Mystery Woman's Story - You dare question the King's indefatigable loyalty to his GF???

Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
I just posted "Mods, you do know banning everyone who questions this makes it seem more believable, right?"
Banned before I could screen cap it
 
I got banned for repeating something phil said :(

edit: Phil received a 'troll' tip and said "stupid kids keep giving me money" and I just wrote that back in chat hahahaha
 
Screenshot (130).png


>We made dutch brownies
>WE MADE D U T C H B R O W N I E S

We were so wrong.....
 
I love how all of Phil's claims about Kim's account (it's a catfish, not an escort, only appeared recently) have already been verified against and blown the fuck out

But that's what's troubling me, if what Kim says is true and what he says is also true (The part of him blocking her and calling her a catfish) then isn't the man digging his own grave? He obviously doesn't intend to pay if he is having that shitty attitude or maybe he is trying to save face while possibly DMing MW telling her "I just said that so one would find out"...
 
But that's what's troubling me, if what Kim says is true and what he says is also true (The part of him blocking her and calling her a catfish) then isn't the man digging his own grave? He obviously doesn't intend to pay if he is having that shitty attitude or maybe he is trying to save face while possibly DMing MW telling her "I just said that so one would find out"...

According to Kim, he messaged her before blocking her saying something like "The detractors are on to me, I need to block you for cover"
 
But that's what's troubling me, if what Kim says is true and what he says is also true (The part of him blocking her and calling her a catfish) then isn't the man digging his own grave? He obviously doesn't intend to pay if he is having that shitty attitude or maybe he is trying to save face while possibly DMing MW telling her "I just said that so one would find out"...

I'm still sceptical about the whole thing but it does seem indicative that Phil seemingly can't provide any evidence proving the story is wrong and instead throws out accusations that were dispelled weeks ago
 
if the entire thing is an elaborate troll why would he even address this, I mean I know it's because he's so insecure and cares greatly about what strangers on the internet think about him but it's such a ridiculous story if it's completely untrue and totally not worth someones time

and yet here we are with him addressing it for 15 minutes
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole