Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread - Gorl Tawk's very own DMZ (De-Moidified Zone)

Men on friendships


Wyświetl załącznik 9152842Wyświetl załącznik 9152841


:...Tend to be more transactional ..." basically summed up the male view on relationships in general. BUT WHAT I GET FROM OTHERS
Does enjoying an activity together count as transactional? If they only hang out in the context of watching sports or playing video games and they wouldn't visit each other in the hospital or attend the funeral of their parent, I would say it's a shallow relationship that doesn't qualify as a friendship. But it's not exactly transactional.
 
Does enjoying an activity together count as transactional? If they only hang out in the context of watching sports or playing video games and they wouldn't visit each other in the hospital or attend the funeral of their parent, I would say it's a shallow relationship that doesn't qualify as a friendship. But it's not exactly transactional.
I mean isnt the definition of transactional relationship until inconvenience breaks you apart? They have fun together but they barely know their wifes names or if they are married nor care to check on them if they miss a match or dont show up one day .
 
Does enjoying an activity together count as transactional? If they only hang out in the context of watching sports or playing video games and they wouldn't visit each other in the hospital or attend the funeral of their parent, I would say it's a shallow relationship that doesn't qualify as a friendship. But it's not exactly transactional.
It's transactional in the sense of "you get x thing, I get x thing" "I get some dopamine in my brain you get some dopamine in your brain" if one of them wont have fun then they just wont go hang out because the hanging out is based on whether or not the guy will be rewarded with happiness or not. "I wont listen to you and emotionally support you, that's gay" is saying that you don't want to do something without getting something in return. Hence, why shallow relationships are transactional because no one wants to put in any effort without the immediate reward return.
 
i couldn't even get past the first 20 pages. i may have had an uncordial rant about it to my progressive friends. waiting on the fallout for that one, but i'm just done with pretending. this is the result of tolerance and diversity, half a million raped and killed little girls and boys because brown people are so hecking wholesome.
 
I feel angry beyond belief for the victims of the rape gang. Never thought it was ever possible to be this angry on behalf of anyone else, but here we are.
What strikes me the hardest is that even as I'm reading the first three all share the same exact commonality- abuse at home from male parental figures. Even if the Sand Nigger rapists weren't there (which they get no slack from me) these girls still would have gone through horrid abuse for just being a vulnerable little girl.
 
So many problems with humanity can be boiled down to the fact, that groups and movements that intend to enslave someone and/or take away their rights, work united and tirelessly towards their objective, while those who want more rights and liberties, often argue, infight and slow down on details and nuances, which obscures the common objectives and goals. Guess it has to do with the less hierarchic and authoritarian nature of the second group.
 
At 14, Fiona was abused by a man known as ‘Rambo.’ He had entered Britain
illegally in the back of a lorry. Previously castrated in Pakistan as punishment
for child abuse, he had then fled to the Philippines, where he allegedly attacked
multiple women and children with a large knife – the origin of his nickname.
Rambo was locked in a room with two girls and subjected them to extreme
sexual torture. This case illustrated that, in some instances, the sexual abuse of
children was driven more by humiliation and control than by sexual
gratification.
Why are these people here, what are they doing in Europe?
I am so fucking sick about these savages from the middle east fucking everything up. I couldn't think about anything positive coming from that area and yet the old fucks in power seem hellbent on importing more and more of these people to us. If I never see another person from there it still wouldn't be enough. They are fucking everywhere and they have absolutely no interest in integrating to the cultures hosting them. I don't want to have to think about that area any more and yet it is responsible for so much fucking pain around me. The only reason I can see is that men just don't suffer under """""the culture"""" from these places to the same degree as we do, so come on another fresh million brown men straight into the streets of Europe.

Fuck em and fuck the people enabling this shit. You would think a document like that would cause a huge scandal but all I hear is "Yeah the guy sharing it is a right-winger so its probably all made up" in the media.
 
I saw all this growing up in the 90s in Russia. Do what you want in your own countries, but anyone who says Communism was bad for Russia is a solzhenitsyn child rapist.

Another notable thing is how the rapy exists to facilitate rape. Rape dismissed as "personality disorder" (no such thing) or "dissociative personality disorder" (no such thing) or generic muhmentalhealth (several times, victims of both sexes), girl raped in the rapy and her stay in the rapy is used as proof she's a liar, protective father accused of "emotional abuse", care homes just pimping out children.

Screenshot_20260616_215207.png
^ rape in entertainment is just porn, always has been.
 

Interesting reading some of these comments.I agree that women should have a choice on either being a trad wife or being a woman who goes to work and gets her own paycheck.I would fully agree that both genders should have that choice....but women overwhelmingly don't give men that choice.The same argument that many women state about not wanting to be placed in a box is the same box that men are forced to be in by them.If a man doesn't work, there is no such thing as a trad man. He gets no girlfriend, no wife, no children. And to take it a step further many women will be disgusted by him and the paycheck better be substantial enough. And this is not even a gold digger type of woman.Even though many men would in fact work....the point is the "choice"....and that is taken away from men from the get go. And this is what women are fighting for " choice".

Retarded comment found in the wild. Basically, some men want to be a provider, and are able to find women who want to be a tradwife. Some women want to work, and are able to find men who want a relationship with a woman who works. But, women generally don't want to be a provider to a man, (to which there are exceptions of course but quite rare), and this example of everyone getting a choice in how they live their lives is actually a case of male oppression. What if he wants to be a stay-at-home husband and can't find any women his age / of the attractiveness he wants who wants this? Then that actually means he doesn't get a choice and women are oppressing him.
I'm sure a lot of them believe this bullshit, I don't know what the argument is here; women should be forced to stay at home at the mercy of a man and not be allowed to take care of themselves, because men can't find the woman they're entitled to who wants to provide for them? Should women be assigned a husband by the government and forced to be either a slave to a man or forced to provide for a man depending on what he wants? Wtf is my guy talking about
 
What strikes me the hardest is that even as I'm reading the first three all share the same exact commonality- abuse at home from male parental figures. Even if the Sand Nigger rapists weren't there (which they get no slack from me) these girls still would have gone through horrid abuse for just being a vulnerable little girl.
How many of the abusers were the bio dad? I wanna know.

I don't trust ANY moid. There are just too many stories, too much evidence and statistics, too many "exceptions". You can't even bank on a moid not feeling predatory to his own CHILD to feel safe.
 
Retarded comment found in the wild. Basically, some men want to be a provider, and are able to find women who want to be a tradwife. Some women want to work, and are able to find men who want a relationship with a woman who works. But, women generally don't want to be a provider to a man, (to which there are exceptions of course but quite rare), and this example of everyone getting a choice in how they live their lives is actually a case of male oppression. What if he wants to be a stay-at-home husband and can't find any women his age / of the attractiveness he wants who wants this? Then that actually means he doesn't get a choice and women are oppressing him.
I've seen this logic from particularly stupid scrotes before. One argued that raping a woman is no worse than rejecting a man because in both cases they're being denied freedom over their own reproductive choices. A woman being forced to have sex is the same thing as a man being forced not to have sex with whoever he deems his looksmatch.
 

Interesting reading some of these comments.I agree that women should have a choice on either being a trad wife or being a woman who goes to work and gets her own paycheck.I would fully agree that both genders should have that choice....but women overwhelmingly don't give men that choice.The same argument that many women state about not wanting to be placed in a box is the same box that men are forced to be in by them.If a man doesn't work, there is no such thing as a trad man. He gets no girlfriend, no wife, no children. And to take it a step further many women will be disgusted by him and the paycheck better be substantial enough. And this is not even a gold digger type of woman.Even though many men would in fact work....the point is the "choice"....and that is taken away from men from the get go. And this is what women are fighting for " choice".

blatantly untrue. some career women do want a househusband. the issue with most moids is that they just wont do chores properly. they will weaponize incompetence when they're lazy and not clean or take care of the kids properly and drink beer and play video games all day. women have tried to do this but almost every single househusband ends up a lazy entitled bum so they don't take that risk anymore.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
blatantly untrue. some career women do want a househusband. the issue with most moids is that they just wont do chores properly. they will weaponize incompetence when they're lazy and not clean or take care of the kids properly and drink beer and play video games all day. women have tried to do this but almost every single househusband ends up a lazy entitled bum so they don't take that risk anymore.

Also Domestic violence increases in heterosexual couples when the woman earns more money

 
Regrettably I am British.

I do not like the focus on the race, religion and country of origin of the perpetrators. The focus on the perpetrator's race is a convenient tool for white men to other the perpetrators, to distance themselves from the abuse. According to the white man, it is the brown man who rapes, it is the brown man we should be scared of, not the white man, the white man provides safety, the white man stands up to the dangerous brown man. You can let your guard down with the white man. End immigration, keep your women safe.

Visit any brothel in England, you will find women of every age, including girls, many trafficked from Eastern Europe, many trafficked within England, who are being raped a dozen or more times per day by white, British men. Visit any court, you will find white, British men on trial for crimes against children. An endless parade of white men who rape a trafficked girl are terrible individuals doing a terrible thing. An endless parade of brown men who rape a trafficked girl is a "muslim rape gang".

The grooming gangs covered in the report are heinous and indefensible, but they are responsible for a very small proportion of the abuse and trafficking that happens. Most abuse happens within the home, and outside of the home, the majority of trafficking happens in the open under the thin veneer of "sex work".


Good afternoon and welcome to the Home Affairs Committee. This is the fourth evidence session in the Committee’s inquiry on human trafficking. This afternoon, we will discuss the role of technology in facilitating trafficking. An important part of the chain of human trafficking is the use of online technology, particularly when it comes to victims of sex trafficking being advertised to potential sex buyers. Evidence given to this inquiry suggests that victims of sex trafficking are commonly advertised for exploitation on pimping websites, also referred to as adult services websites—commercial websites dedicated partly or solely to hosting adverts for prostitution.
[...]
In 2017, nine men were convicted of trafficking young Romanian women around the north-west of England for sexual exploitation. One of the traffickers was found to have spent £25,000 advertising victims to sex buyers on your website. Police have revealed that this high level of spending by one man on prostitution adverts for multiple women prompted your company not to refer this man to the police, but, to actually give him his own account manager. Could you explain that to me?

Many men are so wilfully ignorant that they do not even consider that the "sex worker" they are meeting is being trafficked, they do not even understand that they are committing rape. Many of the men outraged about grooming gangs are rapists, using their vocal outrage about the muslim rape gangs as evidence of their goodness, giving them a pass on their own misdeeds.

A single gang of Chinese nationals trafficked less than 10 women into England and forced them to work in a brothel over a period of 3 years. The gang spent over £200,000 advertising these victims on one website alone. At a minimum, over that period, thousands of British men participated in the rape of less than a dozen women, perhaps even tens of thousands of men. The scale of the rape at that one brothel alone exceeds what is known to have been perpetrated by grooming gangs.


Trafficking also forms one of the major routes into prostitution in Britain. The Metropolitan Police estimate 70% of women involved in off-street prostitution in London are foreign nationals, many of whom are thought to have been trafficked. Trafficked women may be told by their exploiters that they will be deported if their immigration status comes to the attention of the authorities.

I am not aware of any solid reporting on the number of men who patronise "sex workers" in England but I personally believe the number to be hundreds of thousands each year, perhaps even upwards of a million. The scale of that problem dwarfs muslim grooming gangs by many orders of magnitude but does not attract any mainstream outrage.

England does not have a public sex offender database, there is, however, a citizen journalist with a website, Red Rose, that publishes details on sex offenders. Some are immigrants, some are brown, some are muslim, some are white... all are men.

Men are the problem, grooming gangs are a convenient distraction.
 
White men care about violence against women if a transgender does it
White men care about violence against women if a black man does it
White men care about violence against women if a brown man does it
White men care about violence against women if a jewish man does it
White men care about violence against women if a lesbian does it
White men DO NOT AND WILL NEVER care about violence against women if ONE OF THEM does it

To them, they are the most virtuous and ultimate protectors of women even though despite being 49% of the white population, they commit 97% of sex crime committed by white people. They are only your allies on the topic of trans and muslims and don't care about you on anything else. They'll defend their own when it's their turn to oppress you. To this very day I see the same white men who call middle eastern and african immigrants rapists refuse to accept that Trump even being convicted of rape, is one. Where are the white men in the Epstein files? not in jail? thats a problem.

ALL MEN ARE THE PROBLEM, NOT JUST THE MINORITIES.

 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I just had an idea. why don't we women use NPD as a slur for moids like they use BPD for us? The reason why they use it for us is because more women are diagnosed with BPD, right? Men are diagnosed with Sociopathy and Narcissistic personality disorder at much higher rates than women. Both ASPD, NPD, and BPD are considered cluster B personality disorders so they're in a similar category of "this person is crazy" diagnosis, only that some of them psychiatrists diagnose men with more and vice versa.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole