Business The Tokenpocalypse Is Here: Companies Are Scrambling To Stop Spending So Much on AI - Leaked audio from Accenture says a big source of AI token ‘chewing’ is people just converting PDFs to presentation slides.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1.png
Photo by Sebastian Herrmann on Unsplash, collage by 404 Media with logos from Microsoft and Anthropic.

Consulting giant Accenture is trying to figure out how to stop non-technical workers from blowing through companies’ AI token budget on trivial tasks like converting PDFs to presentation slides, according to leaked audio obtained by 404 Media. Across the industry Accenture is seeing “soaring token spend,” according to the audio.

The news highlights a major shift in the tech industry and other companies that use AI: the wave of uninhibited AI growth is over. Some AI providers like GitHub are now charging customers per token rather than a flat subscription fee, leading some companies to burn through their tokens. Uber recently capped employees’ use of AI tools like Claude Code and Cursor; that came after Uber told employees to use AI as much as possible and Uber’s CTO said the company had blown its entire AI budget in four months. And Accenture itself reportedly started requiring senior staff to start using AI or risk losing out on promotions.

It also undercuts the narrative that superpowered engineers generating mountains of code are behind the AI boom. In many cases it is non-technical staff burning through tokens for non-specialized tasks.

“We’re seeing from some of the data internally at least that it’s actually not our engineers that are driving the token consumption. It’s a lot of the non-engineers that are doing some of those behaviors [...] you were talking about,” Justice Kwak, Accenture’s agentic AI strategy lead, said in a recent internal meeting, according to the audio obtained by 404 Media.

At one point in the meeting, Kwak and Eduardo Salamanca de Diego, senior manager of product management at the company’s Center for Advanced AI, start presenting about what is described as “token ops.”

Kwak says he knows people aren’t using slides these days, but he has some. As he appears to be preparing to present, Stuart Henderson, Accenture’s client group lead, interrupts. He jokes he hopes Kwak didn’t just convert a PDF into images and then into markdown files. “I’m learning that’s one of the big token chewers,” Henderson says. “Turning PDFs into markdown: is that right?”

That’s when Kwak says that’s what Accenture’s own data shows.

“What we’re seeing right now is just rapid escalation in AI token spend,” he says “As companies start to scale AI, moving from like simple chatbots into use cases that feature agentic workflows and automation and then enterprise-wide deployment of some of these tools like Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex, we’re hitting this inflection point where AI is becoming material to the cost structure; spend is becoming very unpredictable; and leadership, especially at the CFO, COO, and CIO level, are still asking the question of whether they’re getting value from what we’re spending on in the context of AI.”

“It’s really not a niche problem. It is a problem that every enterprise will face if they are bullish on AI, if they haven’t already,” he adds. The amount of token spending is increasing “exponentially, as more and more people are starting to use AI.”

Kwak says after Accenture tried to get enterprises to adopt AI as quickly as possible, AI has reached scale in most areas in both Accenture and its clients. But with that scale is a new opportunity for Accenture regarding its clients: “to really think about token economics.” The bill of the overall AI spend is visible, Kwok explains, but attributing that AI spend at the token level to the value outcomes on the projects where AI is being used is not visible.

Finally, the “controls are just arriving too late.” Those are things that might stop someone spending a bunch of money on tokens, like budgeting or different tiers.

Following the Financial Times’ reporting of Accenture’s policy to force AI adoption or risk missing promotions, an Accenture spokesperson told CNBC, “Our strategy is to be the reinvention partner of choice for our clients and to be the most client-focused, AI-enabled, great place to work. That requires the adoption of the latest tools and technologies to serve our clients most effectively.”

Kwak says Accenture plans to formally launch a product called “Token IQ” soon. Accenture did not respond to a request for comment.

As 404 Media has reported, some startups have bragged about how much they’ve spent on AI instead of human workers. Walmart also capped its staff’s use of AI tools following high demand.

Article Link

Archive
 
Consulting giant Accenture is trying to figure out how to stop non-technical workers from blowing through companies’ AI token budget on trivial tasks like converting PDFs to presentation slides,
We gave a technology designed to enable retards to retards, how could this have happened?
 
Society has uncovered new and exciting ways to become even more brainless.

Students graduating High School without learning how to read, what they can read is handicapped by whole language, they go to college and can't do fifth grade math and now they can delegate every task on a computer to an AI.

Learning is obsolete. Be proud.

:story:
 
Proof of how fucking incompetent and useless almost everyone in these positions can be. Managers and consultants should be exiled to Pluto (still a planet, always will be, fuck you).
 
We gave a technology designed to enable retards to retards, how could this have happened?

It's even worse, they gave the tech to retards and then TOLD THEM MULTIPLE TIMES TO USE IT MORE AND MORE. The retards didn't even want it at first, they were forced into it.

Now they are panicking because they got what they wanted.
 
This is the current cost of AI while being propped up by government funds and competition, once some of the major players leave, enshittification will truly start and the use of AI will be massively scaled down except for very specific tasks so to not blow money equal to just having a worker on it.

Though it will probably still be better than what a jeet can do, but that's a low bar.
 
Consulting giant Accenture is trying to figure out how to stop non-technical workers from blowing through companies’ AI token budget on trivial tasks like converting PDFs to presentation slides, according to leaked audio obtained by 404 Media. Across the industry Accenture is seeing “soaring token spend,” according to the audio.
FYI: Accenture is a jeet outsourcing company that scams their clients.

Their customers could replace them with AI and for the first time, they would actually get what they ask for on time and on budget.
 
This has put a smile on my face.



My dad regularly uses AI for his job, he gets free tokens to use for his coding gig. He says he basically doesn't do that much work with it, amounting to "How do I fix this" along with 20 minutes of fixing the bot's answer. He goes through all his tokens of the month doing this shit, he says. This is not a worthwhile investment I would say.
 
It was always destined to have the same outcome as "manager driven" cloud adoption.
It starts off small, the a competitor starts a dick waving contest and other IT managers join in.
In the end, the whole thing just topples.
 
Just imagine if these companies went back to mainframe s internal token use,

Hold on phile I gotta que up my token spend for the meeting next week.

Fuck just imagine and office where its just ai sending emails to eachother why showing goon slop to the "workers"
 
Why would you invest in AI and then be mad that people are using them to make slide decks?

Slide deck creation is one of the most brainless and least worthwhile task a person can do in a day.
I use AI for my more tedious admin tasks, give it a few examples of when I did it manually and it can copy my writing style mostly. Is that not what AI was explicity designed to do?
 
It's even worse, they gave the tech to retards and then TOLD THEM MULTIPLE TIMES TO USE IT MORE AND MORE. The retards didn't even want it at first, they were forced into it.
I know of several companies where they introduced KPIs for "finding ways to use AI in your jobs". So all managers were tasked with implementing AI into their workflows.
Non-technical teams were limited in what they could do, but they had to do it or risk a talking to. So very obviously, "turn this PDF into a PowerPoint", "reword this email to sound more professional", "take meeting minutes", "make my notes into a gantt chart" etc were basically all they could come up with.
If they made "efficiencies" because they no longer needed some of their low-level grunts/admin people, you've now got people relying on it. Which is what the execs wanted. But surprise surprise it's now a problem because the VC tap is getting choked up.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole