Confession of a trans masc zoomer - thoughts of a madman, because you love to see it

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Taking a vow for religious purposes is a conscious decision to choose a supernatural vocation (commitment to God) over your natural vocation and your natural inclination towards marriage/sex/procreation. It has nothing to do with an unnatural and socially-imposed fear of sex. People do not fast because they're afraid of food; they fast because the sacrifice of the natural good has other benefits. The people that are afraid of food have mental illness. These two groups are doing the same thing, fasting, if you take it at face value. But these are not the same things.

Not everyone has a natural inclination toward sex or relationships or marriage and that is not mental illness. It is mental illness when it stems from irrational fear.
But at the end of the day you're still not having sex or producing children, so wouldn't that be considered a net loss? I guess I'm thinking about how the reactionary ethnosperg could possibly justify religious celibacy while also lamenting the decline of the huwite race.

Anyway I realize this is borderline moai territory and this isn't the thread to sperg about it so I'll gonna leave it at that.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I think it's a little odd how consigning yourself to virginity out of fear of sex is considered a betrayal of both your people and your biology and a manifestation of mental illness, but if you take a vow of chastity for religious purposes it's treated as a noble decision.
Simply engaging with both groups shows that this isn't true at all. Celibate Christians are one of the most stable, stoic, compassionate, loving people out there. Mentally ill people being mentally ill are clearly to be avoided before they'll suffocate you with their insanity.

By the fruits of their spirit you know the people. Not by "but they're technically doing the same thing, so it's the same". That on itself is delusional on the same level as saying chopping off a dick because it's cancerous with no way of saving it and chopping it off to validate gender feelings is the same. This is, by the way, a common argument in favor of gender surgeries. If you can tell there's a difference between "but it gives me distress" coming from a cancer patient and a mentally ill individual, this is how celibacy is different from inceldom. By the way, from my experience, celibate people were never sexually frustrated either. Mentally ill were.
 
@NoCockatrice
Men have strict hierarchies that even they struggle with. That's how they define masculinity. From what I have observed, Irl they will know you are a woman and will treat you as such,unless you abuse drugs to look like a dude, which is bad and looked down upon.

In women's spaces, there's cliques too but there are some spaces that are empathetic which will accept you and will validate you.
Idk the way you talk about women, as a woman, is very icky. The places I hang out with are typically seen as feminine (gym, fashionspaces, makeup etc) I can say that these women will not see you as a man or even as friends the way you talk about "titjobs" It's very crass and demeaning. You want a traditional wife, these women want a man with his hardware attached.
Plus, whatever you are doing to your body and mind(mentally torturing yourself or drugs) instead of focusing on your education, it shows. You come across as self hating which as a woman I pity and somewhat understand but the way you talk about women is very icky and my sympathy is low because of that.
Women can do anything. That won't change who they are. It's gender norms that are instilled in childhood and very harmful. Women are scientists, doctors, athletes but they are women.
 
Look it’s another “one of the good ones, im conservative. I’m not like those crazy pooners/troons we make fun of” kf pick me pooners who turns out to be just as porn addled, pathetic, and attention seeking as any other troon. I’m shocked this happened.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Simply engaging with both groups shows that this isn't true at all. Celibate Christians are one of the most stable, stoic, compassionate, loving people out there. Mentally ill people being mentally ill are clearly to be avoided before they'll suffocate you with their insanity.

By the fruits of their spirit you know the people. Not by "but they're technically doing the same thing, so it's the same". That on itself is delusional on the same level as saying chopping off a dick because it's cancerous with no way of saving it and chopping it off to validate gender feelings is the same. This is, by the way, a common argument in favor of gender surgeries. If you can tell there's a difference between "but it gives me distress" coming from a cancer patient and a mentally ill individual, this is how celibacy is different from inceldom. By the way, from my experience, celibate people were never sexually frustrated either. Mentally ill were.
But in the end, you would agree that neither should have children, right?
 
But in the end, you would agree that neither should have children, right?
I'm not entirely sure why you're asking this specifically, can you elaborate? Mentally ill definitely shouldn't. Celibate Christians are not a monolith group, it's not just monks (celibacy until you meet someone later in life and start a family which may never happen is a default state for a Christian) but overall, if anything, they should raise children. Like I said, they're the most stable, stoic, and loving people I've met because they actually take faith seriously. Also going back to monks and nuns, there are plenty who specifically raise children, mostly abandoned.
 
To be fair, critical theory has as much in common with Marxism as Christianity has to do with modern Judaism. The marxists of old had absolutely nothing to do with gender theory woo.
That's fair, but when people call gender ideology "marxist", that's what they mean. I used the term post-marxist myself for that reason.
 
Philosophy and politics and other bullshit doesn't have anything to do with it.
You're justifying your entire identity with philosophy, politics, and other bullshit, exclusively.

You're very, very clearly a woman with EPE (early porn exposure) trauma who also had a run in with Marxist (yes, marxist) but more specifically since most people use "marxist" as a retarded buzzword these days, materialist ideology that through convoluted reasons I'm not deigning to explain here as they're not entirely germane, produces currently-reified-by-the-establishment unreal assumptions concerning the 'stickyness' of things such as identity, where nomenclature comes from and to what extent it has definitive power, and most directly relevant here, how much is of the mind and how much is of a person's actual physical makeup.

It cannot be overstated that the entire 'trans' and the entire 'gay' phenomenon in modernity were built on axioms that all fall apart under the reassertion of reality. You are a victim of a vicious ontology that convinces persons that their opinions, and their feelings, have significantly more effect on the nature of reality than they ever could. Now, if you'll do me a favor, re-read the last sentence understanding that this isn't about 'tranny shit' for me, as what I am saying applies to all materialist positions that have eroded our civilization and done immeasurable harm to society in fields from economics to formal logic.

What you have been convinced of is that your identity is somehow separate from your body and that you as a human should identify with what amounts to intrusive thoughts/obsessions and their product. That has happened to more people than you, and is why I said what I said. If you really want advice, you can either listen to what I've said here and go find a therapist who can help you with your trauma and your damage to hopefully somehow live a normal and fulfilled life (hopefully you haven't done anything permanent like cut your tits off yet) as again a neurodivergent woman who had experienced the horrors of EPE and what it can do to the youth of our civilization.

Or;

You can end up doing the same thing ten years later when you finally realize you were sold a vicious life-eating fairytale by insane adherents to an illogical, malformed philosophy that leads humans to treat their bodies and their very identities as if though they have no mooring in reality. Then ultimately attempt to put things back together, far later than it had to happen.


If there is one thing you take from anything I've said in this thread, and I pray you do, it's that you are a creature no different in makeup than a chimp, a fish, a beetle, or a bird, in that you are the entirety of what you are. The reason you are living a tortured, hellish existence is because you are trying to fight reality, and you will lose. Please, for your sake, don't wait until you lose. Forfeit the contest, and try to find out how to repair your life.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I'm not entirely sure why you're asking this specifically, can you elaborate? Mentally ill definitely shouldn't. Celibate Christians are not a monolith group, it's not just monks (celibacy until you meet someone later in life and start a family which may never happen is a default state for a Christian) but overall, if anything, they should raise children. Like I said, they're the most stable, stoic, and loving people I've met because they actually take faith seriously. Also going back to monks and nuns, there are plenty who specifically raise children, mostly abandoned.
I thought you were implying mentally ill people should reproduce, nevermind.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole