US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
He will lose on both. SCOTUS wouldn't have pushed back the rulings for this long if they weren't going to rule against him.


Exactly. The only thing we can do at that point is bend over and let the third world rape and pillage us. We have no more means of self-defesne.


Good luck getting the GOP to do anything that doesn't fuck us all over in the end because we live in Hell and all of existence is completely rigged against us.
1000010950.png
 
I wish my middleschool didn't skip the intricacies of the annexation of Hawaii, it'd have given me some sort of insight into the Greenland thing I assume. History nerds HELP.
Dole™ fruit company came in to invent Pineapple on pizza. The Hawaiian queen ate so much Hawaiian pizza she got fat and then the people rose up because she was so fat it was dangerous, forming the committee of safety, and decided to gracefully hand power over to the esteemed president of Dole Fruit Company who then agreed to become a territory of the US in order to keep the Hawaiian Pizzas flowing.

Atleast that's what my history book sponsored by Dolesays.
 
unlimited immigration from the third world and demographic replacement are the foundation of our GDP growth and the #1 priority of our entire elite political and economic classes.
Your half right. Our GDP is dependent on labor force multipliers, but that's doesn't have to be from a growing population or mass immigration. That's just what we relied on in the past. Families had 3 or more kids each back then usually to help around house or work the family business/farm. Later in life that's 3 productive people added to the labor force. Then families shrunk and even at 1 kid per family you're not growing the labor force, so someone thought it was a good idea to offset this by just importing more people. Those people were retarded.

You can look at it as a very early, imperfect, form of automation. The problem is that unlike your farm equipment and hand tools, these multiply without your input and have free will. Automation is a solution to most problems that America is faced with. While I want more families in America to have more kids, changing the culture will take time. In the immediate present we can replace most of these low level labor jobs with automation that keeps the labor costs roughly the same(high initial investment but low operating costs) and offers an alternative labor force multiplier to the economic/political class. As long as line go up, they don't really care how as we've seen them shift to whatever way the money blows.
 
Trump losing on tarrifs is next to inconceivable to me. For one, the idea that the scale of which he has taken his executive privilege being the problem is a non starter; executive privilege is the sole discretion on the executive. Second, if deemed unconstitutional, remuneration of tarrifs would be a fiscally insane but clearly necessary remedy.
 
Don Lemon on church members upset that he stormed their church: "They're entitled, white supremacists"

1.mp4
Yes Don. Please double down on the thing radicalizing the normies against the very concept of your movement. This can only work wonders for you. What did you have for breakfast this morning, by the way?
I find it somewhat interesting that the whole "immovable borders" idea started around the end of World War II. Like, that's it. The borders can't move anymore. Well, expect for Israel and USA. Israel gets infinite tries, and USA got the chance in the Iraq war, but that was super duper it. It's an interesting thing to ponder. It's not a natural state of events, obviously, from a historical perspective.
The left believes in "The end of history." I don't fully understand the concept, it's based on some foundational book they like, but supposedly the theory is something like that Leftism is so good, so perfect, so undeniably great that no other, better, political idea will ever be better so now it's just a matter of debating how to best implement it.

Part of this, supposedly, is the world map is done. It's over. It's a Civ9 game and we're all out of turns, score shall be tallied, and oh hey guess what, the globalists won.

This, supposedly, is why things like Trump wanting Greenland or Putin wanting parts of the Ukraine drive them so insane. That's not allowed. The game is over. The map is frozen forever. There shall be no new countries, nor changes to old countries, until the superstate is formed or whatever they plan in the future. They won, the rules say they won, and you aren't allowed to do anything about it because it's against the rules.
 
Trump losing on tarrifs is next to inconceivable to me. For one, the idea that the scale of which he has taken his executive privilege being the problem is a non starter; executive privilege is the sole discretion on the executive. Second, if deemed unconstitutional, remuneration of tarrifs would be a fiscally insane but clearly necessary remedy.
That's why I think he'll win on tarrifs. A ruling against him would essentially remove international trade from the authority of the executive which would upset our entire political system.
 
Come on. The choice is "pay Americans what the labor is worth with AI slaves" or "underpay jeet slaves with AI slaves." Which do you pick as a soulless silicon-bro Satanist?
If women think they feel unsafe now just wait until millions of young men from the most incely place on earth (India) are wandering the streets, angry and unemployed because AI took their jerbs.
 
He will lose on both. SCOTUS wouldn't have pushed back the rulings for this long if they weren't going to rule against him.


Exactly. The only thing we can do at that point is bend over and let the third world rape and pillage us. We have no more means of self-defesne.


Good luck getting the GOP to do anything that doesn't fuck us all over in the end because we live in Hell and all of existence is completely rigged against us.
Whitepilled.
 
I find it somewhat interesting that the whole "immovable borders" idea started around the end of World War II. Like, that's it. The borders can't move anymore.
The entire history of gay modern international politics is explained by the panic that a border might change. The UN's entire goal is to keep the map from changing, everything else is marketing.

It's probably the same reason we moved to proxy wars and cold wars: everyone's worried about nukes. Used to be that one country getting attacked was just a "wait and see who wins" deal, and everyone was perfectly happy to have a World War or two if enough alliances get attacked. Now it's not just a matter of how many peasants willingly die before the old ruler is kicked out of the palace; he might push a button and vaporize some cities on the way out. (Or the chemical weapon equivalent.)

You can kind of excuse the post-WW2 euros for being paranoid about it. The last map change lead to Hitler, and he wasn't even as bad as the Bolsheviks in terms of line re-drawing. The interwar map changes in the Middle East immediately went bad, and continue to cause problems today. They could reasonably blame 3 decades of destruction on map changes. Their descendants, though, are just neo-liberals who like stasis and hate decision making.

I think Trump spent his whole life watching the international order make bad deals and untenable alliances based on this fear. He hates the bad deals, and as head of the strongest military power in the world, he doesn't share the fear. The stuff with Greenland is just his real estate instincts kicking in, unburdened by eurocuck restraint or fear.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole