US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

Wyróżnienie
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Dog-O-Tron 5000v5.0 powiedział(a):
He's a disgrace to that Iron Maiden shirt. Does he even listen to them, or is he just wearing it like a Zoomer who does it ironically or because it "looks cool."

Shameful.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
My policy is, if someone is wearing an Iron Maiden t-shirt but they can't correctly name Eddie in the design, I rip the shirt off of them.

And then I'm the one what gets in trouble. That's the justice system for you.
 
Persona Grata powiedział(a):
Reagan closed the mental asylums when he was governor of California with the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act

And even in the context of California, none of these homeless crazies are born here, they weren't the result of that legislation, and it's all democrat cope to blame their own mismanagement on someone else. We barely had any homeless people at all in the 2000s. You had to go to Skid Row or Venice. Now they're just everywhere, in every city. I'm sorry but I do not believe the homeless population reproduced and grew like Africans. And you can ask them yourselves, they're always from out of state. At some point they get a greyhound and come out here. It's the way of the homeless.

I personally don't like Reagan but the institutional cope is a state-wide lie that somehow went national. Federal moves to community outreach were owed to Willowbrook State School causing a massive nationwide controversy after the horrible conditions were exposed by Geraldo Rivera. They would've happened with or without Reagan, I suspect.

If anything you should hate him for amnesty and taking your firearms on the back of a fraudulent vote.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I thought it was the ACLU that played a bigger role, despite what revisionists claim?
 
H3H3 Podcast Higlights powiedział(a):

Wyświetl załącznik 8713065

Amazing! Commies always lying for brown people.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I love the fake conspiracy at the end. Way to own the chud Buddhists by pointing out that muzzies have their own calender system so the dumb math thing doesn't work if you use the Muslim calendar. Completely ignoring that Burma have their own calendar system too so the dumb math thing doesn't even work for Burma/Buddhist calendars either.
 
MaxPayne powiedział(a):
I think thats just you beginning to realize that this war is incredibly unpopular. I haven't met anybody in real life under 50 that views this as anything other than a disaster.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It generally has to do with how demoralized people are
For example, I have a friend, very "smart* in the sense that he could beat me in chess and can do complex math problems easily, but he cannot handle complex verbal ideas and lives in his car. My other friend who is unbelievably independently successful for a zoomer helps him out from time to time and helps keep him off the streets/unemployed, and all this guy can ever talk about is "woe is me!" and getting drunk. He now just works an assembly line job.

He is the one I know who really believes he was wrong to support Trump, and that Trump is a pedophile, because he's a schizo who believes the words of random vertical content posters. He is also convinced the US stands to benefit nothing for this war and accepts nothing else.

It seems that, among racially conscious zoomers, (I expect you just live in a liberal area), the ones who actually dislike this conflict are usually the most demoralized ones who are conditioned to enjoy losing, the NEETs, the schizos, pople who follow others because it is comfortable to them, but will be indignant if you point out they seem to believe what they believe because they have heard it repeated more times than you have repeated it.
 
Nefarious Elliot powiedział(a):
It seems that, among racially conscious zoomers, (I expect you just live in a liberal area), the ones who actually dislike this conflict are usually the most demoralized ones who are conditioned to enjoy losing, the NEETs, the schizos, pople who follow others because it is comfortable to them, but will be indignant if you point out they seem to believe what they believe because they have heard it repeated more times than you have repeated it.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
You could've just said Fatpacks.
1773746794401.png
Very high IQ response from Gavin Newscum.
"Someone is exposing fraud in the neighborhood? Better antagonize him instead of congratulating him for doing my job".
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It honestly comes out as another Mr. Metokur wannabe, they desperately want to have a big own or something. He even has a fucking podcast.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Nefarious Elliot powiedział(a):
It generally has to do with how demoralized people are
For example, I have a friend, very "smart* in the sense that he could beat me in chess and can do complex math problems easily, but he cannot handle complex verbal ideas and lives in his car. My other friend who is unbelievably independently successful for a zoomer helps him out from time to time and helps keep him off the streets/unemployed, and all this guy can ever talk about is "woe is me!" and getting drunk. He now just works an assembly line job.

He is the one I know who really believes he was wrong to support Trump, and that Trump is a pedophile, because he's a schizo who believes the words of random vertical content posters. He is also convinced the US stands to benefit nothing for this war and accepts nothing else.

It seems that, among racially conscious zoomers, (I expect you just live in a liberal area), the ones who actually dislike this conflict are usually the most demoralized ones who are conditioned to enjoy losing, the NEETs, the schizos, pople who follow others because it is comfortable to them, but will be indignant if you point out they seem to believe what they believe because they have heard it repeated more times than you have repeated it.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Vertical content creators, I like it, describes that shit perfectly
 
I remember back in the day there was some bill that was to give veterans from the Gulf War or something money for getting fucked up from oil burning, but the GOP denied it. There was a shot of Ted Cruz high-fiving after with some other Republican party member. I only remember this from reddit's framing, though. If anybody remembers this, was it genuinely the GOP fucking over vets, or did the Dems slide in like $20,000,000 for "queer" studies or some shit?
 
Twix Eatr powiedział(a):
I remember back in the day there was some bill that was to give veterans from the Gulf War or something money for getting fucked up from oil burning, but the GOP denied it. There was a shot of Ted Cruz high-fiving after with some other Republican party member. I only remember this from reddit's framing, though. If anybody remembers this, was it genuinely the GOP fucking over vets, or did the Dems slide in like $20,000,000 for "queer" studies or some shit?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
He fist bumped another senator when they were able to kill it off, but they killed it off because there was $400 billion dollars in unrelated spending, so it was one of those bullshit bills that tugged your heart strings but in reality 90% of the money was going to miscellaneous shit that they wanted.
Edit: I looked a little more into it and I guess they wanted to take $400 billion dollars that was already in the VA budget and change it from being discretionary to being mandatory, which would have opened up those funds to obvious fraud and things like that.
 
Lip Glossary powiedział(a):
He fist bumped another senator when they were able to kill it off, but they killed it off because there was $400 billion dollars in unrelated spending, so it was one of those bullshit bills that tugged your heart strings but in reality 90% of the money was going to miscellaneous shit that they wanted.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
ffs Daily Show guy was the frontman, it had to be shit
 
GamerGateSurvivor powiedział(a):
Wyświetl załącznik 8713524

irish cunt lady.mp4
Just a reminder that western civilization won't fall because of brown hoards raping their way through our lands. It will fall because suicidal traitors rolled out the red carpet for them to do it.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Ireland fought for its independence, just to cuck out and invite the hordes of Muslims, obliterating its culture and heritage. On the flip side, guess I'll get a shamrock shake today to celebrate.
 
WelperHelper99 powiedział(a):
Ireland fought for its independence, just to cuck out and invite the hordes of Muslims, obliterating its culture and heritage. On the flip side, guess I'll get a shamrock shake today to celebrate.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
No, WE fought for our independence and got it. The last time I checked those pussy paddys still have to call the northern part of their own island the UK. :story:
 
Twix Eatr powiedział(a):
I remember back in the day there was some bill that was to give veterans from the Gulf War or something money for getting fucked up from oil burning
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Thanks for...narrowing it down...
Twix Eatr powiedział(a):
I only remember this from reddit's framing, though. If anybody remembers this, was it genuinely the GOP fucking over vets, or did the Dems slide in like $20,000,000 for "queer" studies or some shit?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I believe I found what you're talking about. But it is from 2022, so I don't know what you meant about "back in the day" that's literally 4 years ago. It's called the PACT act, here's the bill In full.
US gov link
I've gone over some of it and it's extremely dry and vague. It directs a bunch of veterans affairs/gov departments to re/evaluate the definition/terms/reasoning/timelines for compensation due to toxic exposure. I didn't see anything immediately objectionable, but then again it doesn't have direct dollar amounts listed. I would need to find house floor arguments to get a better idea of what the GOP didn't like. If I had to take a guess, I'd assume that they didn't like how this expanded disability payments based on vague language. It passed eventually by the way.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole