I am not saying it's not true. I am just saying it seemed counterintuitive to my mind given that first responders and people in emergency medicine ought to know better than most how devastating hard drug use can be.
I'm really enjoying this pathetic groveling Nick arc
Leaving what on the table, a flaming paper bag full of dog shit?
"How dare people get their own bag! They should be come crawling to me for clout!
Images speak a thousand words, Nick.
Its time to turn up that Ad revenue dial, Needy Nick!
Hahahahahaha!
"Taking away the magic" means taking away the money... from him.
Everyone knows how devastating hard drugs can be. But the schizophrenic regulatory doctors have idiotic views despite obvious datapoints. To wit: despite alcoholism destroying livers and alcoholics continuing to drink despite the damage, FDA only approved hydrocodone to be formulated with acetominophen. 10mg HC/660mg Acetominophen (Norco) tablets had a hard dosing of 6 tabs per day or liver death ensues. It was formulated this way as a deterrent against abuse. Guess what? It worked. People started dying of hepatitus. So the ass covering move was to reduce the tylenol component to 325mg. and this would have ended jsut as predictably except fentanyl started coming out as counterfeit m30 pills. No more liver deaths = FDA success. Now they just have OD deaths at 10x or more because illicit drugs aren't an FDA problem.
He can't get a driver's license. He's way too busy driving for that.
It's weird, but I've met plenty of nurses and paramedics who go against good practice and even their own experiences in the field. Either they think they know better than everyone else because of their supposed expertise, or they view the job as a grind that they have to get through, not something to critically think about.
You’re thinking about it too logically. You’re right, they should know better in one sense, but drug addiction is more emotional. It’s a maladaptive coping mechanism. You see people all smashed to pieces in an accident with a semi-truck. You might take a couple of Hydrocodone. It removes the mental anguish for a while. Your brain will quickly associate the pill with relief, and you’re off to the races. Nobody starts with the intention of becoming addicted. It’s the kind of thing where by the time you realize you have a problem, it’s already too late.
The "I know better" fallacy claims all kinds of people.
Would he even be able to get a new license with all the outstanding penalties he wracked up?
Would the cops even care that he drove without a license?
Doesn't Nick owe eighty dollars? Is he really that much of a broke bitch?
Like every ODD bitch, he won't pay it on principle, until he absolutely has no choice. And in this state looks it like they're pretty impotent about making him do anything he doesn't want to.
So whom or what is he going to beat people with?? Drawing tablet he never uses? Use condoms? Or a giant dildo naimed "Sir"?
Isn't this the same guy who once responded to being pulled over for speeding by telling the cops they were bullshit lying and to fuck off, before speeding off in a huff?
Like what exactly?
Of course it doesn't. He's a non-practicing, unlicensed lawyer who purports to run a show "lawsplaining the interwebs" where he actually mostly spends his time malding at some other dude's cooking.
Holy projection and lack of insight Batman
Self proclaimed social media expert btw
Yet so few people who've clicked on his garbage have stuck around forever, makes you thunk
Yeah there's zero chance this is true. Nick is like any jilted BPD bitch, stalking the object of their obsession in the desperate hopes they can find some way to get back at them. Eric July's offhanded (and entirely correct) comment about listening to his practicing attorneys instead of Nick absolutely assblasted him, and likely still does.
