Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Apteryx Owenii]

All this chimping over a witness disclosure. Not even a witness being called. Suffa, judge/magistrate.

Hardin should respond "plaintiff has yet again selectively edited his exhibits" and attach the entire book in his reply.

unironically, yes. I don't know why greer would kick open the door on this by spiraling his 'copyright' case into an argument over the content of his stupid book, but he did. So it would make sense to cite the other parts of the book that speak to his creepy, lunatic behavior (all of it, I imagine).

 

[DavidS877]

Yes Russ, that's EXACTLY HOW THIS WORKS. Well, if you hadn't waived your right to call any witnesses. Dumbass.


WHAT RULES?
Local? Federal? Utah State? I'll assume it's the rule of maritime law.
Good job randomly mixing the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with the Federal Rules of Ebidance, Russ.

 

[obsdj]

Too bad you stipulated that you had no witnesses and wouldn't call any other witnesses and if you try to call other witnesses, we can subpoena your dad and brother again, dipshit.

 

[FamicomGorby]

Hardin should respond "plaintiff has yet again selectively edited his exhibits" and attach the entire book in his reply.

At the very least Hardin could now mention the numerous and obviously fabricated events that Greer put forth as things that happened to him in the book. Like his fake lawyer friend being fire bombed or some hispanic guy doing a fake execution on Greer.

Or just bring up the times in the book where Greer writes about how he personally assaulted people for telling him his lawsuit is retarded.

 

[RodgerDodger]

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/doctrine_of_completeness

doctrine of completeness

Under Rule 106 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, when an incomplete writing or recorded statement is introduced in a trial by one party, the adverse party may require the introduction of any other parts or any other writing or recorded statement which ought, in fairness, to be considered contemporaneously with the writing or recorded statement originally introduced. This doctrine of completeness is to ensure the jury views the incomplete statement in its full context.

This additional evidence is called explanatory evidence, and its purpose is to qualify, explain or put the original piece of introduced evidence in context. Additionally, otherwise inadmissible evidence, such as hearsay, can be admissible under this rule if it is necessary to correct any confusion or wrongful impression created by the admission of the original evidence.

Forcing the Judge to read Greer's entire book? They might just hang you for that.

 

[obsdj]

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/doctrine_of_completeness

doctrine of completeness

Under Rule 106 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, when an incomplete writing or recorded statement is introduced in a trial by one party, the adverse party may require the introduction of any other parts or any other writing or recorded statement which ought, in fairness, to be considered contemporaneously with the writing or recorded statement originally introduced. This doctrine of completeness is to ensure the jury views the incomplete statement in its full context.

This additional evidence is called explanatory evidence, and its purpose is to qualify, explain or put the original piece of introduced evidence in context. Additionally, otherwise inadmissible evidence, such as hearsay, can be admissible under this rule if it is necessary to correct any confusion or wrongful impression created by the admission of the original evidence.

So will we be seeing Hardin assert this, not only for the book but for all this past year's worth of Greer's documented selective editing of emails?

 

[AnOminous]

are there any carve outs for "basic necessities" in a general sense? because he's making a distinction between destitute and basic needs that doesn't follow if destitute and poverty are to mean the same thing.

You don't have to be living in a van down by the river and it doesn't mean you can have absolutely no money for recreational activities, but if you have money for hookers you have money for filing fees.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Wyświetl załącznik 8289796

Too bad you stipulated that you had no witnesses and wouldn't call any other witnesses and if you try to call other witnesses, we can subpoena your dad and brother again, dipshit.
Wyświetl załącznik 8289800

I was thinking about this. I know little about the law, but can Greee really pull an undisclosed witness out of nowhere and then publish claims based on that person? Does this not raise the question of further sanctions?

 

[oh no its pipkun]

You don't have to be living in a van down by the river and it doesn't mean you can have absolutely no money for recreational activities, but if you have money for hookers you have money for filing fees.

I was thinking greer was being sly with the distinction.

 

[FamicomGorby]

Wyświetl załącznik 8289796

Too bad you stipulated that you had no witnesses and wouldn't call any other witnesses and if you try to call other witnesses, we can subpoena your dad and brother again, dipshit.
Wyświetl załącznik 8289800

That was before Greer knew you could call hookers as witnesses, now the sky is the limit with the number of Instagram thots he can message.

Greer will now subpeona every prostitute he has talked to so they can say how he cried to them about that dang old Kiwifarms and he was so stressed from the infringement that he needed his penis sucked. And while he has them on the line he'll ask if they wanna join his hypothetical brothel.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

You don't have to be living in a van down by the river and it doesn't mean you can have absolutely no money for recreational activities, but if you have money for hookers you have money for filing fees.

They are sucking on a pro bono basis.

You see, Mr. Greer is an up and coming brothel and coffee shop owner.

 

[The Un-Clit]

ECF 415
Wyświetl załącznik 8289711
Wyświetl załącznik 8289713

My hooker witness can beat up your hooker witness!

And she is the president of Nintendo, too!

 

[Useful_Mistake]

ECF 416

 

[DJ Grelle]

This is a contradiction. The book is intended to clear his name, so Russel implies that he is a public enough figure to warrant it. Ergo ' fair use' applies. Additionally, if the media distort his character, and Greee wrote the book to clear his name, then it is fair use to compare the two, no?

 

[GaryGray]

Is it appropriate to request the judges do something that the plaintiff has the power to do himself? If Greer thinks it is necessary and proper he can simply send a preservation order to Josh through Hardin himself.

 

[DavidS877]

It's 10AM and I've run out of witty stuff to say.
Have some 416 as images.

Spoiler: Only 5 pages...

 

[The Stranger]

This case is going super-critical, filings are being filed faster than the Judge can read them

 

[obsdj]

That was before Greer knew you could call hookers as witnesses, now the sky is the limit with the number of Instagram thots he can message.

Greer will now subpeona every prostitute he has talked to so they can say how he cried to them about that dang old Kiwifarms and he was so stressed from the infringement that he needed his penis sucked. And while he has them on the line he'll ask if they wanna join his hypothetical brothel.

And when he does, he voids the above-noted stipulation, and we get to call his dad and brother again. Boy howdy discovery is fun.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

What does this even mean, exactly?


Prison arc! Yeah, let's go!

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

If his entire book ends up in the public domain (not used as a legal term here) via legal briefs, does that negate the copyright infringement claims, because now literally everyone can read and distribute the text?

And yet again Russ seems to slept through the class in paralegal school that says that lawsuits are adverserial. Witnesses are allowed to be "bias" because that's the nature of conflict! The court system was created so that people could settle their feuds without resorting to combat or whatever.

It's telling that most of his filing talks about ~character slap fights~ and not about Hardin's claim of fair use. He AND the AI knows he doesn't have a leg to stand on there.

Edit: ohffs. That declaration is superfluous and unnecessary. Yet again, Russ is just copying what Hardin is doing without understanding why he's doing it.