US State Department Uncovers ‘Birth Tourism Networks’ Across The World - A U.S. embassy uncovered a "sophisticated birth tourism network" wherein more than 100 foreign nationals were using fraudulent documents to get visas.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.dailywire.com/news/excl...overs-birth-tourism-networks-across-the-world (A)

WASHINGTON — The State Department has uncovered several birth tourism networks around the world, The Daily Wire can first report.

Under guidance from the State Department to be on high alert about fraudulent documentation, U.S. embassies in West Africa, Europe, and North Africa found evidence of multiple plans to produce fraudulent documents and facilitate individuals traveling to the United States to give birth within American borders, The Daily Wire has learned.

In West Africa, a U.S. embassy uncovered a “sophisticated birth tourism network” wherein more than 100 foreign nationals were using fraudulent documents to obtain visas and secure U.S. citizenship for their children. The State Department shut down this birth tourism network and revoked the foreign nationals’ visas. State is also coordinating with local authorities to “systematically identify and cut off any similar operations.”

“Under President Trump, the State Department is defending the integrity of U.S. citizenship by ending illegal birth tourism schemes,” said State Department messaging viewed by The Daily Wire. “No foreigner is permitted to obtain a visitor visa for the primary purpose of acquiring U.S. citizenship for a child by giving birth in the U.S.”

A U.S. embassy in Europe found that more than 400 suspected birth tourism cases had occurred since 2024. In this case, investigators traced the birth tourism to at least six companies that were coaching applicants on what to say in their visa interviews, arranging housing, and setting up delivery plans. State again shut down the process, revoked the visas, and permanently banned “several fraudsters from traveling to the United States ever again.”

An embassy in North Africa revoked more than 100 visas for “birth tourist” parents who came to the United States specifically to give birth to children who would get U.S. citizenship. State Department consular officers worked with law enforcement and used data analytics to identify the networks abusing the visa system in this case.

“A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right,” the State Department messaging said. “The State Department is taking action around the world to stop this abuse, dismantle birth tourism networks, and hold accountable those who try to scam our system.”

The Daily Wire previously investigated eyebrow-raising cases of birth tourism in Texas, where the state sued De’Ai Postpartum Care Center in Houston for “exploiting birthright citizenship by unlawfully facilitating the invasion of Chinese nationals … for the sole purpose of giving birth.” That center is accused of facilitating the births of more than 1,000 American-born babies, as reported by to The Daily Wire’s Jennie Taer.

President Donald Trump promptly signed an executive order ending birthright citizenship after taking office in January 2025, but the order has been repeatedly paused due to legal challenges. The Supreme Court will hand down a decision on the order sometime in late June or early July.

“We are the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow ‘Birthright’ Citizenship!” protested the president, the day that the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case. He attended those oral arguments in person, the first president in United States history to do so.
 
It appears that according to the posted map that birthright citizenship is a uniquely New World form of autism. Most countries in the Americas have it, hardly anybody outside the Americas has it. Very weird.

Yeah, obviously the 14th Amendment can't be changed, so we're stuck trying to nibble at the edges to stem the hurricane of turd world elites paying brokers to come to the US just to give birth so their kid can sponsor them for migration in 20 years. I personally think that stopping birth tourism is possible without the need for a 14A repeal. That's obviously the most egregious abuse. Discouraging immigration, as Trump is doing, is another way of a 14A workaround that is effective. At least on this we're getting what we voted for, which is nice.
 
Something that really annoyed me a while back was when I watched a Stephanie Soo video and she was talking about how a lot of South Korean women, including her own mom, find out they're pregnant with a boy and plan a trip to the US in their final weeks to "accidentally" give birth on US soil. So that their son can get out of mandatory military service. I found it especially irksome because if North Korea attacks the South, America is on the hook for helping to defend them. And Stephanie Soo uses her giant platform to fund refugee programs lol
 
The legal reason is because, per the 14th amendment, they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Diplomatic privilege, essentially.

Edit: this is retarded policy and needs to be changed, of course. But that's the legal explanation of how things are currently.
But I believe the argument for no birthright citizenship is that an infant at birth is a citizen (except in extremely rare cases at specific times in specific foreign countries) of the home country of one or both parents, thus making the subject to the jurisdiction of their parents’ home countr(ies). Which depends upon the definition of jurisdiction at the time the law was written. I have read compelling arguments that at the time it was understood to describe stateless persons, which was the condition of a slave or the child of a slave unless citizenship was conferred and they didn’t want the descendants of slaves to have to individually generation after generation apply for citizenship in the US. An anchor baby is almost without exception not a stateless person at birth.
 
But I believe the argument for no birthright citizenship is that an infant at birth is a citizen (except in extremely rare cases at specific times in specific foreign countries) of the home country of one or both parents, thus making the subject to the jurisdiction of their parents’ home countr(ies). Which depends upon the definition of jurisdiction at the time the law was written. I have read compelling arguments that at the time it was understood to describe stateless persons, which was the condition of a slave or the child of a slave unless citizenship was conferred and they didn’t want the descendants of slaves to have to individually generation after generation apply for citizenship in the US. An anchor baby is almost without exception not a stateless person at birth.
No, anyone in the US is subject to its jurisdiction. We can charge foreigners for crimes, for example. But not diplomats.

There is no realistic legal challenge for the current interpretation of the 14th amendment. Most realistic legal authorities, ignore partisanship, woke dipshit or maga, say that this is the interpretation of jurisdiction as it appears in the 14th.

We need to amend.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole