change in 10 years? Are politicians going to have more spine in a decade? Will they start caring more about the truth than about what keeps voters from coming after them with pitchforks? I'm skeptical.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole