- Dołączono
- 3 Maj 2024
US Secretary Rubio went off on people saying US President Trump is "caving" to Iran and throwing away Operation Epic Fury:
Iran Crisis & the 2026 War between Iran and the United States, Gulf States, and Israel - Please focus on news and coverage, not argumentation.
- Twórca wątku Mister Fister
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
US Secretary Rubio went off on people saying US President Trump is "caving" to Iran and throwing away Operation Epic Fury:
- Dołączono
- 13 Lut 2025
Because politically if Trump takes Iran to the stone age and is "effective" by bombing dissalination plants, power plants and bridges. It would kill hundreds of thousands of civilians. So he prolongs the war to do economic damage to Asia and Europe by playing close and open the gate politics. As for a peace deal that is terrible for the global economy by ceeding the straight to Iran it further damages the world economy and pressures countries to buy American oil by needing to pay tax to Iran and slowing down commerce. Not to mention the election is coming up so he needs to look like he is doing something.
Cheese Squeeze
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 24 Gru 2023
And ted cruz said that all irans missiles and drones have been destroyed. Are we just blindly accepting everything the US govt says as fact now?
- Dołączono
- 2 Kwi 2026
So you're still saying that 26,000 JASSMs were fired off during combat ops?
- Dołączono
- 6 Paź 2020
Fox says that the current deal terms (at least the American version) include the transfer of all enriched uranium, not just the highly enriched stockpile, out of the country and the dismantling of all enrichment sites. Only once this is guaranteed will sanctions be eased. Likewise, Iran will not be allowed to impose its will on the Strait, no matter what kind of fake management org they try making a Twitter handle for.
If these conditions are not met, there is no deal.
If these conditions are not met, there is no deal.
- Dołączono
- 13 Lut 2025
Global suffering will continue until moral improves.
- Dołączono
- 23 Lis 2024
wow, paint me fucking surprised, everything the jeets and goatfuckers (including axios and reuters) said was wishlistium and bullshit.
no deal is happening.
- Dołączono
- 3 Maj 2024
Typical Zionist lies!
Iran WILL keep their uranium, they WILL tax the strait, and you WILL like it.
- Dołączono
- 22 Sie 2020
How would Ted Cruz know anything except how to kill couples making out in cars and mock the police for their inability to catch him
- Dołączono
- 3 Maj 2024
- Dołączono
- 17 Gru 2019
Freeze frame, you dense motherfucker.
As I said before, the size of the munition at 0:29 is too small to be a JASSM, JSOW, Tomahawk, or SLAM-ER, and furthermore lacks the "wing" geometry you see with cruise missile/extended range glide weapons, much less a LUCAS drone.
Even if it's not a gravity bomb, it's a short-range missile (i.e. Maverick) or a JAGM which need to be roughly within visual range (even if albeit not directly LOS).
Either way, it's something that must be fired from short range.
And speaking of short-range weapons, I see you're also too lazy to look up the literal straffing runs F/A-18s and F-15Es were doing:
US and Israel have hit a combined total of well over 10,000-13,000 targets, >17,000 if you take the upper-end claims at face value.
The US had some 3,000 JASSMS/JASSM-ER's, and maybe twice that number Tomahawks. There's simply not enough cruise missiles in America's inventory to hit the sheer numbers of targets that have been hit.
Furthermore, given the guidance and flight time, cruise missiles aren't even optimal for hitting the kind of targets like mobile launchers which need quick-reaction short-range weapons.
And the Iranian government claims to have captured an intact GBU-57 and other JDAM guide bombs.
The Iranians have, even inspite of all their propaganda, not even denied that America has been dropping gravity bombs, firing short-range stand-in missiles and doing literal gun runs on them.
I don't know who you're suddenly making obvious fact seem like some grand conspiracy.
If we were begging for a deal then we wouldn't be at an impasse.
America isn't agreeing to Iran's terms which is why no deal has been reached.
If we were "begging" for a deal we'd be more amenable to Iran's terms, not telling them to pound sand and hand over the HEU.
Ostatnio edytowane:
- Dołączono
- 3 Maj 2024
They have to save Hezbollah because it's their last proxy that can do anything against the Zionist Entity.
- Dołączono
- 17 Gru 2019
Before anyone brings up "muh Houthis", there's nothing that the Houthis can do that Iran can't already do (i.e. long range drones and ballistic missiles).
Hezbollah, and maybe Hamas & PIJ in a decade, are the ones that can actually threaten Israel's borders and (try to) overwhelm their short range air defense.
- Dołączono
- 20 Mar 2018
This may be the most incorrect thing you've ever said, @SaidNoOneEver.
- Dołączono
- 6 Paź 2020
- Dołączono
- 3 Maj 2024
MES all but confirms the MoU is dead.
Satellite imagery shows the U.S. Air Force assets deployed at Chania Airport in Crete:
U.S. officials are optimistic that a deal with Iran will be signed within days, but they also acknowledge it has not been finalized and could still fall apart, Axios reports.
Super-Chevy454
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 2 Kwi 2018
Drop the Hezbollah, no offense but they look more and more like a dead weight and a lame duck.
- Dołączono
- 31 Maj 2020
- Dołączono
- 25 Lut 2024
isn't it crazy that Iran is the one hungrier for more war at this point while the country (or at least one of them) that struck first wants to leave so bad, when was the last time you heard something like this?