US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
This is how I know you don't know what you're talking about, The current Brightline isn't HSR, it's regional rail.
It is HSR. It's not the fastest HSR line in the world but it is still HSR.

It was supposed to be a direct line from the theme parks in Orlando to the cruise ship port but because of a lack of taxpayer funds they didn't fully grade separate the tracks and it turns into a generic commuter rail line once it enters the Miami metro area.
HSR primarily exists for trips in the 100-500 mile range which is where it beats air travel because most airports are intentionally far away (FAA regulations).
For short trips, it's almost always faster to drive. Even if the train goes 200+ MPH, it's faster door-to-door to drive 80+ MPH on the interstates. With the train you have to commute to the station, go through security (many countries require this like China and you're a fool if you think the TSA wouldn't create checkpoints after the first terrorist attack on a train), wait for the train, wait at intermediate stops (which forces the train to decelerate, destroying its average speed), and commute to your final destination.
Not really? This is like calling airlines quasi-government owned because the government spends money on airport terminals.
Major airports are funded by fees charged to airlines. Some of that money was even used to build the Orlando Brightline station.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
labormarket_june9.jpg HKUrCS4W4AARNHA.jpg
The US job market is still showing signs of weakness under the surface:
Full-time employment fell -79,000 in May, to 134.17 million, the lowest since December 2024. This marks the 2nd consecutive monthly decline and the 4th over the last 5 months, totaling -1.04 million.
Full-time employment is also now below the levels seen in March-June 2023. As a % of total employment, this metric is down to 82.4%, in-line with the 2020 pandemic low.
By comparison, the 2022 peak and pre-Financial Crisis peak were 83.8% and 83.2%, respectively.
The US labor market is weaker than the headline numbers suggest.
 
It is HSR. It's not the fastest HSR line in the world but it is still HSR.

It was supposed to be a direct line from the theme parks in Orlando to the cruise ship port but because of a lack of taxpayer funds they didn't fully grade separate the tracks and it turns into a generic commuter rail line once it enters the Miami metro area.
"Just grade separate it!1!!1!!"
To do proper grade separation they would've had to put damn near the entire corridor on viaducts and the entire south Florida segment would have to be elevated. That would literally at least triple the cost for the entire project and it wouldn't even be that beneficial since the FEC right of way has plenty of sharp turns that can't really get softened unless you do a lot of land acquisition which causes lawsuits and increases the cost.
It simply isn't worthwhile for the time being.
It also doesn't classify as HSR, its top operational speed is 125 mph and averages 68 mph on the whole corridor. HSR last I chceked is 155 mph+. Also they're actively working on building a station in Cocoa and wanted to extend the service to the theme parks but Disney threw a fit and then Universal whined to the Orlando City Council and now the whole thing is paused for the time being because neither park wants the other to have a station too. None of that is Brightlines fault.
Also it was meant to become a commuter style line once it reached south Florida because of that aforementioned impossibility of making it go even above 79 mph.
 
Your whole religion, started by a kid diddling con-man who raped a 14 year old girl, is a joke. Find the ugliest fucking troon you can in stinkditch. That is what actual Christians see when you call yourselves "Christian". No, the fact you call yourself "the church of Jesus Christ" in an act of mockery doesn't make you any more Christian than when the 6'3" man with a chiseled jaw and an Adam's apple protruding out nearly as far as the stubble on his chin says that wearing dresses and putting on the cheap makeup of a prostitute makes him a woman. You do not pass, "lilith".
I view Mormons as the White version of Muslims, but they chilled out so I don't got too much beef with them.
Outside of Utah they just don't really cause problems, and while I don't agree with them at all as a Christian, frankly it could be worse. I actually recommend reading up on Mormon history, they did some goon shit in the name of America and I lowkirk kinda respect them for that.
They could be Hindus bro, it can always get worse just hope they find the right path one day.
And Welper's a good worm he ain't hurt nobody cut him some slack.
 
HSR last I chceked is 155 mph+.
Nope, the minimum speed is 200 km/h or 124 MPH. Brightline qualifies as HSR.
"Just grade separate it!1!!1!!"
To do proper grade separation they would've had to put damn near the entire corridor on viaducts and the entire south Florida segment would have to be elevated. That would literally at least triple the cost for the entire project and it wouldn't even be that beneficial since the FEC right of way has plenty of sharp turns that can't really get softened unless you do a lot of land acquisition which causes lawsuits and increases the cost.
It simply isn't worthwhile for the time being.
Yes, HSR is extremely expensive. That's why we shouldn't build it.
 
Nope, the minimum speed is 200 km/h or 124 MPH. Brightline qualifies.
In what fucking world is 200 kmh HSR? 200 kmh is considered by most to be higher speed rail. True HSR is 155 mph+ which is only achieved in the US by the Acela Liberty.
Yes, HSR is extremely expensive. That's why we shouldn't build it.
No, it's only expensive when you're working with a line that has to go through a 100+ mile long urban area. Most HSR doesn't have to deal with those types of conditions for extended periods of time because most cities aren't as stretched out as the Miami Metro area is. This makes other projects less expensive per mile.
 
In what fucking world is 200 kmh HSR? 200 kmh is considered by most to be higher speed rail. True HSR is 155 mph+ which is only achieved in the US by the Acela Liberty.
In Japan and Europe:
The European Union Directive 96/48/EC, Annex 1 (see also Trans-European high-speed rail network) defines high-speed rail in terms of:
  • Infrastructure: Track built specially for high-speed travel or specially upgraded for high-speed travel.
  • Minimum speed limit: Minimum speed of 250 km/h (155 mph) on lines specially built for high speed and of about 200 km/h (124 mph) on existing lines which have been specially upgraded. This must apply to at least one section of the line. Rolling stock must be able to reach a speed of at least 200 km/h to be considered high speed.
The first law defining high-speed rail was Japan's "Nationwide Shinkansen Railways Construction and Improvement Act", Act No. 71 of May 18, 1970.

Article 2 of this law provided the following definition: "An artery railway that is capable of operating at the speed of 200km/h or more in its predominating section."
The International Union of Railways (UIC) identifies three categories of high-speed rail:
  • Category I: New tracks specially constructed for high speeds, allowing a maximum running speed of at least 250 km/h (155 mph).
  • Category II: Existing tracks specially upgraded for high speeds, allowing a maximum running speed of at least 200 km/h (124 mph).
  • Category III: Existing tracks specially upgraded for high speeds, allowing a maximum running speed of at least 200 km/h, but with some sections having a lower allowable speed (for example due to topographic constraints, or passage through urban areas).
A third definition of high-speed and very high-speed rail[7] requires simultaneous fulfilment of the following two conditions:
  • Maximum achievable running speed in excess of 200 km/h (124 mph), or 250 km/h (155 mph) for very high-speed,
  • Average running speed across the corridor in excess of 150 km/h (93 mph), or 200 km/h (124 mph) for very high-speed.
And in the US, it's defined as over 180 km/h (110 MPH):
United States federal law defines high-speed rail as intercity passenger rail service expected to reach speeds of at least 110 miles per hour (180 km/h).
Source (Archive)
 
No, it's only expensive when you're working with a line that has to go through a 100+ mile long urban area. Most HSR doesn't have to deal with those types of conditions for extended periods of time because most cities aren't as stretched out as the Miami Metro area is. This makes other projects less expensive per mile.
Like CAHSR, which is built in a flat rural valley and is extremely affordable? You came into this thread all assmad that someone sued the government to stop them from wasting billions on CAHSR 2: Electric Boogaloo (building a rail line between Las Vegas and a random spot 50 miles east of Los Angeles).

By the way, here's the letter that you forgot to cite:
brightline-west-riff-loan-opposition-letter-1.jpg brightline-west-riff-loan-opposition-letter-2.jpg brightline-west-riff-loan-opposition-letter-3.jpg
Source (Archive)
Guys I know we're autistic and everything, but we don't need an entire page arguing the semantics of what qualifies as a High Speed Rail.
Better than the Jewsperging.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Like CAHSR, which is built in a flat rural valley and is extremely affordable? You came into this thread all assmad that someone sued the government to stop them from wasting billions on CAHSR 2: Electric Boogaloo.

Better than the Jewsperging.
CAHSR is an unmitigated disaster of a project that is thankfully undergoing some reorganization.
Comparing CAHSR with Brightline West is laughably stupid though, the Initial Operating Segment which is partially complete and goes on completely flat terrain for the most part will still cost more than Brightline West per mile ($216 million) compared to Brightline West which, despite price increases, is less than half of that at about $96 million and is starting up construction. Brightline West also goes through way rougher terrain and still manages to cost half as much per mile.
You see, the difference between Brightline West and CAHSR is that Brightline has an incentive to not waste time and money on bullshit since the companies existence hinges on completing the Vegas route as fast as possible. CAHSR has an infinite supply of money to play with so they can sit around and do fuck all because there is no sense of urgency.
Also it's a loan, not free money. Brightline would have pay back the $6 billion.
 
I view Mormons as the White version of Muslims, but they chilled out so I don't got too much beef with them.
Outside of Utah they just don't really cause problems, and while I don't agree with them at all as a Christian, frankly it could be worse. I actually recommend reading up on Mormon history, they did some goon shit in the name of America and I lowkirk kinda respect them for that.
They could be Hindus bro, it can always get worse just hope they find the right path one day.
And Welper's a good worm he ain't hurt nobody cut him some slack.
Mormons are evil fucks. Romney isnt an outlier but an exemplar of his kind. They arent White Muslims. They are White Jews. They will gleefully allow everyone to get fucked if they keep their kingdom of sand.

Salt Lake City is where you can see white homeless instead of nigger homeless laying in squalor so it has that going for it i guess.
 
Comparing CAHSR with Brightline West is laughably stupid though, the Initial Operating Segment which is partially complete and goes on completely flat terrain for the most part will still cost more than Brightline West per mile ($216 million) compared to Brightline West which, despite price increases, is less than half of that at about $96 million and is starting up construction.
The initial operating segment of Brightline West ends in Victorville because that's the end of the easy bit before you have to go through the mountains. No one will ride a train from Victorville to Vegas so unless they get the feds/CA to pay for the expensive part of the route, they'll go bankrupt.

Even if they did get the mountain pass built, almost no one will ride one from Rancho Cucamonga because all the car-free /r/fuckcars members who want the train live an hour and a half away (or more) (by transit) in Los Angeles.

The much cheaper and better solution to improving travel times between LA and Vegas is to add another lane to I-15.
Also it's a loan, not free money. Brightline would have pay back the $6 billion.
Or they can just declare bankruptcy like the Floridan branch of the company is about to.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The initial operating segment of Brightline West ends in Victorville because that's the end of the easy bit before you have to go through the mountains. No one will ride a train from Victorville to Vegas so unless they get the feds/CA to pay for the expensive part of the route, they'll go bankrupt.
They aren't building the Victorville station anymore lol.
Even if they did get the mountain pass built, almost no one will ride one from Rancho Cucamonga because all the car-free /r/fuckcars members who want the train live an hour and a half away (or more) (by transit) in Los Angeles.
Yes they would, people are willing to drive all the way to LAX to then ride on a delayed plane to get to Las Vegas and then either buy a rental or uber themselves around.
Also they chose Rancho Cucamonga for a reason, people who drive from LA to Las Vegas take the I-15 which passes right by there. Brightline West is built almost entirely on the I-15 right of way. People can simply drive on their regular route, stop at the station, take the train for I think 3 hours and then uber around or use a rental. The aforementioned air ridership proves that people from LA are willing to spend extra money if it means they can avoid the 6+ hour drive.
Or they can just declare bankruptcy like the Floridan branch of the company is about to.
Sure that's possible but I have doubts that they'll do that for Brightline West because it's a very profitable corridor.
 
Also they chose Rancho Cucamonga for a reason, people who drive from LA to Las Vegas take the I-15 which passes right by there. Brightline West is built almost entirely on the I-15 right of way. People can simply drive on their regular route, stop at the station, take the train for I think 3 hours and then uber around or use a rental. The aforementioned air ridership proves that people from LA are willing to spend extra money if it means they can avoid the 6+ hour drive.
If they're driving, why would they park and risk their car being stolen (it is LA) when they could just keep driving and get there around the same time as the train and have the ability to go explore off the Strip? Brightline West has no market outside of railfans and urbanists which is why they're begging for the taxpayers to fund everything.
 
If they're driving, why would they park and risk their car being stolen (it is LA) when they could just keep driving and get there around the same time as the train and have the ability to go explore off the Strip? Brightline West has no market outside of railfans and urbanists which is why they're begging for the taxpayers to fund everything.
Brightline is attractive to people who fly between LA and Las Vegas. People who normally drive wouldn't hate the idea because if you're going to Las Vegas you aren't exactly in the habit of cutting corners so they wouldn't mind getting a rental or some ubers all that much. They'd likely have a shuttle service anyways which they already have in Florida iirc.
Also Brightlines parking lots and garages have security systems so I don't see why they wouldn't when working with HSR.
 
Brightline is attractive to people who fly between LA and Las Vegas. People who normally drive wouldn't hate the idea because if you're going to Las Vegas you aren't exactly in the habit of cutting corners so they wouldn't mind getting a rental or some ubers all that much. They'd likely have a shuttle service anyways which they already have in Florida iirc.
Also Brightlines parking lots and garages have security systems so I don't see why they wouldn't when working with HSR.
Brightline West's own projections are that they'd only get 20% market share by 2035, which is not enough to pay for their $21 billion in estimated costs (which were originally supposed to be $8 billion). Since the tickets are much more expensive than a flight and the total trip time is longer, even 20% share is optimistic.

Biden gave them an over $3 billion grant and they're already begging for another $6 billion taxpayer-funded loan for a "privately funded" project.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole