Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
Now that Lidl Drip has left the site, can we remove the option to private one's profile? - It's making me leak.
Because you claim they hate women. Methinks they're like Tantalus who could never grab all the food and water to satiate his hunger and that makes them go insane. Like Audrey Hale cosplaying as the Columbine Shooters - doesn't seem to me she did it because she hated them. Methinks it's because she wanted to fuck them.
As you said, my Glorious Emperor, I am nitpicking. And I think you were wrong in claiming troons troon out because they hate women.
Historically male cross-dressing has been documented as a form of sexual fetishism going back centuries. The modern conceptualization of “trans women” emerged in early 20th century Germany through clinical studies by male sexologists, Magnus Hirschfeld being the main one, and developed completely separately from feminism. Propagation of trans ideology through the mid to late 20th century largely through male clinicians like John Money and the pornography industry rather than through feminist or women's movements which were criticizing trans ideology as early as the 1970s (see the transsexual empire book)
Yeah people got banned for being enormous cocksuckers that refused to abide by any restraint and never appealed. I don't want to deal with people who can't control their emotions. I don't get paid enough. I especially didn't back then.
Historically male cross-dressing has been documented as a form of sexual fetishism going back centuries. The modern conceptualization of “trans women” emerged in early 20th century Germany through clinical studies by male sexologists, Magnus Hirschfeld being the main one, and developed completely separately from feminism. Propagation of trans ideology through the mid to late 20th century largely through male clinicians like John Money and the pornography industry rather than through feminist or women's movements which were criticizing trans ideology as early as the 1970s (see the transsexual empire book)
What amount of male populations constituted male sexologists?
I'm well aware a bunch of no name weirdo male scientists who happened to be make fostered transexualism, but you're talking about a very tiny minority of men who the vast majority of men have no idea of the existence of.
No matter what 2nd wave feminists say about transexuslism, they fostered the idea that gender roles were social contructs rather than coming from biological innate differences from the sexes. This created the slippery slope of "gender is a social construct" that evolved to "men can become women and vice verca."
And if you look at voting maps, women as a whole now support transexualism more than men. Even showed women are more supportive of trannies in their bathrooms than men.
Voting is a way for men do go to war against each other without hurting each other.
Men vote because otherwise we would be embroiled in civil war every election. Men understand this on a subconscious level, women have not evolved to understand this.
Women do not go to wars and tend to be plan trusters more than men. There is nothing wrong with the way women think, it's just a matter of difference.
It's a problem when it is applied to large scale societal decisions.
Truth to be told, a lot of men didn't have the right to vote either unless they were land owners or if their IQ was too low.
There's no real reason for women to be offended at the notion that women shouldn't vote.
I used to believe that reasoning with them was possible at one point as long as we pointed out that if women are considered equal to men, women need their fair share of responsibilities.
Now I realized there is no reasoning with them anymore, repeal the 19th.
I don't think all women should be forbidden from being CEOs and leaders in general, I just think that like 95% of them are not cut out for being CEOs and leaders in general
I'm sure "feminism created trans ideology" is not actually just an excuse for infinite butthurt at being unable to keep/please a woman (see his 55 posts about how women don't like sex kek)
I don't understand why people cry about private profiles so much. When Redditors can't comb through someone's profile then that's great because combing through someone's profile is peak faggotry. But when it comes to Kiwifarms then doing so is your divine right and based.
Using such feature for banter is fine but from what I've seen its mostly used for chimping out at someone you don't like. If you got so bootyblasted over something someone posted (or even for giving you negative sticker for a post) that you need to go and shit up their profile then you're a massive faggot, sorry no sorry.
I would never hate women because I am a supreme gentleman who is always nice to the girls and would make a great husband, but the women who won't give me any pussy are whores who just can't appreciate a great guy me. My lack of success is most certainly NOT MY FAULT.
What amount of male populations constituted male sexologists?
I'm well aware a bunch of no name weirdo male scientists who happened to be make fostered transexualism, but you're talking about a very tiny minority of men who the vast majority of men have no idea of the existence of.
No matter what 2nd wave feminists say about transexuslism, they fostered the idea that gender roles were social contructs rather than coming from biological innate differences from the sexes. This created the slippery slope of "gender is a social construct" that evolved to "men can become women and vice verca."
And if you look at voting maps, women as a whole now support transexualism more than men. Even showed women are more supportive of trannies in their bathrooms than men.
The size of the group doesn't really matter, small groups of clinicians and academics have outsized institutional influence all the time, that's kind of how expert authority works. Hirschfeld wasn't a random weirdo, he was running the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft and shaping the clinical framework that everything after built on and gave the ideology legitimacy. Even today we see influential men like “Jennifer” prtizker and dr. “Rachel” Levine pushing for this stuff.
Second wave feminists were largely materialists who grounded their analysis in biological sex, that's the whole basis of their politics. The "gender is a social construct" argument was never meant to mean sex itself is mutable, it meant the roles and expectations imposed on sexed bodies are arbitrary. The trans movement (queer theorists) took that framework and ran somewhere with it that most second wavers explicitly rejected, which is why you had figures like Germaine Greer getting cancelled for saying men can't become women.
If anything you could flip the “gender roles” argument (like troons do) that gender roles being so tightly confined are what lead people to troon out, indeed what their ideology now falsely define as historical pooners are just women denied access to then male only occupations.
The voting maps is kind of tangential to your point because you said “feminism” created trans ideology not “women” but for the sake of arguing:
white women and white men don't actually diverge that dramatically. The idea that the average white woman is some wooly leftist is a weird internet myth that won’t die. The majority of white women voted for trump in all three presidential elections for instance. More to the point the most organized resistance against trans ideology has come from women, in the UK feminist campaigners just got sex defined correctly at the Supreme Court, and groups like ICON in the US are largely women led.
I don't understand why people cry about private profiles so much. When Redditors can't comb through someone's profile then that's great because combing through someone's profile is peak faggotry. But when it comes to Kiwifarms then doing so is your divine right and based.
Using such feature for banter is fine but from what I've seen its mostly used for chimping out at someone you don't like. If you got so bootyblasted over something someone posted (or even for giving you negative sticker for a post) that you need to go and shit up their profile then you're a massive faggot, sorry no sorry.
a private profile wont stop anyone from viewing your posting history, only commenting on your profile
if you view new posts the bottom section is dedicated to new profile comments and most of them are cool, sometimes even funny. its a great feature, only a faggot would disable it
Just pointing out that anytime anyone goes "le cringe genderwars and genderniggers" it's 100% of the time people who engage in exclusively womanhate everywhere and get upset about a couple users talking back or, horror, a dedicated thread for hating on men. No need to fall over yourselves explaining it.
Imagine if every thread about a male lolcow was inevitably shit up by femcels. Like if I went to the Russell Greer thread to go on an irrelevant tirade about he exemplifies male perversion and his existence is why men shouldn't be allowed to vote at all. This is what male KFers do whenever a female cow is mentioned outside of the BP. They don't even see it as off-topic sperging because it's so normalized. Men are allowed to be individuals who are only accountable for themselves, but women are expected to serve as representatives of all 4 billion of us on Earth.
Imagine if every thread about a male lolcow was inevitably shit up by femcels. Like if I went to the Russell Greer thread to go on an irrelevant tirade about he exemplifies male perversion and his existence is why men shouldn't be allowed to vote at all. This is what male KFers do whenever a female cow is mentioned outside of the BP. They don't even see it as off-topic sperging because it's so normalized. Men are allowed to be individuals who are only accountable for themselves, but women are expected to serve as representatives of all 4 billion of us on Earth.
Reddit also recently allowed private profiles and it only made the shit hole astronomically worse. Now you can’t even watch sommeliers accidentally argue with piss drinkers because it’s all just 5+ year old blank profiles sperging about.
I still believe that all profiles should have an active/viewable webpage with users simply having more options to remove information/interaction in their settings. There’s no reason that clicking on profiles should feel like clicking on a broken link.
