Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Useful_Mistake]

I appreciate how he changed his font for this one

 

[obsdj]

ECF 415

Did he literally just fucking upload HALF OF HIS BOOK into the record?

 

[Catboy Ranch Dressing]

ECF 415
Wyświetl załącznik 8289711
Wyświetl załącznik 8289713

Did Greer just include his book as an exhibit?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Did he literally just fucking upload HALF OF HIS BOOK into the record?

Seems like that, yeah.

 

[DavidS877]

The reply to the response to the motion to reply to respond to move to strike Russell Greer out a window.

415 Images.
It appears my PDF to Image tool is broken as it came up with 38 pages...

Spoiler: Thirty eight fucking pages

This filing was not checked for porn.

 

[ScooterL]

ECF 415

WTF Exhibit B.

What is he trying to do? Have the court pat him on the head and tell him his crackpot legal theory on which he based the Swift case is actually genius?

 

[oh no its pipkun]

the work was written to clear Plaintiff’s name

the criticism of the work on this site thinks it does the opposite. which is fair use. I know we talked about the book being free on amazon and all the stuff before, but.....

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

It's actually much dumber than that. Moving to Vegas was all part of his masterplan, along with spending another several grand on hiring musicians to do the actual performing, to audition for AGT so he could woo Heidi Klum with a song he wrote for her.

Fucking Goddamned hell in a bitch shitting basket. I completely forgot about the America's Got Talent gambit. See, judge? This is how little Greer boi, which rhymes with Queer boi, thinks of and respects you. Enjoy non-compliance, judicial child. I hope Bennett and whatever Grima Wormtongue clerk he has whispering into his ear are pantsed in the court locker room and given pink bellies by the fattest bailiffs in the county.

 

[Catboy Ranch Dressing]

Did he literally just fucking upload HALF OF HIS BOOK into the record?

Hardin should respond "plaintiff has yet again selectively edited his exhibits" and attach the entire book in his reply.

 

[obsdj]

Do my eyes deceive me, or is this AIslop filing completely bereft of any caselaw citations whatsoever?

And again, zero caselaw is cited in this filing. What happened?

 

[oh no its pipkun]

And again, zero caselaw is cited in this filing. What happened?

he's probably scared to use the caselaw citations because someone caught the watermark.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Ultimate "no u":


Are you saying that I am dangerous? Then I think you are dangerous, stalker child!

 

[RodgerDodger]

Oh Russ, you not so beautiful bastard. You didn't disappoint, outside not being able to file a single damn thing on time.
Wyświetl załącznik 8289601
"Ya honah, see I had deez billz n sheeeeeeeeeeeit. Ain't no judge gonna sit dere n say "Gimpa got billz n sheeeeeeeeeit so he ain't gone pay fees? Guilty motha fucka!" cuz if I do dat then I'ma do shit that's illegal n sheeeeeeeeeeeeit! You wan me break da law, ya honah? I didn't think so, bitch!"

Like...the dumb fucking mouth breather admits by his own account that he had money but he wanted to say he had no money so he could pay for a fucking U-haul so he could be, presumably, closer to paid sex. Why? Why in the ever loving hell would you admit that as some sort of excuse? Does the fact that I can turn my head and sip soup blind me to the answer?

and directly below that
Wyświetl załącznik 8289618
"In fact it was YOUR fault, stupid court, for not telling me I had to be poor forever!"

Oh Russ you Magnificent Bastard with this filing you just insured that the Judge has to Crack open ECF#1 to allow the Defendants to respond to your claims today. You would have been tactically better off not responding. Because by doing so you fuck yourself. Please do continue.

Once again you are admitting you used IFP not based on your actual income. But as a bridge loan because the statute of limitations was up and you had too many elective expenses.

 

[Kosher Dill]

Motion for Plaintiff to proceed under a pseudonym

 

[obsdj]

This filing was not checked for porn.

I can happily confirm there are no stacked thots under the ludicrous images included in the filing FROM HIS FUCKING BOOK, holy shit whenever you think Greer can't get any crazier, he says "Hold my spit cup."

 

[SargonF00t]

ECF 415
Wyświetl załącznik 8289711
Wyświetl załącznik 8289713

It's over Kiwi Bro's, Exhibit B of this filing has surely handed Russell an unassailable victory against the odds.

 

[oh no its pipkun]

Hardin should respond "plaintiff has yet again selectively edited his exhibits" and attach the entire book in his reply.

is chapter 10 actually about his lolsuit?

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

I can happily confirm there are no stacked thots

Nigga you gay.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Is ECF 415 some sort of tard Hail Mary where he retardedly believes that he can cause a mistrial so he can just do the whole thing over again? This is so insane that I can't help but feel like I'm missing something.

WHY THE FUCK IS HIS BOOK IN COMIC SANS!?!?

 

[Null]

Hardin should respond "plaintiff has yet again selectively edited his exhibits" and attach the entire book in his reply.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/doctrine_of_completeness

doctrine of completeness

Under Rule 106 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, when an incomplete writing or recorded statement is introduced in a trial by one party, the adverse party may require the introduction of any other parts or any other writing or recorded statement which ought, in fairness, to be considered contemporaneously with the writing or recorded statement originally introduced. This doctrine of completeness is to ensure the jury views the incomplete statement in its full context.

This additional evidence is called explanatory evidence, and its purpose is to qualify, explain or put the original piece of introduced evidence in context. Additionally, otherwise inadmissible evidence, such as hearsay, can be admissible under this rule if it is necessary to correct any confusion or wrongful impression created by the admission of the original evidence.