Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
ECF 429
Screenshot 2025-12-30 151209.png
Screenshot 2025-12-30 151259.png

Screenshot 2025-12-30 151732.png
 

Załączniki

In Episode 429 of The Hardin Versus the Tardin, we find out that the treasure was never even hidden in the first place!

How much sneed will this cause?! Stay tuned until later today to find out!
 

I really can't say enough of how great Hardin's representation of Josh and the Farms has been. He makes multiple perfect killer points here, and if the judges would ever wake up from their eternal daze and fucking LOOK at the mound of filings Greee has been wasting everyone's time and Josh's money with they would surely agree with everything said. IF.
 
Succinct, yet meaty. A banger filing to be sure.

I particularly enjoy the garnish of neither confirming nor denying whether Greee should try filing it under seal. :story:
 
1767104228304.png

"Defendants note that neither we nor the judges are required to entertain this retarded plightsperging."
 
Meh. Except insofar as this particular tactic enrages Greer to the point of flailing and making inexcusable errors, I don't see it being helpful. Pissing Greer off so hard that he keeps fucking up is useful, but I can't see the judges appreciating this, assuming for funsies that they bother to even read it.
 
Meh. Except insofar as this particular tactic enrages Greer to the point of flailing and making inexcusable errors, I don't see it being helpful. Pissing Greer off so hard that he keeps fucking up is useful, but I can't see the judges appreciating this, assuming for funsies that they bother to even read it.
I look at a filing like this and think "this is pretty straightforward, there's no real way to argue against this. Door was clearly opened, no substantive objection, please grant this trivial technical motion".

Knowing that GreeePT will fling a frothing flailing angry reply, tilting at absolutely nothing, is both intellectually insulting and a hilarity I look forward to.

Edit:
I think trying to get the book into evidence is just going to come off as the big oil-slathered lawyer playing tricks on the poor unsophisticated Pro Se Person.
If this was being done in a hearing, it would be a straightforward one-and-done granting of Hardin's motion. Greer would squeak but he has nothing to offer in response.

It only feels like a fancy big city lawyer beating on a poor retard because the retard is allowed to email AI-generated responses to every single thing Hardin says, for free, and Hardin is required to respond to it.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I think trying to get the full book into evidence is just going to come off as the big oil-slathered lawyer playing tricks on the poor unsophisticated Pro Se Person.
It's like "You can't call witnesses" all over again, the judges clearly signaled their intention not to hold Greer to the letter of that at trial, because that just wouldn't be faaaaaair.
 
It's like "You can't call witnesses" all over again, the judges clearly signaled their intention not to hold Greer to the letter of that at trial, because that just wouldn't be faaaaaair.
Where did the Judges do that exactly? And even if they don't hold him to it, it allows Hardin to call Russ' family as witnesses (which may not provide much evidentiary value, but will certainly result in much seething and plighting).
 
Where did the Judges do that exactly?
I was thinking of the hearing transcript, but I was mistaken - that was about who can be a person with discoverable information, not who can be a trial witness. It's where the judges coined the term "hypertechnical flyspecking" for Hardin insisting on the letter of the law.
 
I think trying to get the full book into evidence is just going to come off as the big oil-slathered lawyer playing tricks on the poor unsophisticated Pro Se Person.
I don't think it would come off as anything since the Judge doesn't want to acknowledge the existence of this case.
But if we assume that the Court will actually do something, Hardins filing is straightforward. I can't imagine wanting more information (the whole book) being interpreted as some oil-slick lawyer trick.
 
Meh. Except insofar as this particular tactic enrages Greer to the point of flailing and making inexcusable errors, I don't see it being helpful. Pissing Greer off so hard that he keeps fucking up is useful, but I can't see the judges appreciating this, assuming for funsies that they bother to even read it.
I disagree. Attacking Greer on multiple fronts, however petty, seems to be very effective. Greer very quickly gets overwhelmed when the pace picks up, which gets him to start making huge mistakes. Like when he didn't respond to the motion to change venue. As long as Hardin can maintain that he's doing these things in good faith and keeps his filings brief, I see it being a good strategy.

Plus getting the entire book entered as an exhibit would be really beneficial, seeing how Greer characterizes Skordas, the Farms, himself, and his case in his "non-fiction" work. That could easily be used against him.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole