What actual effect are they having on ICE operations? That's the only question that needs to be answered in a discussion about invoking the insurrection act. As far as I can tell, minimal hindrance to ICE operations. ICE is still getting around the city, ICE is still arresting illegals. Things are still going exactly as they need to be.
You've been successfully psyoped into hating art because a bunch of bad people took over an industry calling itself "art."
The thing about that fence, it's never neutral. A fence sitter is either afraid or apathetic. Always.
I dunno, I just walked to the grocery store for some shit and walked back and it was kinda civil. Little chilly.
More like conservative artists are blackballed from the industry because it's been ideologically captured by the left and anyone who doesn't toe the line gets ostracized
Two hundred libtards does not a revolution make. Literally all of this, and you guys will come back to this in six months and see how I’m right, is because Tim Walz would rather try to destroy the nation instead of going to prison on corruption charges. There’s a reason he was chosen to be VP.
It shouldn't be activated until Walz or Frey make an outright, official declaration that they are going to fight or impede ICE. So far they've just been talking tough and playing to the crowd. Unless I missed something, there is no executive order or legislative action to get agents of the state involved in the obstruction. The best Trump can show is offering sympathy or support to "protesters", I don't think they are even supporting for the illegals themselves at this point.
Man, I sure hope so (because we rounded up all the illegals and arrested all the malcontents)
The art industry is extremely kosher. Art does not exist in the bubble of this industry. Despite this you still see the anti-intellectual right openly discuss how much they hate all art and how AI has replaced the act of a human producing art. It's very spiritually Indian, like most things MAGA.
I honestly do wonder if the right can gain control of media like the left has for decades. The right has has a pretty tight grip on Internet culture for a fair bit I'd say (soyjaks being mainstream, terms like "chud" and "slop", even being used by leftists unironically, etc.) so it wouldn't be impossible. Especially considering that the left's ideas are all worn out and everything they make is even preachier than those awful Christian movies from the 2010's.
At what point is this not just considered a hostile city state in your nation in which the only sensible response is to destroy all surrounding infrastructure and kill anyone that steps out? The levels of oposition just make it pointless if you don't go full force.
Because conservatives enjoy seeing left wing artists screech and fearmonger over losing their livelihood. Not because they think art is "gay"
She's in third party risk management in an oversight function, which deals with keeping an eye on risks introduced by contracting with non-bank-controlled entities to perform any kind of function, for anything from managing a rewards program to providing catering for company events. So she's not making decisions around anything to do with customer accounts or credit decisions. ...but I wonder if her linkedin will soon show "open to work."
So, there are three types of retardation possible here:
Increase the sample size and you will absolutely see MAGA decide art is gay. These are the sort of people who could ingest AI produced garbage for the rest of their lives in every possible way because they sincerely couldn't tell the difference.
Looks like the 5th Reich is happening boyz. Remove the burger suit of shame....and attach the burger suit of triumph
“You’ve been successfully stopped into hating Harvard because a bunch of communists took over an institution calling itself “higher education.”” Do you see how fucking retarded that sounds? The last time the “art industry” was anything other than a vehicle for communist propaganda and sinecures for champagne socialists was a century ago.
What really happened is someone criticized some faggy thing you liked and it made you angry
>if someone has a gun, shoot it out of his hand to disarm him
This was after they saw Rittenhouse, wasn't it?
Is that true? I got into an argument today and a quick search got me this?