- Dołączono
- 28 Gru 2014
I've always vaguely suspected LFJ had something to do with it, although there's no real evidence.I dunno about that. Mainly because I am not sure how Russ got connected with DJF.
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
I've always vaguely suspected LFJ had something to do with it, although there's no real evidence.I dunno about that. Mainly because I am not sure how Russ got connected with DJF.
The whole thing was certainly part of a scheme to feed his show. I think that was pretty open and there were some (fundraising, mostly) reasons that Vic would want to do that even if he had his eyes open.One of the things that clinches it for me is he wanted Vic to come on his show to discuss the case. As a lawyer yourself, surely you would agree that is a monumentally fucktarded idea. There is a good reason why "due to active litigation, we/I can not discuss this matter" is boilerplate language in these situations.
Also, for a long time now I have believed that the referral to Ty was colored, at least in part, by a desire to have Ty as a frequent guest on his show (which is exactly what happened). If Vic hired some other attorney Nick wasn't chummy with, that would probably not have happened.
His whole meltdown over Vic was that Vic acted in accordance with his Christian beliefs and wasn't seeking vengeance. Nick wanted drama and fights. Vic just wanted to save his reputation and career. Nick threw a tantrum.The whole thing was certainly part of a scheme to feed his show. I think that was pretty open and there were some (fundraising, mostly) reasons that Vic would want to do that even if he had his eyes open.
Even at the time, I was fairly disgusted with Ty showing up on some gloatstream at the same time as his firm was filing absolutely mangled shit, late, and even before Sam Johnson (the only competent lawyer in the entire case) had discovered the affidavit deficiencies.Having Ty on frequently to set a media narrative could have been a good idea. But, like - only if it was done totally differently and didn't entirely distract Ty from his actual work he had to get done.
Which, again, is self-serving for a guy who has a monetized YouTube channel, and expects such a campaign to be waged on said channel. This is the same asshole that unironically said he wanted to be Rittenhouse's PR guy? Can you imagine?Nick has this opinion that he keeps pushing that public people need to be way more open about their litigation because it would help them in both the lawsuit and the PR battle.
Yes, and that's also self-serving, in a way, because a lot of Vic's enemies were also Nick's enemies.Nick basically wanted hem to come on and call Jamie and Monica hussies and that's obviously a bad idea.
I mean, there's that, but the other thing is you have to tread carefully in these sorts of situations, as a practical matter, so as to not supply ammunition to the opposing side. Vic was under a microscope.His whole meltdown over Vic was that Vic acted in accordance with his Christian beliefs and wasn't seeking vengeance.
Thanks for the tip. I'll do that.For anyone smart enough to stay home tonight, MLC will go live at 9 Eastern and there is sure to be ample shitting on Nick in any annual retrospective. (If you’re a Smiling Friends fan, comic/actor Mike Bocchetti will also be on.)
Somebody had to be cooking the food that Qayla gorged upon. Nick also hates fatties so he is trying to even the score since Chef Bull arrived.Nick is wearing the swinger ring again!
He hasn't worn it since April was out of the picture.
But here it is ... what kind of vacations/agreements have been made with Lady R? Are they a couple still?
Ty probably had good intentions but completely fucked it and never should have gone on stream with Nick. However I put most of the blame on Nick for recommending Vic a family friend instead of anyone in Texas who had experience with defamation cases.I still don't think there was anything wrong with handing the case to Ty. Referring cases to your friends is the done thing in the legal profession and by all appearances Ty should have been able to handle that case. He was both an experienced litigator and a local guy with local experience. His total failure to adjust under fire was flabbergasting at the time and indicates that his true experience probably lies in negotiation/client relations rather than courtroom stuff. Which then begs the question why he didn't ride his associates like normal?
Nick handled it poorly and his seethe sessions at Vic were unhinged, but from a legal perspective this is entirely Ty's L to hold and frankly if Nick wanted to have a public fight with anyone it should have been Ty for making him look like an asshole.
I get what you are saying, but I think the point here that's being made is that Nick cared less about whether Vic prevailed, and more about the $$$.
One of the things that clinches it for me is he wanted Vic to come on his show to discuss the case. As a lawyer yourself, surely you would agree that is a monumentally fucktarded idea. There is a good reason why "due to active litigation, we/I can not discuss this matter" is boilerplate language in these situations.
Also, for a long time now I have believed that the referral to Ty was colored, at least in part, by a desire to have Ty as a frequent guest on his show (which is exactly what happened). If Vic hired some other attorney Nick wasn't chummy with, that would probably not have happened.
Yes, lawyers refer to friends, but not all or most of them have monetized YouTube channels with their colleagues as guests.
That likely would have happened, but for the familial connection. Nick was very passive-agressive towards Ty whenever he would criticize him, and not the full-on raging asshole aggressive he normally is.
The whole thing was certainly part of a scheme to feed his show. I think that was pretty open and there were some (fundraising, mostly) reasons that Vic would want to do that even if he had his eyes open.
As far as the having him on the show goes - yeah generally commenting about your litigation is a bad idea. Nick has this opinion that he keeps pushing that public people need to be way more open about their litigation because it would help them in both the lawsuit and the PR battle. He's like sort of on to something, IMO but it wouldn't work the way he wants it to. Making measured statements that you and your attorney are prepared to live with later can be a good idea if you need to get out in front of something as a public person. nick basically wanted hem to come on and call Jamie and Monica hussies and that's obviously a bad idea.
Having Ty on frequently to set a media narrative could have been a good idea. But, like - only if it was done totally differently and didn't entirely distract Ty from his actual work he had to get done.
Minnesota needs to be nuked, especially the part Nick is in.But Minnesota is the kind of state that lets Somali immigrants fleece hard working tax payers for billions, and Trust Fund Lawyers to drive their kids around while they're out of their skull on cocaine.
Sunni wasn't old. Only abt 4 years. When he got it he had the cat picture (on the floor), but no swinger ring.“Our sweet old dog finally crossed the rainbow bridge”
That's what I was thinking. I remember when he talked about the new pup, around Rittenhouse. Even Buddha (Dank's GFs pug made it to like what 15?Sunni wasn't old. Only abt 4 years. When he got it he had the cat picture (on the floor), but no swinger ring.
And then he shall swing from it via his neck.(to make a rope swing of course)
Oh man, for some reason I thought he was old.Sunni wasn't old. Only abt 4 years. When he got it he had the cat picture (on the floor), but no swinger ring.
They got her February 25, 2022Sunni wasn't old. Only abt 4 years. When he got it he had the cat picture (on the floor), but no swinger ring.