Soyjak.Party / The Sharty - The altchan born from the ashes of /qa/; also a containment thread

Wyróżnienie
aout powiedział(a):
>Top-Secret inner circle
can some nigga fucking tell me about this i dont use this site too much
the thread is Furry Gorls 3 - Under attack its just furry art of women most of it is suggestive i think
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
i can DM you the furry porn us oldfags post there if you wanna :oops:
 
Cobblestone powiedział(a):

Exhibit D: The Great Emoji Schism​

The administration once spent four consecutive days arguing about an emoji.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
178556 - soybooru.com - ball emoji forehead_lines gradient nuurumoji plants_vs_zombies teeth t...png
I had a hunch
 
David Thoughie powiedział(a):
goy
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
hey man can you like calm down?
why are you so hurtful, we had so many great moments in DMs yet in public threads you always insult me :(
i don't see you complaining when i send you what i wear under my clothes.
are you ashamed of associating with me?
do you put me down so others don't find out about our love for each other?
it's 2026, nobody cares if you like trans girls, please stop this.
i really don't want to have this special relationship we have ruined
 
Cobblestone powiedział(a):

THE COBBLESTONE PAPERS​

Hello.

I am Cobblestone, former administrator, part-time janitor, full-time mistake.

For years I sat in the deepest administrative channels of the Sharty and witnessed things no user was meant to see. Not crimes. Not conspiracies.

Worse.

Meetings.

The public believes the site is guided by a coherent vision. This is false. The site was primarily guided by sleep deprivation, misplaced confidence, and a wheel labeled "CONTENT STRATEGY."

I am releasing this document because history deserves accuracy.

In 2024, administration became deadlocked over how to increase activity.

After seven hours of discussion, somebody suggested a wheel.

The wheel contained:

  • Add a new board
  • Remove a board
  • Add reaction images
  • Remove reaction images
  • Make the logo worse
  • Pretend nothing happened
The wheel was spun.

It landed on "Make the logo worse."

Three developers spent an entire weekend implementing increasingly ugly logos.

Internal metrics later showed user engagement increased by 2%.

This was considered a major success.

Users often assume internet drama emerges naturally.

This is incorrect.

At one point a committee was formed specifically to determine why nobody was arguing anymore.

Meeting notes included:

"People are getting along too much."

"Can we release a controversial mascot?"

"What if we make the mascot even more controversial?"

The project was ultimately cancelled after nobody could agree on what the mascot actually was.

The final draft resembled a microwave with legs.

Deep beneath the server was an archive channel containing thousands of forgotten projects.

Among them:

  • MemeCoin 2 (there was never a MemeCoin 1)
  • BoardGPT (immediately became hostile)
  • NuForum
  • NuForum Reborn
  • NuForum Reborn Reborn
  • NuForum Final
  • NuForum Final Final
Every version was described as "the future."

None survived contact with reality.

The administration once spent four consecutive days arguing about an emoji.

Not adding it.

Not removing it.

Its vibe.

Entire essays were written regarding the emoji's implications.

One moderator produced a flowchart.

Another produced a counter-flowchart.

The emoji remained unchanged.

Nobody remembers what it looked like.

Unknown to users, staff internally ranked incidents according to severity.

Examples:

Level 1:
Someone posted in the wrong thread.

Level 3:
A moderator accidentally pinned an image of a sandwich.

Level 5:
The server caught fire metaphorically.

Level 8:
The server caught fire emotionally.

Level 10:
Somebody suggested redesigning the entire site again.

Level 10 events occurred weekly.

Q: Why are you releasing this?

A: Because people deserve to know the truth.

Q: Is the administration competent?

A: Define competent.

Q: Did anyone know what they were doing?

A: Occasionally by accident.

Q: Was there a master plan?

A: There were several hundred plans. This was the problem.

Q: Any regrets?

A: I once approved a mascot design based on a napkin sketch. It survived for six months.

History will judge me.

Poorly.

This concludes Volume I.

Volume II will cover the failed attempt to create a self-governing forum democracy and the incident involving seventeen competing site roadmaps.

May future generations learn from our mistakes.

They won't.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
snca
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole