Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Gobermental Supervisor]

5 decisions by Barlow today, and not one of them regarding us. Bro's playing

Imagine being the judge who checks his case dockets and sees the Greertard REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE about every little bit of standard legal proceeding.
I'd prefer working on all the other cases first too.

 

[Irene and 22 others]

Imagine being the judge who checks his case dockets and sees the Greertard REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE about every little bit of standard legal proceeding.
I'd prefer working on all the other cases first too.

It's his own fault for not sanctioning Greer for this behavior previously and letting him get away with it time and again. Notice that the docket in the Stebbins v. Moon case has not been similarly shit up despite Acerthorn being just as (if not even more) litigious as Russ. If someone has a new puppy and every time it shits on the floor its owner does nothing to correct the behavior, can anyone blame the dog when it continues to shit on the carpet? Someone should rub the judge's nose in his shitty docket and swat him with a rolled up newspaper so that he learns.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

5 decisions by Barlow today, and not one of them regarding us. Bro's playing

You forget that this is his absolute bottom priority case

Only after clearing the docket of every motion in every "real" case with actual schedules and deadlines will he even begin to check on this one. But if any one of those real cases with deadlines makes a filing first, he needs to run and read and deal with that before us, but by the time he has, another case has two more filings, and by the time he answers them, four more, and he has to slay the Hydra all over again before there's any time to think about looking at us.

Only if there's somehow a full MONTH with no court dates, no filings in any other case, or any other court dates coming up the next month, will the judges maybe get bored enough to yawn and say "OK, what else is there to do today?" and only if they wouldn't rather just take an unofficial day off

 

[Kosher Dill]

Only after clearing the docket of every motion in every "real" case with actual schedules and deadlines will he even begin to check on this one.

We'll see about that, I think there's a chance Barlow will try to "clean his plate", at least of the very oldest motions, ahead of the next CJRA report (through March 31).

 

[RodgerDodger]

We'll see about that, I think there's a chance Barlow will try to "clean his plate", at least of the very oldest motions, ahead of the next CJRA report (through March 31).

Wouldn't it be Bennet that has to clear the plate? Barlow might just send a backchannels message asking Bennet about scheduling and the calendars status. With the politely unsaid but understood "WTF is all this shit?"

 

[Kosher Dill]

Wouldn't it be Bennet that has to clear the plate?

Yeah, but Barlow's the one ultimately responsible for how his court is run, and he's the one whose reputation is on the line if he gets a bad "report card". As you said, this will probably mean he'll crack the whip a bit with Bennett.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

ECF 448. Magistrate recommends Motion to Dismiss be denied

 

[Your Starter for 10]

Another Greer victory, as expected. Hardin really needs to re-think his strategy. Stop trying to get these faggots to dismiss, and instead try and accelerate towards the inevitable trial.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Aside from the rule problems, this feels premature to Sony v Cox, no?
Also cool story Bennett, did Shitlips pay his $80 yet?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Another Greer victory, as expected. Hardin really needs to re-think his strategy. Stop trying to get these faggots to dismiss, and instead try and accelerate towards the inevitable trial.

R&R merely means Magistrate is recomending this to the District Judge. Mr. Hardin has 14 days to object to anything in R&R (and he should to preserve ability to appeal), and the District Judge can overrule the Magistrate. Likewise, the case can still get dismissed as a sanction for Greer's various noncompliances with Court Orders.

 

[DavidS877]

The magistrate judge has checked off his box for "Respond to Greer v Moon in 2026". See you all in 2027.
ECF 448 as Images.

Spoiler: 20 pages

 

[Dumbledore's Onlyfans]

R&R merely means Magistrate is recomending this to the District Judge. Mr. Hardin has 14 days to object to anything in R&R (and he should to preserve ability to appeal), and the District Judge can overrule the Magistrate. Likewise, the case can still get dismissed as a sanction for Greer's various noncompliances with Court Orders.

It seems like the court is determined to carry this shit through to trial. But we all know that Rusty isn't capable of getting through discovery, let alone to trial. It's going to be interesting to watch this play out.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

You are effectively prohibited from ever linking to anything you are discussing under Barlow and Bennett's theories. Can't have shit in Utah.

 

[Sneed Force One]

It seems like the court is determined to carry this shit through to trial. But we all know that Rusty isn't capable of getting through discovery, let alone to trial. It's going to be interesting to watch this play out.

I'd pay thousands to watch Greer attempt to depose Mr.Moon while he desperately attempts to avoid laughing.

Wyświetl załącznik 8547767
You are effectively prohibited from ever linking to anything you are discussing under Barlow and Bennett's theories. Can't have shit in Utah.

So if I link to an "unauthorised" archive of copyrighted data, such as Rekeita's cuck tweets, Elon can now sue me? Ridiculous.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

ECF 448. Magistrate recommends Motion to Dismiss be denied

Wyświetl załącznik 8547616
Wyświetl załącznik 8547615

So if I'm reading the Barlow analysis correctly regarding the server test (and then his 180 regarding the server test:

If I buy a copy of the New York Times and they put a copyrighted image on their page, I am guilty of contributory copyright infringement?

or

If I own a newspaper vending machine and NY Times puts a copyrighted image on their page, I am guilty of contributory copyright infringement if people could see the image in the vending machine?

really? That needs to die.

 

[Your Starter for 10]

No, I get all that. It's just all a waste of time and money. Preserve for appeal? For what, the appellate court has already showed they are 100% retarded and uninterested in either the law or reality. The judge disagreeing with the magistrate? Very doubtful.

This is realpolitik. You are dealing with people, not the law or evidence or anything procedural now. All of that is just a sink for time and legal funds.

Anything not directly related to sanctions OR propelling the case forward needs to be dropped or a single paragraph response.

This only ends when Greer is allowed to flail about insanely in public during a trial.

Likewise, the case can still get dismissed as a sanction for Greer's various noncompliances with Court Orders.

Do you actually believe that.

Edit -connectivity chewed up my post.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So if I'm reading the Barlow analysis correctly regarding the server test (and then his 180 regarding the server test:

If I buy a copy of the New York Times and they put a copyrighted image on their page, I am guilty of contributory copyright infringement?

or

If I own a newspaper vending machine and NY Times puts a copyrighted image on their page, I am guilty of contributory copyright infringement if people could see the image in the vending machine?

really? That needs to die.

No, but if you post on KF and link to NYT you are infringing on NYT's copyrights. Yeah, doesn't make sense to me either.

 

[Jew-ish]

This is pure speculative optimism, but I see this as a step towards dismissal.

Buttoning up loose ends before dismissal from sanctions, and making the inevitable appeal from greer harder to swallow.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Wow...that is....sure some ruling.

This judge has it out for you Null, for sure.

We might not win this one guys. It's clear the judges are not being impartial nor fair.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

No, but if you post on KF and link to NYT you are infringing on NYT's copyrights. Yeah, doesn't make sense to me either.

I think there's a missing distinction between a LINK like fuckyougreer.com and embedding an image - the first requires the USER to go do something active somewhere else; the second actively displays the work inline with the page.

I think it's a stupid distinction written by law autists who don't into technology, but it's being missed here.

(I also thing this motion to dismiss was kind of slimy lawyertricks based on trying to boobytrap the amended complaint and this ruling doesn't actually chap my ass)