What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

Pizzagate was itself a conspiracy to convince people the whole idea of an elite pedophile conspiracy was the idea of lunatics. Meanwhile the entire world actually IS ruled by a conspiracy of predatory sex fiends.
Well I don't know. I mean, the way it was presented by the likes of CBS news or the braindead mouthpiece Stephen Colbert, sure, but I was one of the people up all night digging into connections, downloading and reviewing the schizo infographics, weeks, months, before 'normies' had ever heard the term. It all started with the Podesta emails and connecting dots from that, and the revelations just became so insane, and it expanded out into looking into all of those bizarre Spiderman & Elsa youtube kids videos (that are still being made, by the way!), and there are even things I remember that people who were also 'there' for it back then don't remember, like, the Pegasus Museum, the Dr. Pong ping-pong bar in Berlin that had dodgy ties to James Alefantis and weird coded language/symbols, the website that was made to document the home birth of James Alefantis' goddaughter in graphic detail, and said something like "Welcome Queen Evie, be kind to her now, for one day she will hold the power of life and death over you". The list goes on and on, there was so much weird shit, and sadly, the phrase 'pizzagate' has been condensed down, to most people, to mean QAnon-adjacent bullshit.

edit: looking back on my own posts on this site from over half a decade ago, there are even things I knew before that I had forgotten now. The Nalu Diner, a place James Alefantis co-owned in Berlin, also came up, with odd ties.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Ok yeah. Why the fuck would anyone that hated her splash apple cider vinegar on her? At this point the only plausible explanation is a false flag. It would be crazier to believe someone who hated her decided to splash APPLE CIDER VINEGAR, on her. They could have chosen anything, piss, or idk coffee even, that could have at least ruined her clothes by staining them.

Anyone remember the similar false flag from a few years back? I can't remember if it was during trumps first term or Biden's. It was the Jesse Smullet (idk how his name is spelled), guy, that said trump supporters came up to him, and said "this is maga country", and I think he said they splashed something on him, or something dumb. Then it was proven he paid two african guys to wear red hats and do this. It was as funny of a story, as it was infuriating about how boldy they just lie and slander.

This is so similar to how that one played out. She truly is a lightbulb head, no normal person would see the way that failed miserably then try to copy it even more boldy, in 4k. The sad thing is for the leftists it doesn't matter even if they prove the guy was paid by her to do this. That doesn't matter to them.
Jussie's false flag was far dumber. His alleged attack in the "MAGA country" that is fucking Chicago happened when he felt like going to Subway for a shitty sandwich at 1AM in a winter storm with subzero temperatures and the evil African MAGA nazis supposedly poured bleach on him to make him whiter
 
I don't know where else to write what I am thinking without getting my account deleted or being personally attacked, but, in light of the most recent batch of Epstein files, it has been half-vindicating and half-frustrating to see a whole new wave of people, including a lot of people who were too young in 2016 to even know what was going on, saying that they now believe there is an elite global network of pedophiles and generally evil people, running the world. The frustrating part is when someone who was there in 2016 chimes in mentioning Pizzagate, and you can see in the responses from the 'uninitiated' that we will probably never get anywhere because the disinfo and muddying-of-the-waters back then worked. People think it's bogus, people think it was retards and schizos saying there were children being held in the basement of Comet Ping Pong, that it's tied to QAnon, etc., and even though you have this common understanding of 'the problem', all of these people have a completelydifferent schema for who that includes and what different terms fundamentally mean.
This is one of those things that I believe are a combination of "Pushed by those in power" and "Happens naturally and benefits those in power".
If people who two different concepts in their head about what something is, then they can't really communicate.
If one person says "Pizzagate" and they think of all the stuff that really did happen, that we know happened, that this person was there to witness online and in the media, they aren't talking about the same thing as someone who only knows the term "Pizzagate" from the late-night comedy talk show hosts who tell them the news.

Pizzagate was itself a conspiracy to convince people the whole idea of an elite pedophile conspiracy was the idea of lunatics. Meanwhile the entire world actually IS ruled by a conspiracy of predatory sex fiends.
It's like a said before: You can discredit things by going just a little tiny bit beyond what makes sense.

Pilot seeing a jet for the first time:
"I saw a plane with no propellers!" = Possible​
"And it was being flown by a gorilla!" = Impossible, the whole thing was a hallucination​

Now you've discredited a witness with just one monkey mask.
 
When I was a kid, I was consistently taught that Florida would be submerged by rising sea levels by 2014.
I went to high school during the 70s, and there was no "scientific consensus" about it, but there were newspaper and magazine articles, and segments on the TV news (all we had for information back then), and teachers in school telling us that we were "heading toward another ice age."

I also remember how in the early 80s, Acid Rain was the other thing that was going to kill us.

By the late 80s and into the 90s it was Global Warming, and the Ozone Hole that was going to kill us.

My kids went to school in the 90s and early 2000s and were taught the same, that Florida and all of the coastal regions of the US would be submerged by the 2010s. All the Polar Bears were also going to be extinct by then too because of the melting polar ice. Oh yeah, and all of the snow on the top of Mt. Kilimanjaro would be melted by then because of "Climate Change."

It's February of 2026 and not one of these things has happened.

Oh yeah: I still don't have AIDS, which I was told that EVERYONE! was at risk for, and it's not IF you get AIDS, it's WHEN you get AIDS.

I think this has already happened. I really don't think anything would move people to act short of things that affect their life directly like lack of access to food, and even then I think people are so depressed/beaten down that because we can't reach the people responsible, that anger has nowhere to go.
I think you are right. I still hear people talking about the US being "close to another Civil War" and I'm like, are you kidding me? A lot of people can't even be bothered to go and vote unless it's a Presidential Election, and even then you still have people who are too apathetic to actually go to the polls and cast their vote. Screaming and yelling on social media is about how far most people are going to go.
 
The Epstein files et al, depicting the world to be child fucking - and I use that word to not soften the reality of what they were doing - monsters, is not the tip of the iceberg. I don't believe they were just raping and fucking the children, I think they were exsanguinating them and eating them.

Releasing the heinous crime or child fucking takes everyone by shock and surprise - for the normies at least, and is so damaging, so evil, that people would believe that evil and look no further.

To back up the reasons behind why they would inject kids blood and eat them, have some studies:

Injecting young mouse blood, specifically plasma, into older mice has been shown to reverse signs of aging by rejuvenating tissues, improving cognitive function, and extending lifespan by 6-9%. This heterochronic parabiosis technique transfers youthful factors, such as GDF11, that improve brain, muscle, and liver function in aged mice.
Key Findings in "Young Blood" Research:
  • Rejuvenation Effects: Studies show that blood from young mice can reverse age-related cognitive decline, improve muscle repair, and boost overall physical performance in older counterparts.
  • Mechanism: Researchers have identified specific proteins, such as Growth Differentiation Factor 11 (GDF11), which are higher in young blood and help stimulate tissue growth, including blood vessels in the brain. Another potential factor is the protein CCL11, though it is associated with cognitive decline.
  • Methodology: While early studies used surgical joining (parabiosis) to share a circulatory system, later studies found that simple plasma injections from young mice are sufficient to produce beneficial effects.
  • Lifespan Extension: A 2023 study found that old mice receiving young blood had a 6-9% longer lifespan and displayed younger molecular markers in their tissues.
  • Limitations & Ethics: While promising, the effects in humans are not yet proven, and the research raises ethical questions about "treating" aging.
The research suggests that the benefits likely result from a combination of introducing young, restorative factors and potentially diluting the harmful components that accumulate in old blood.

And blood doping - currently rampant in sports,

Blood doping is a prohibited, high-risk method used by athletes to artificially enhance aerobic capacity, endurance, and performance by increasing red blood cell count. Techniques include transfusion (autologous or homologous), Erythropoietin (EPO) injections, or synthetic oxygen carriers, which boost oxygen delivery to muscles but increase risks of stroke, heart attack, and blood clots.
(highlighting not mine)

___________________________________________________________________

There's a social engineering technique, often used in boardrooms, Drs offices and anywhere where bad/good news needs to be delivered, where you deliver news so shocking, so bad, that it seems nothing can be worse, while hiding the real, worse information because that extra information would illicit no stronger response than the 'lesser' information.

100,000 people die in a tsunami. It's terrible, people cry, they're shocked.
150,000 people die in a tsunami. Same response,
200,000, 350,000, same response.
That's a crude, rough and ready example because I don't have the ability to explain this in text. I'm an orator, not a writer.

With that in mind. The social engineers get us to focus on very bad things; epstein is a pedophile, how terrible. Epstein eats kids - no, too crazy, not terrible or, oh my god how terrible. The same result as if he was a pedophile.

Likewise it is used to trick your senses. Something like AI for example. They will show you obviously generated AI films or movies and try to get it past you. Then the population goes "that's obviously AI!" and they feel good that they can spot AI - their minds are calibrated for it. However, the real, very convincing AI is so convincing that the population don't believe it can be AI because obviously they can spot AI:smug:

They do this with immigration as well. UK says we've added millions more migrants, this is what 'millions more migrants looks like'. Population believes they see 'millions more migrants' on TV and in the city, when the reality is tens of millions more. It's all about fucking with the calibration of perception.

Anyway, I reckon they're doing this to hide the fact of 'human sacrifice' where the blood of the youth is injected into the elite to keep them ticking as long as inhumanely possible.
 
With that in mind. The social engineers get us to focus on very bad things; epstein is a pedophile, how terrible. Epstein eats kids - no, too crazy, not terrible or, oh my god how terrible. The same result as if he was a pedophile.
Part of this, too, is the shocked-dog conditioning. We can't reach these people. No one (to my knowledge) on the Farms has the ability to even touch these people. At the end of the day, we're all still animals, and I don't think anyone can actually reach these monsters physically.
 
If you asked me a few years ago, just one or two, like we knew about 9/11 and elites are pedos (but independently pedophilic, not part of an intentional, world wide, organized plot.)

Now it is looking like the elite pedos have a sophisticated, interconnected pedo network that spans the whole globe.

Pretty sure voting is mostly fake, I'm beginning to suspect dead internet theory, fluoride in the water and other alex Jones ramblings are more true than not.
 
Pretty sure voting is mostly fake, I'm beginning to suspect dead internet theory, fluoride in the water and other alex Jones ramblings are more true than not
I have buddies that are big Alex Jones fans. I've never been one, he just doesn't appeal to me that much outside of the memes.

But there is a shocking number of things he ends up being proven right about. I think people tend to concentrate on the more outlandish things he says, and the fact that he's a bit of a cartoonish, performative guy. Then disregard most of the things he says because of that.

Also he is a huckster, or whatever the term would be. He pushes his supplements, and other stuff to fund himself. So people use that to discredit him. And look, I get why people don't like that he does that. But especially now days I don't blame him for trying to sell people whatever he can especially after the Sandy Hook lawsuit. They literally took that lawsuit, and said it's their chance to finally completely ruin his life. After he was already completely deplatformed (by basically every single platform, I want to say within the same week), and getting the same treatment everyone that was speaking a bit to loudly against the current agenda at the time got. At best that lawsuit was an example of how much the people in power hate what he's saying. There is no good reason they hit him with the amount of money they did other than to force him into poverty.
 
There's a social engineering technique, often used in boardrooms, Drs offices and anywhere where bad/good news needs to be delivered, where you deliver news so shocking, so bad, that it seems nothing can be worse, while hiding the real, worse information because that extra information would illicit no stronger response than the 'lesser' information.

100,000 people die in a tsunami. It's terrible, people cry, they're shocked.
150,000 people die in a tsunami. Same response,
200,000, 350,000, same response.
Didn't Stalin say something like "Kill one person, it's a tragedy. Kill 10,000 it's a statistic."?

o back up the reasons behind why they would inject kids blood and eat them, have some studies:


And blood doping - currently rampant in sports,

(highlighting not mine)
There is also PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) Therapy where they draw your blood, spin it in a centrifuge to separate the PRP, then inject it into the affected area (e.g., torn ACL, inflamed tendon) to make it heal faster.

I have buddies that are big Alex Jones fans. I've never been one, he just doesn't appeal to me that much outside of the memes.

But there is a shocking number of things he ends up being proven right about. I think people tend to concentrate on the more outlandish things he says, and the fact that he's a bit of a cartoonish, performative guy. Then disregard most of the things he says because of that.

Also he is a huckster, or whatever the term would be. He pushes his supplements, and other stuff to fund himself. So people use that to discredit him. And look, I get why people don't like that he does that. But especially now days I don't blame him for trying to sell people whatever he can especially after the Sandy Hook lawsuit. They literally took that lawsuit, and said it's their chance to finally completely ruin his life. After he was already completely deplatformed (by basically every single platform, I want to say within the same week), and getting the same treatment everyone that was speaking a bit to loudly against the current agenda at the time got. At best that lawsuit was an example of how much the people in power hate what he's saying. There is no good reason they hit him with the amount of money they did other than to force him into poverty.
I saw a meme the other day about Joe Rogan and he was quoted as saying that Alex Jones told him a decade ago about Epstein Island and he thought it was crazy, like it was the most outlandish thing he ever heard and that it sounded like the plot of a movie or something. But it turns out it was true, and makes you wonder what else Alex Jones was right about.

I know that even a broken clock can be right twice a day, but it does make you wonder. I used to be highly skeptical about most, if not all conspiracy theories but ever since the whole Covid thing, and the 2020 elections and all that followed, even the most outlandish tin-foil hat conspiracy theory is going to make me stop and think.
 
I know that even a broken clock can be right twice a day, but it does make you wonder. I used to be highly skeptical about most, if not all conspiracy theories but ever since the whole Covid thing, and the 2020 elections and all that followed, even the most outlandish tin-foil hat conspiracy theory is going to make me stop and think.
Like I said, I don't watch him myself (other than when my friends have him on when I'm visiting them or something) So I can't speak on how often he's completely correct. But like I was saying, he's portrayed as a lot crazier than he actually is if you watch what he says.

He does talk about some wild things. Some of the things he talks about aren't wild at all, but he's just an animated entertaining guy that puts a lot of energy into what he does.

People use that to completely dismiss what he says as if it's all tinfoil hat nonsense. Some of it is a bit tinfoil hat, I won't say it isn't. But there is a lot of it that really isn't. And he tends to get proven right about a lot of things over time.

There is one thing i remember my buddie showing me. It's a video alex jones did going to visit this place, I want to say it was bohemian grove. The elites all get together there, and they do these genuinely creepy rituals.

Alex jones managed to make it in there by rafting in on a river and videoing it (which is kind of crazy by itself, that he found out there is a river that goes in there, and decided fuck it I'm getting in a boat, and I'm gonna expose those damn globalists) and he did actually get video of it.
 
There is one thing i remember my buddie showing me. It's a video alex jones did going to visit this place, I want to say it was bohemian grove. The elites all get together there, and they do these genuinely creepy rituals.
Bohemian Grove, yep.
1770325321264.png
It used to be a bigger deal before the internet and smartphones and such. Now the location is also too well-known to be used for the sketchy stuff.
 
is not the tip of the iceberg. I don't believe they were just raping and fucking the children, I think they were exsanguinating them and eating them.
There is so much more to disclose, friend. 'Antarctic' bases (and the activities performed therein) will probably be as tough (or tougher) a pill to swallow for most. The harvesting, the experimentation, etc, does not stop at so-called 'elite' gatherings. Frankly, friends - there are things to be disclosed which will completely shatter the 'beautiful lie' we've had presented to us throughout our lives..in all ways.

Let's try a thought experiment, shall we? Just for fun:

Where are the boundaries to what you are willing to humor or believe as potentialities about your world? Or..perhaps phrased within context of the thread: what conspiracy is 'too far' for you? What are your limits?​
Got an idea of it? Great!​
Now - how would you feel if what was 'too far' had been proven to you (beyond all shadow of doubt) as true?​

I would suggest that for almost everyone reading this thread - at least one (probably several) of those boundaries are going to be broken completely open. Some of the lies due for getting peeled away will be world-shattering for many, but..it's part of the play. It needs to happen, because no one will be left behind stuck in falsities.

It's just a ride*, friends. All will, truly, be revealed.

*I do not necessarily agree with all of this man's thoughts, should it need to be said.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Pizzagate was itself a conspiracy to convince people the whole idea of an elite pedophile conspiracy was the idea of lunatics. Meanwhile the entire world actually IS ruled by a conspiracy of predatory sex fiends.

I don't recall enough, and it may have been from posts in this thread a while back but it seemed like Pizzagate originated as one thing.

Then suddenly all this crazy shit got added to it. Some guy went to shoot up a pizza shop that didn't have a basement and it forever got labelled as a wacky, out there, unhinged conspiracy theory.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole