Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
These judges are complete fucking retards if they STILL overlook how Greer magically overlooks emails when advantageous (2 in 1 day is just too much, man!), but can unleash a flurry of panicked motions against every little thing Hardin does when he believes it's advantageous.

The recent flurry of filings are filled with so many lies, it's wild. Even things Hardin repeatedly specified in both emails to Greer and in his filings, Greer is now burying his head in the sand and saying "but he never identified this to me!" It's staggering how many mistakes he made and will continue to make.
 
Plaintiff respectfully submits 95 theses regarding the great evil of the Kiwi Farms, witness disclosure, and copyright infringement in general.
 
Stupid question. Do we remember where he admitted he moved to Vegas due to his AGT dreams and plans? Is that in the Freemantle case?
Oh shit oh shit oh shit, we have it in the record IN THIS CASE!
1765823836255.png

You can find it in ECF 219, Exhibit H, page 50, which is the "Appellant's Reply Brief" in the 10th Circuit case. It just so happens to be one of the very few "litigation history" files that Greer VOLUNTARILY emailed to Hardin.
1765824002565.png
 

Załączniki

Well since Russ is absolutely certain that Miss Banks has no relevant information to add, best she be deposed with any and all communications between The Brothel Prince be entered into public record. Just to be thorough.
 
Apparently it's 150% of the poverty guidelines
Wyświetl załącznik 8289922
So, $19,140
Apparently it factors in debts and monthly obligations as well. So it's not as simple as "you make more than x dollars per year so you're denied." This is why Greer is mentioning his vehicle financing and overlapping rent obligations. I think this is his least retarded defense.
 
I want Hardin to start disclosing random people as possible witnesses just to watch Greer sperg about them.

"Hello Greer, the guy at the U-Haul rental place might be witness. They might know about your address.
Yours, Hardin."

"Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion to Strike Defendant’s Improper Disclosure of a U-Haul Rental as a Witness


Plaintiff respectfully moves, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(i), 12(f), and 45(c)(3)(A)(iv), to strike Defendant’s improper “disclosure” of a U-Haul rental transaction as a purported witness, which disclosure is not only procedurally defective and barred while discovery remains closed, but also constitutes harassment insofar as it draws the Court’s attention to a deeply personal and embarrassing logistical episode involving said vehicle that has no conceivable nexus to copyright law, financial status, or any material issue before this Court, and which Plaintiff was compelled to undertake alone, late at night, and under circumstances he would not have chosen absent Defendant’s ongoing pattern of litigation abuse and voyeuristic interest in Plaintiff’s private moving-related activities."
 
"I made less than $40k"

Isn't the IFP threshold $21k?
the feds say a single individual making less than $15k is in poverty. so he's way above it. does the When and why russ decided to move to nevada instead of litigating his copyright case matter to the court? i suppose both things are voluntary actions. is AGT and luxor going to be invoked?
 
Its so easy to get lost in the weeds here considering how much bullshit Greer constantly files, but he's out of order here. He can't unilaterally demand the Defense not develop there own witness list. He can challenge whether or not the witnesses can be brought into the case during the discovery phase. He's basically demanding the court order the Defense to not gather their evidence. Which is not a thing you can do. He can challenge whether Natalie Banks gets in or not AFTER the defense has developed the reasons for bringing her in.

I feel like Hardin really needs to start bringing this up more. The shit Greer is filing right now is out of order and is wasting everyone's time and money.
 
Apparently it factors in debts and monthly obligations as well. So it's not as simple as "you make more than x dollars per year so you're denied." This is why Greer is mentioning his vehicle financing and overlapping rent obligations. I think this is his least retarded defense.
The problem is the defense is supposed to be able to argue against his claims, and it's not simply a matter of whether or not he met the criteria at that point in time, but if he then hid substantial changes in his financial situation towards the court in order to avoid paying the filing fee at a later time. If Greer is telling the truth, then this is his least retarded defense; if he's lying, then this is going to be devastating for him.
 
He's setting up the court with the book in the filing so that he can sue them for contributory infringement by making the ECFs public.

Hardin, you fool, it was a trap all along.
 
"I made less than $40k"

Isn't the IFP threshold $21k?
GreerSmug_50x60.png At the time plaintiff was certainly making less than $21k which is less than $40k. Unfortunately due to a bizarre goof plaintiff does not have those records anymore as they were deleted to make room for screenshots of Instagram sex workers. Which was a necessity to help escape poverty by opening the premiere brothel experience in Nevada.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole