Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Harvey Danger]

Hardin remaining frostily polite while distributing various little jabs about Greer's failures, of which there are many. I do hope we get to see these emails at some point.

I hope the 21 days notice of sanctions has gone out, or is being prepared. Hardin already laid most of the groundwork in his status report today.

 

[A_right_horrorshow]

What if at the end of all this, the fame Russ was desperate for ends up being "The Greer Act" being codified into law.
Either Pro Se litigants need to pass a basic IQ test before any filings will be considered or Summary execution of Vexatious litigants if their continued retardation shits up the courts more than three times in a year?

 

[RodgerDodger]

What if at the end of all this, the fame Russ was desperate for ends up being "The Greer Act" being codified into law.
Either Pro Se litigants need to pass a basic IQ test before any filings will be considered or Summary execution of Vexatious litigants if their continued retardation shits up the courts more than three times in a year?

That seems a little harsh. Maybe the Bailiff's get to beat them with sticks as a warning for first idiotic vexatious plightsperg lawsuit? Summary execution for further incidents?

 

[AnOminous]

In other words, if the case has maneuvered itself where the All Writs Act is applicable, is it a temptation to use it?

It would be nice if these judges found something that would allow them to demonstrate even the slightest trace of interest in their job that the taxpayers are paying them to do.

If Bowtie Bennett ever wakes up from his doze and reads this, the results will be....interesting.

Why does Bennett wear a bowtie?

To hold back the foreskin.

50 pages of nonsense and he couldn't even read the directions

Either it's just the usual Russtardation or he realized checking any of those boxes would constitute perjury.

 

[FatMan]

ECF #422

 

[A_right_horrorshow]

That seems a little harsh. Maybe the Bailiff's get to beat them with sticks as a warning for first idiotic vexatious plightsperg lawsuit? Summary execution for further incidents?

I think a case by case basis and level of Greetardation could be used to determine level of beating but "Third strike and lights out" has to be set in stone.

 

[FatMan]

No you fucking didn't.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Fucking literally admitting to venue shopping.
Don't like being ruled against, just open a new case!

The use of BOLD and UNDERLINING indicates that Shitlips is EXTRA MAD today!

Justice of the Peace Noreen Demonte denied your ex parte instantly Shitlips, Hardin's actions aren't even in the realm of consideration for harassment.

 

[Lapsus of the bepsus]

you mean... behavior that a state court judge just ruled explicitly does not constitute stalking?

 

[Harvey Danger]

ECF #422

A very restrained offering by GreeePT, but no less incoherent.



How exactly does that claim refute the assertion that you engaged in parallel litigation?



The All Writs Act also doesn't ban murder or treason. What's your point? Where's a response on the narrow issue of what the Act does address--state court interference in federal court cases--which you were clearly trying to pull?

I think AnOminous Hardin found a legal issue so obscure, AI isn't fully sure how to deal with it. Maybe that's the trick to getting Greer to dig a deeper hole: cite increasingly obscure legal concepts that GreeePT doesn't have enough source material to deal with.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

A very restrained offering by GreeePT, but no less incoherent.

Wyświetl załącznik 8297328

How exactly does that claim refute the assertion that you engaged in parallel litigation?

Wyświetl załącznik 8297332

Yeah the All Writs Act also doesn't ban murder or treason, what's your point? Where's a response on the narrow issue of what the Act does address--state court interference in federal court cases--which you were clearly trying to pull?

I think AnOminous Hardin found a legal issue so obscure, AI isn't fully sure how to deal with it.

Greer: Judges, I submit to you the evidence that I asked opposing counsel, who is not being an impartial neutral third party, to STOP being a lawyer. Please punish him for not stopping when I asked him to.

 

[obsdj]

ECF #422

ChatGreePT is back.

I'd love to know where our boy has gotten these notions that, when he sues someone, that defendant's attorney has no right to research and contact potential witnesses, or to look into and investigate the affairs of the person who brought the lawsuit in order to build an aggressive defense?

 

[Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa]

For someone who's constantly complaining about mischaracterization, Greee sure does like to characterize public records requests as stalking.

 

[DavidS877]

Power's back. Tard's back.

ECF 422 as images.

Spoiler: 4 pages

 

[obsdj]

Wyświetl załącznik 8297329
you mean... behavior that a state court judge just ruled explicitly does not constitute stalking?

When Hardin filed that status report this morning, he failed to mention that the protection order was already denied.

...Do we think Hardin omitted that on purpose, for strategery? Like, perhaps, waiting for Greer to file this bullshit that he just filed, only for the chance to reply to it with "ACKTUALLY, DENIIIIIIIED"?

Because that would be pretty funny.

 

[oh no its pipkun]

What if at the end of all this, the fame Russ was desperate for ends up being "The Greer Act" being codified into law.
Either Pro Se litigants need to pass a basic IQ test before any filings will be considered or Summary execution of Vexatious litigants if their continued retardation shits up the courts more than three times in a year?

there's a barrier to entry for pro se defendants in criminal cases but there aren't high stakes outcomes in a civil case. I'm not sure i want there to be a civol restriction given a possible need for myself in the future. Instead, the standard for courts to brand a retard a vexatious litigant should be lowered at least the districts should recognize each other's vexatious litigants instead of giving them a fresh go when the retards shop for courts

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Greetard TOLD Hardin to stop defending Null, but unfortunately for Greetard, Hardin doesn't have to listen to him.


Gree still doesn't get that if he lied about IFP -- and he confessed to lying about IFP already, it's just a matter of Hardin proving it -- the Tard Guard shield AUTOMATICALLY FAILS. The case is over and done with, except for the little part where Gree will have to pay Null's legal fees, which means Greetard will be paying Hardin for all this in the end, the second Hardin finds evidence that Greetard lied about being so poor he can't sue. And again, he already admitted that! On the record! Repeatedly!

Or maybe he does which is why he's throwing literally everything he has to try and get him to stop looking into things.

Fucking wanker.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Greer: Judges, I submit to you the evidence that I asked opposing counsel, who is not being an impartial neutral third party, to STOP being a lawyer. Please punish him for not stopping when I asked him to.

I want to know why Greer thinks this Court is somehow unaware of the motions, the sanctions, the repeated yelling at Hardin, the emails, any of the things his AI is repeating here. All the messages he's complaining about have been submitted on the record, multiple times, by both parties.

In order of completeness, Greer's complaints are best documented in:

1. This thread
2. The Utah court docket
3. Greer's head
4. Various rejected PO applications

The empty-headed #3 does not need to re-notify the official #2 what he is angry about.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

The empty-headed #3 does not need to re-notify the official #2 what he is angry about.

You would deny a man his right to EXPLAIN his PLIGHTS? My god man, that's almost like telling him he can't get him his penis sucked. Unthinkable.

 

[Mind Goblins]

Greer: Judges, I submit to you the evidence that I asked opposing counsel, who is not being an impartial neutral third party, to STOP being a lawyer. Please punish him for not stopping when I asked him to.

I just don't understand how he can be this deep in a case and not realize that the other guy doesn't have to give a shit about what he wants. He's opposing counsel for God's sake, his entire reason for being here is to point out the ways in which you are wrong and bad. Does Greer think the courts work like some kind of BDSM brothel? "I said the safe word, you have to stop now!" As has been said a few times in this thread already, the dildo of consequence rarely arrives lubed, and something tells me Greer isn't kinky enough to enjoy the one he's been building up for himself.