🐮 Lolcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / Russell Greee / Russle / Brothel Prince / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

Wyróżnienie
Billy Beeple powiedział(a):
It's not even clear that there was "written consent" to electronic service in the previous case.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Court in one of its rulings said said Schaefer does not have electronic service. I suspect Schaefer told the court that he was aware and I believe the court can just say awareness is service especially if they appear on date and time specified.

What would be funnier is if the court rules that Russell's electronic service meant that 24 hour notice was effective on the date electronic notice was sent. Russ definitely consented to electronic service and his "I didn't get 24 hours notice posted on my door" is just bullshit. He admitted he read the ruling 48 hours before filing his supreme court appeal and reading the denial of the stay. Electronic notice of the stay being denied is notice. He was made aware and he said he was aware.
 
Useful_Mistake powiedział(a):
They finally made it public. Russ needs to pay them $250
Wyświetl załącznik 8761823
Interestingly, Supreme Court does not consider this as an appeal but as an "original writ proceeding". In that case they might have some limited jurisdiction
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

My reading of this is that they are telling him to follow NRAP 24 if it is an appeal or NRAP 21 if it is an original writ proceeding. They don't seem to indicate what it is considered.
 
Useful_Mistake powiedział(a):
They finally made it public. Russ needs to pay them $250
Wyświetl załącznik 8761823
Interestingly, Supreme Court does not consider this as an appeal but as an "original writ proceeding". In that case they might have some limited jurisdiction
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
A state Supreme Court almost always has jurisdiction over anything a lower court or administrative agency does, which is different than actually having a right to appeal to it. It is not an appeal as of right, like the District Court appeal Russhole already lost, but a petition for a writ that they can hear entirely at their discretion.

The chance of granting cert on a routine eviction where the guy openly admits he just didn't pay rent and got evicted is near zero, and even if they do, it would be a terse "retard you didn't pay rent that's why you were evicted."
 
Prokhor Zakharov powiedział(a):
My reading of this is that they are telling him to follow NRAP 24 if it is an appeal or NRAP 21 if it is an original writ proceeding. They don't seem to indicate that it is considered either one.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
They did, by chosing which timeline he is bound by, i.e. the timeline of an original writ proceeding. In an appeal, he'd have 10 days extra which he is not given per this notice.
 
Harvey Danger powiedział(a):
Right now, a judge in Nevada is feeling very weird, looking at the clock, wondering "why does it feel like hundreds of strangers are telepathically compelling me to deny something in the next 20 minutes?"
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Useful_Mistake powiedział(a):
They finally made it public. Russ needs to pay them $250
Wyświetl załącznik 8761823
Interestingly, Supreme Court does not consider this as an appeal but as an "original writ proceeding". In that case they might have some limited jurisdiction
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
3c90935e-93b2-43fe-882c-f434a9188661.png

wtf have we tapped into the Noosphere.
 
Prokhor Zakharov powiedział(a):
My reading of this is that they are telling him to follow NRAP 24 if it is an appeal or NRAP 21 if it is an original writ proceeding. They don't seem to indicate what it is considered.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I'm sure they have no fucking idea what exactly this Greetard is trying to do. Besides the obvious undo the thing that was already done that you have no jurisdiction to undo.
 
Watching Rekieta powiedział(a):
I didn't see that. It reads to me like a boilerplate "you didn't pay" letter that covers both appeals and original writs. I didn't see where they determined anything about it's character. Russ asked for a reasonable date for the fee and this says "within 14 days" but it was signed by the clerk so I'm not sure it's anything but administrative boilerplate stuff.

I suspect it will be rejected liek the previous (the Clerk listed "paper" for Schaefer service - not taking Grees word is smrt).

Will Russ treat the fee like rent - "I won't pay unless you order them to let me back into my residence?"
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
"If you're straight, give me money in 7 days.

If you are gay, you have to give me money in 24 hours.

The money is due in 24h."

Seems pretty clear cut to me. If this is an appeal, they cannot dismiss for failure to pay before 24 days. They told him they will dismiss in 14 days for failure to pay. That means he doesn't have 24 days. Ergo, it is not an appeal
 
Reminder: Greer is homeless because he went all-in chasing a ViaTRON payout, despite not even having attorney’s fees.
In what may be a world first, he managed lose his place of practice aka his apartment, as a pro se litigant.
He has, somehow, bankrupted himself as his own counsel.
 
Useful_Mistake powiedział(a):
Seems pretty clear cut to me. If this is an appeal, they cannot dismiss for failure to pay before 24 days. They told him they will dismiss in 14 days for failure to pay. That means he doesn't have 24 days. Ergo, it is not an appeal
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I think rule 24 refers to an appeal to IFP status that was denied by a district court. I don't think it's appeals in general.

24(a)(4)
(4) Notice of District Court’s Denial.  The district court clerk shall immediately notify the parties and the clerk of the Supreme Court when the district court does any of the following:
(A) denies a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis;
 
What I don't understand is why Greee hasn't paid. Didn't he get his money back from the District Court? It's all electronic these days, it shouldn't take very long I'd think.

Even if he didn't get the money back yet, you can usually get something like $250 from just about any money forwarding scam these days since it's such a small amount. But I wonder if his credit, and being sued by that payday lender, is so bad he can't even get $250 from the worst scams.
 
Prokhor Zakharov powiedział(a):
What I don't understand is why Greee hasn't paid. Didn't he get his money back from the District Court? It's all electronic these days, it shouldn't take very long I'd think.

Even if he didn't get the money back yet, you can usually get something like $250 from just about any money forwarding scam these days since it's such a small amount. But I wonder if his credit, and being sued by that payday lender, is so bad he can't even get $250 from the worst scams.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Maybe he blew it on hookers? Are there any left that haven't blacklisted him?
 
Crusty, you better hurry, you only have approximately 1 hour 37 minutes left to pay the $250 and get a ruling on your emergency motion or you get the spend the night in your car, at a minimum.
 
Russell was really confident that he was guaranteed more rent-free time in the master bedroom of the rental, despite paying not a penny since December.
Too bad he didn’t check the very statutes he was copy/pasting from AI, he’d have learned that he needed to be current on his rent at the time he complained of being too cold. Instead, his cargo cult mentality saw a Get Outta Rent Free! Card.

NRS 118A.380  Failure of landlord to supply essential items or services

4.  The rights of the tenant under paragraph (c) of subsection 1 do not arise unless the tenant is current in the payment of rent at the time of giving written notice pursuant to subsection 1.
 
East_Clintwood powiedział(a):
I love them tossing his bullshit on technical grounds instead of the merits because it gives him the tiny bit of hope that if he just learns to fucking serve someone properly maybe it'll work this time, thus ensuring yet more plightsperging.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Right now Russel Greer is desperately trying to get an LLM to tell him what magic words to invoke to undo the thing that has already been done. Unfortunately for him, these AIs aren't capable of reasoning and cannot correct the deficiencies in his filings and will only continue to regurgitate more legal slop that make Greer appear unhinged.

On another note, how does he have a vehicle? If he's not making rent payments and has no job, he's probably not too far away from having his vehicle repossessed again. Since he doesn't have a place to live he's presumably going to be sleeping in the vehicle. What does a repo man do when they show up to take a vehicle and the bum is sleeping in it?
 
Irene and 22 others powiedział(a):
On another note, how does he have a vehicle? If he's not making rent payments and has no job, he's probably not too far away from having his vehicle repossessed again. Since he doesn't have a place to live he's presumably going to be sleeping in the vehicle. What does a repo man do when they show up to take a vehicle and the bum is sleeping in it?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Likely a rental through whatever gig services he's working for.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole