Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread - Gorl Tawk's very own DMZ (De-Moidified Zone)

The reality is that neither the left or right "side" of UK politics gives a fuck about women and girls in general. Whether they are white or not.

The left is perfectly content with having women be colleteral damage for their pet retard causes no matter how much it ruins their reputation because of that, and whether these women are white or not. They are perfectly content sacrificing them for their infantilized fairytale idea of coexistence, multiculturalism and "tolerance". If you are a white woman that got groomed and abused by a muzzie or a non-white woman who grew in an enviroment that worships a sand nog pedophile whose teachings is reducing you to an incubator for misogynistic goat fuckers, that doesn't matter at all for lefties, because according to them asking men from a misogynistic shithole countries to get out of this mindset if they want to live in any western country is le hecking colonialism. Yeah there might be thousand stories of these examples I listed when it comes to women being hurt, but according to them this sacrifice is worth it because they at least get ONE feel good story about some random Paki or other brownoid man that was able to migrate properly and achieve his dream of opening the quadrillionth over priced middle eastern restaurant in London. The left thinks just because they believe that women should have the right to choose and work that they are pro-woman, thinking this is some exclusive value only found in their sphere, while they convienently ignore how they constantly mistreat women. They love to say "Listen to all women" except if its former Muslim women discussing horrors they expierenced being born and raised in this pedophile religion or white women who expierenced the worst of grooming gangs, then those are government propagandists. When they say that they mean listen to the either toothpick sized or frumpty hijab wearing danger hair who did an impulse conversion to shitslam because she seen a Gazan child being turned into ground beef by the IDF, because she has all of the inner knowledge of Islam and will tell you about it through her 2010s midwit social justice pop activism statements how Islam is feminist and pro-woman, because a man can get married to another woman after he deems his first wife as broken home appliance, and that second married woman can help the first wife with house chores and child rearing. YAAAAY SLAAAY 😍 💅


Rightoids don't give a fuck about white women and girls, they just want to use their suffering and trauma to fuel their gay crusader fantasies. If they "care" in any way, it's more because they see white women as property of white men and see that their property got "damaged" by other groups of men. If they gave a fuck about white women as they love to insist, then where was this outrage when a pregnant white woman got attacked, stabbed to death and left to die face down in the dog bowl by her (white) partner in Northern Ireland? Where is this outrage towards the fact that in UK , 2 women a week are killed by their partners? If they truly cared about white women and girls then they wouldn't be having grade A crashouts and explaining how it's way better for them to put up with white moids abusing them because at least it's not Muhammad doing it, whenever these white women and girls tell them "No, I do not want to be abused by either a muzzoid sand nog or a white trash chav". If you look at the report, you can see that the muzzies targeted girls who were already in dysfunctional or abusive households. Ask yourself, would these men ever give a shit about these women and girls who got abused in their own households by somebody else in a scenario where they didn't got abused by muzzies? The answer is no, because your average rigthoid's responses to white men abusing and hurting white women is "Yeah thats fucked up but..Native crime like this inevitable dood, what are we supposed to do about it" or channel their bloodthirst that they would usually channel into writing their faggy little deus vult fanfiction about killing muzzies by suggesting to just kill the guy, sounding no different than the most shariah loving muzzoid who they like to pretend they are above whose response to anything is violence, it's not different than how an American moid fantasizes about his home being invaded and his family being put in danger, because at least in that scenario he gets use his glock and fulfill the fantasy of killing somebody. This performative outrage means nothing to me, because I know the usual suspects who are doing it now will return to writing posts how women shouldn't be able to vote and work and how it's their empathy that's killing the west in a week.

To men that cry about how feminists' response to this is that this is a man problem, rather than a race problem and how it's hecking misandry;
Cry about it in some other thread because I know you will and slit your own dick.

Since dawn of time, men have been writing essays on why age of consent and them not being allowed to molest children is oppressing their nature, whether it's manlet Greek ""philosophers"" from millenia ago or French "philosophers" from 20th century. Meanwhile women such as the American Suffragists were the ones fighting for increased ages of consent across USA because Christian men couldn't stop sticking their dicks into girls or trying to marry them to gain their fortune . We also have many other cases of child trafficking and sexual abuse such as the Epstein fiasco, which I will remind you of that many men here that are pretending to be outraged about grooming gangs were the ones handwaving it and saying it's bullshit because their favorite pedophiles that they worship were featured in it.

Now, they can cope and say "Well those were just elites, regular normal men would never do something like that", if that is the case then why every few months we have some big expose about some telegram group that has thousands of regular men recording and sharing images of women and children with other men, or sites such as Motherless who were full of again, regular men uploading footage of themselves assaulting their girlfriends and wives, or how about "regular men" who were using grok to not only strip women off their clothing but also children with it too? Or how about the "regular men" who shown up to rape drugged up Gisele Pelicot without even questioning the situation?

But let me guess, those weren't "real men". Funny isn't it? Le based transphobic men are the first one to believe in the concept of transitioning and transition the men that committed terrible things into something else through that statement.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I’m really sick of the white male narrative that they have never, and will never commit crimes on women. YES, Muslims (and niggers) are more likely to do it. But I really do not like the rhetoric.

Males, in general, are a danger to us. Some more than others, yes. But I’m not going to sit here and say, “Golly, he’s a white man, he’s not going to hurt me!” Like that danger doesn’t exist.
 
That being said, the brown guys are much more likely to rape you. It is not possible to look at offense numbers and decide there is no difference between male populations, the difference in perpetrating rape are huge and most races seems to have a spike in a specific type of offending (violent stranger rape in blacks, gang rape in middle eastern/south asians, roofies & spy cams w/ east asians). These are useful things to know to protect yourself, and the level of rape in the UK would decrease if these guys were deported. The (majority) of victims who got molested by relatives or step dads would have been raped far fewer times without pakistani immigration and that obviously counts for something.

It seems like most of the men getting upset about the report want rape to return to a level that they could ignore rather than making sure it is taken seriously all the time.
Criminologist Ardavan Khoshnood and his colleagues investigated the ethnic background of people (men) convicted of rape and attempted rape in Sweden 2000-2020. 99.7 percent of the people who were featured in the study were male. At least 63.1 percent of those convicted of rape were 1st or 2nd generation immigrants (because 3rd generation immigrants count as "Swedes", the actual percentage is likely even higher). Mass migration didn't create the issue of male violence, but it has definitely amplified it.

The misogyny that white scrotes already subject women to in their own countries is one of the reasons why I'm opposed to mass migration. White women already have to deal with white men and their misogyny. There's no reason why we should also be subjected to the misogyny of scrotes who are even more likely to be sex offenders than white scrotes.
My main irritation with the discourse is that the same guys that recognize you need to deport these dudes are also very eager to decry feminism, even though feminists were trying to solve the problem of police inaction for rape reports that was ultimately exploited by browns. They're super eager to blame feminists for everything but will never give any credit when the feminists were correct.
Julie Bindel, radical feminist, was the first journalist to investigate the issue and publish an article on the subject back in 2007. She even made it clear that the gangs were overwhelmingly made up of Pakistani moids and that this was one of the reasons why the police and the social services were trying to cover it up. Yet, I see moids cry "where are the feminists?" in the current year +11, while posting about how women shouldn't vote and praising men like Rupert Lowe and Elon as if they did the whole job exposing the Paki grooming gangs. It's great that Rupert Lowe has released that report now, but where was he in 2007? As for Elon "Infinity Indians" Musk, he's done jack shit except shit out xeets.
 
Why are there men in this thread

They appear every damn time it seems to them the world has turned a bit more darker and bleaker place for women, than it already was. As if they wanted to boast about a small collective victory of *their side* in some retarded competition or war. Retards and morons in general just love to hear about a smaller and/or weaker subject being fucked over by someone *BIG* and *POWERFUL*, not many other things bring them a greater joy, at any cost.
Bad news for them, detailed info about already infamous rape gangs being uncovered to the public is not the win they likely think it is.
 
Criminologist Ardavan Khoshnood and his colleagues investigated the ethnic background of people (men) convicted of rape and attempted rape in Sweden 2000-2020. 99.7 percent of the people who were featured in the study were male. At least 63.1 percent of those convicted of rape were 1st or 2nd generation immigrants (because 3rd generation immigrants count as "Swedes", the actual percentage is likely even higher)
That is an impressive stat considering only 30 % of swedes are foreign-born. Turns out swedes aren't allowed to keep data on race like the US does, you know, so it's hard to draw any conclusions based on that alone. Darn, trust me, I really wanted this win for your Swedish point... but if 35% of those considered "immigrants" are white, then my math shows 40% of rape are actually by non-whites, and that's a whole lot less impressive for the whole "white men gud on rape" thing.
 
The penalty for rape in Swedish law btw 2-6 years, child or aggravated rape sentences are 5-10 years—all with mandatory parole after 2/3rd of the sentence is served.

So the maximum penalty if convicted of the highest degree of rape, ~6 years.

Why not form a rape gang?
 
Criminologist Ardavan Khoshnood and his colleagues investigated the ethnic background of people (men) convicted of rape and attempted rape in Sweden 2000-2020. 99.7 percent of the people who were featured in the study were male. At least 63.1 percent of those convicted of rape were 1st or 2nd generation immigrants (because 3rd generation immigrants count as "Swedes", the actual percentage is likely even higher). Mass migration didn't create the issue of male violence, but it has definitely amplified it.

A conviction is an outcome, we cannot measure incidence by looking at convictions. We know that worldwide, acquaintance rape is far more common than stranger rape. Only in 2018, towards the end of the study period, did Sweden "recognise sex without consent as rape". Rape Victims’ Perceptions of Quality of Encounters With the Swedish Police found that in their study group, only 15% of victims were unacquainted with their attacker and "Although Swedish police conduct a preliminary investigation in 94% of reported cases, only approximately 5% of rape charges result in a conviction".

Even if 100% of the 4,032 convictions identified by the study are convictions of immigrants, that covers less than 5% of rapes committed during the study period. At most, the study provides evidence that immigrants are more likely to commit stranger rape. The increased incidence of stranger rape by immigrants could correlate with a decrease in acquaintance rape because the immigrants are not integrated into the community.

Julie Bindel, radical feminist, was the first journalist to investigate the issue and publish an article on the subject back in 2007. She even made it clear that the gangs were overwhelmingly made up of Pakistani moids and that this was one of the reasons why the police and the social services were trying to cover it up.

Julie Bindel disagrees with her work being used in a conversation about race. As she wrote in the victims of sex gangs are never heard (emphasis mine):

It is my firm belief, based on interviews with a number of victims, family members, campaigners and professionals such as police and social workers, that where the gangs are of Asian origin there has been a tendency in some areas of England to ignore the issue for fear of being branded racist. I have also been clear that ethnicity of perpetrators is indeed relevant, in that folk seem to be more interested and appalled by criminal gangs raping girls when the gang is Asian. Contrary to what the British National party would have us believe, this is not an epidemic of Pakistani child abusers abusing white girls – it is more that we as a society ignore the voices of those who know best about child abuse: the victims and their advocates.

And concludes:

Why have they been sidelined once again in favour of a good old ruck about race?

There's no reason why we should also be subjected to the misogyny of scrotes who are even more likely to be sex offenders than white scrotes.

The dangerous immigrants are male immigrants. The most dangerous man is the man in your house.
 
Why have they been sidelined once again in favour of a good old ruck about race?
Perhaps to distract from how the based conservative president they love to suck off is a civilly liable but not convicted rapist because a male judge and a male lawyer got him off and a jury of six men and three women said he did it but something something justice? :thinking: (second-gen immigrant btw)
 
The penalty for rape in Swedish law btw 2-6 years, child or aggravated rape sentences are 5-10 years—all with mandatory parole after 2/3rd of the sentence is served.

So the maximum penalty if convicted of the highest degree of rape, ~6 years.
I've always disagreed with how these "progressive countries" handle sex offenders. You can't rehabilitate a rapist. Anyone who grows up in a country like sweden has received adequate sex ed and lectures on consent in school. Theres only so much you can do to tell people "x thing is bad and evil and if you do it it has bad consequences" and if they still don't get it, they'll never get it. I don't have a paper on this but a ton of sex offenders are repeat offenders who get a slap on the wrist and then go back to committing the same crime. you just have to ban them from society to protect other people.
-------------
If you guys simply ignored these people instead of replying it would make my job a lot easier.

Edit: Yeah I'm not going to spend 30 minutes cleaning this up so in the future just know if you reply it means they get to stay in the thread.
Could you please remove the Dip Shitty Knights post with no replies? thanks.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I’m really sick of the white male narrative that they have never, and will never commit crimes on women. YES, Muslims (and niggers) are more likely to do it. But I really do not like the rhetoric.
The only time white men reliably get outraged en masse about the sexual abuse or exploitation of white women and girls is when there’s a race war angle to it. Good luck getting them to notice or care about the severity of these issues in any other context.

Don’t get me wrong, I 100% believe that white/western culture is far better for women than the alternatives, and there is zero downside to mass deporting rapefugees. I’m sure a number of decent individual white men reacted with genuine horror at the extreme abuse of little girls that the exposé on the UK Muslim rape gangs brought to light. But the overall rage is far more focused on white men feeling humiliated by inferior third world savages in their own backyard than anything else.

White men are trying to cope by patting themselves on the back for doing nothing. They fail to protect their women from violent invaders, so all they have going for them at the moment is to loudly insist that they’re statistically less degenerate on average than inbred goat herders who grew up in the slums of Rapeistan. Congratulations on clearing that incredibly high bar. We’re all very impressed.
 
The reality is that neither the left or right "side" of UK politics gives a fuck about women and girls in general. Whether they are white or not.
Maybe you're right. But at least a side effect of being an epic racist improves material conditions for women somewhat, whether intentional or otherwise

'ate pakis
Luv me mum
Simple as
 
My bad I thought we established this was a moid free zone per the title. Or demoidified which would mean more immediate removal of shit stains. Free speech vs truth in advertising.
 
Are you Android? Lmao

Uh, he doesn’t tho. He has banned pedos and rapists when it’s obvious. I’m not going to say I agree with everything Josh says. But I appreciate him giving us a forum to shit talk men (and everyone else).
 
Sorry to interrupt users who thought this was the Defend White Men's Honor Thread, but people like you are the problem. You are that rape apologist who thinks any woman who says she was abused by a white man must be lying because NOOO THEY WOULD NEVER DO THAT, ONLY SHITSKINS DO THAT!!! You pretend accusations against white men must always have a hidden agenda behind them and they could never be true.

A lot of non-whites make the exact same argument, pretending rape accusations against them are just raycis. The only thing causing these differences in sex offense statistics is because whites have cultures and laws where there are at least some consequences for violence against women, while others don't. Women's rights made white men more civilized. So yes, there is nothing inherently less rapey about you than a Taliban member. The essence of man is evil, they will commit as many atrocities as they can get away with.
 
The US only outlawed marital rape in 1970s- only became federally criminal in 1993, doesn't stop a lot of them from still doing it though. Be racist but the idea that white men are better on rape is laughably retarded
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole