Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]

@Useful_Mistake

Big fan of the presumed error where you didn't finish highlighting "Court" because it seems like the order was denied so fast you cut yourself off mid sentence to give an update.


1765915545987.png
 
It appears stalker counsel will not be enjoying prison.

I'm not surprised, courts are going to be extremely leery of petitions for restraining orders filed by pro se litigants against their opponent's lawyer(s). That's even before service issues Russ probably ignored.
 
greer's next lawsuit may have to be against whatever AI he's been using to write his motions and come up with legal strategies.

"DEAR CHAT GPT. Is it a good idea to file a restraining order against this guy who has been harassing me through emails and contacting people about me even though I told him to stop?"

"I'm really sorry you're dealing with this. If someone is repeatedly harassing you despite clear boundaries, filing a restraining order can be an important step to protect yourself legally. You can file a restraining order (also called a protection order) without an attorney. Nevada has forms available on their website, and many local courthouses can assist with the hardship."

case closed!

"The person stalking me is the opposing counsel for a COPYRIGHT case I initiated and am currently losing"

"Ah I see, attempting to get a restraining order against opposing counsel is an interesting choice of legal strategy, especially if opposing counsel has clear and damning evidence of your deception to the court about IFP staus and creepy obsessive behaviour towards sex workers. Have you ever considered the likelihood that you're Greeetarded?"

"THATS DISCRIMINATION! SEE YOU IN COURT!"
 
It would be funny if Hardin filed a supplemental reply notifying the court that Russhole's PPO was denied by Clark County, just to rub it in Russ' saggy face.
IMO its funnier if he doesn't and leaves it hanging over the case until Russ has to explain his insanity himself. But I'm expecting some sort of filing from Russ, probably another unhinged motion.

*I am in no way sure which is legally best for the defense, or considered correct procedure - Hardin and null should obviously do what is best.
 
We still won’t hear from the judge for another two weeks.
More like a month. Two weeks from now is New Years then they need an extra week to allow for everyone to come back from vacation. Only then in the second week of January can the court reasonably return to schedule without denying sane and rational people time with their family.
EDIT:
In 2 of the other ones, there was a hearing, then stuff, then a denial.
In the 3rd previous one it looked like this one:
Denied
Then: Order Denying sent to Greer.
Presumably they don't close it until they stick the letter in the mail.
Wyświetl załącznik 8293662
Yep, looks like we're done here.
Wyświetl załącznik 8293661
Does that mean the department was able to serve Greer at a working address in person? Can Hardin request that address?
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Does that mean the department was able to serve Greer at a working address in person? Can Hardin request that address?
If he filed it by email, like some other attempts, they likely just served it back to him over email. If it got that far, Hardin would've needed to be physically served, as he had not consented to being served by email.
 
I presume whatever clerks handle restraining orders in Nevada are VERY familiar with Greee and just automatically denied it on that alone.
Clerks can't do that. Only the judge can.
People keep referring to this as an emergency order of protection, but where was it shown to be an emergency request?
The only reason in a case like this that justifies an ex parte order is some kind of emergency.
 
A question to this thread's members of the the tribe who specialize in in law. What are the likely and potential ramifications to the copyright(?) lawsuit after today's events? Can I expect an eventual verbal smackdown whenever the judges perform their biannual duties? Could it be more, or is it most likely they'll barely even acknowledge it?
 
The only reason in a case like this that justifies an ex parte order is some kind of emergency.
From what I can tell.(YMMV, HTH, HAND)
Nevada temporary protection orders(45 days) are ex parte if approved outright by the judge, no service of the complaint is required, but the order must be served once approved. The judge can also order a hearing or just deny them.
Extensions/permanent orders will require the defendant be served.
 
The last 2 weeks have been absolutely kino. Greetard felting himself, The Hardship felting him over and over, Banks with an absolutely emasculating declaration, and W.H. telling him to gtfo and stop dragging him into shit. Greetard is the new Tomlinson. Can’t wait for the next plightsperging filing from Russtard.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole