Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
1767023779738.png

What cases might those be, Mr. Greer? Can you cite some examples? Perhaps a bit of caselaw? No, you don't bother doing that anymore? D'awwwww.
 
"At the time relevant to Defendants’ motion, this Court had stayed discovery, so that Plaintiff
could serve the John Doe defendants."

Once again misstating the reason for Stay of Discovery. Never change, Greer. I promise that it's the Judge who entered the order wrong and you will be vindicated.
 
I went through and counted all the "weasel words", like willful and good faith.

21.

21 attempts at "poor Lil me, imma a poor se retard" in a page and a quarter of text.
 
Plaintiff is not an attorney, did not claim to be one

Hasn't he claimed on social media to be "like an attorney"? (I may actually be hallucinating that, so please be patient with me, I'm retarded)

If he has, that might be an interesting (read: amusing) line of questioning to direct toward him.
 
Hasn't he claimed on social media to be "like an attorney"? (I may actually be hallucinating that, so please be patient with me, I'm retarded)

If he has, that might be an interesting (read: amusing) line of questioning to direct toward him.
In his own book he portrays himself as basically as good as an attorney, that his fake lawyer friend(that was firebombed) was impressed by. He was only brought down by the judge being biased and a 6" HDMI cable.
 
Hasn't he claimed on social media to be "like an attorney"? (I may actually be hallucinating that, so please be patient with me, I'm retarded)

If he has, that might be an interesting (read: amusing) line of questioning to direct toward him.
It was something along the lines of "90% of an attorney" and his response misses the point regardless - Hardin was not saying Russtard should be held to the same standard as a lawyer, he was saying that Russle was more legally knowledgeable than the typical pro se party and the judges should rule accordingly.
 
Hasn't he claimed on social media to be "like an attorney"? (I may actually be hallucinating that, so please be patient with me, I'm retarded)

If he has, that might be an interesting (read: amusing) line of questioning to direct toward him.
I can't remember exactly how he worded it but he has more or less said that. For his purposes, being a paralegal is close enough to being one because it allows him to file frivolous lawsuits, waste people's time in court, try to punish anyone he feels has wronged him, sue for celebrity women's attention, various hooker-related stuff, etc.

That's what he wants to be able to do, and being a paralegal lets him do it. So he doesn't need to get an an attorney or become one himself. He's good enough for his purposes. He can do attorney things to the extent he feels he needs to. He's also mentioned that he doesn't use an actual attorney because he doesn't want to share his winnings.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
"At the time relevant to Defendants’ motion, this Court had stayed discovery, so that Plaintiff
could serve the John Doe defendants."

Once again misstating the reason for Stay of Discovery. Never change, Greer. I promise that it's the Judge who entered the order wrong and you will be vindicated.
1767025681186.png
He didn't just mistake it, he completely failed to read the actual judge's order at ECF 283:

1767025745747.png
"Paragraph 3" of the order being Greer's obligation to produce the Utah docs, which he never did despite repeated orders.
 
1767025953547.png
Dipshitforlips continues to conveniently ignore the aspect of 28 USC 1915 (e) (2) (A) which says the case SHALL be dismissed if AT ANY TIME the allegation of poverty is determined to be untrue. (Using bold means you're super SRS!) I hope Hardin responds with a one-page reply reiterating basically just that.
 
I was a little curious why Plaintiff thought a discovery stay allowed the discovery of the does. It's true that was the original motion. I think it's because he wasn't paying attention during the hearing since he was excited about the expansion of his brothel empire. But the transcript makes it pretty clear.
2025-12-29_08-32.png
As well as the written order, if Plaintiff could read.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole