💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Nick: "(...) Shut up! You're a nobody online like everybody else, but you're even more of a nobody. That's legal advice, baby. Take it in vain."

"I am giving 100% legal advice for all my clients, and this is protected by attorney-client privilege. And the Minnesota Board of Law Examiners, they actually approved and demanded that I say this specifically. That's what happened. (...) They've got this conundrum right now, some dork is telling them that I'm holding myself out as a lawyer representing clients, because I say, hey, I'm Nick Rekieta of Rekieta Law, a small law firm in central Minnesota. Those are all true statements, right? Nick Rekieta of Rekieta Law. And I am a lawyer. I'm not currently licensed to practice in Minnesota because my license is suspended, but I am a licensed attorney. I am licensed, but my license is suspended. I am not disbarred. My license is not gone or obliterated in any way. It's just on suspension. So they're telling me that they have a problem with me saying I'm a lawyer. I'm holding myself out as a lawyer. It's like, well, that's really interesting, because if I'm not a lawyer, if I'm not a lawyer, then the model rules of professional or Minnesota rules of professional conduct for lawyers cannot apply to me. It's like, if I'm not a lawyer, you can't hold me responsible under the rules. And if I am a lawyer, then I'm telling the truth. So if I'm bound by your rules, then I am a lawyer. I do not represent myself as licensed, but this is a weird artifact of how they do it. You can't apply the rules of professional conduct to non-lawyers. It doesn't work."
Sovcit levels of argument from Rekieta here.
 
Someone's has taken a frivolous HRO against me. Until the matter is not resolved, we're under sequestration order."

Nick: "I'm confident in our position. I think we'll ultimately emerge victorious in this but it's up to the court, and we're on the court schedule."
LLLL: "And what is the court schedule, when's the next hearing?"
Nick: "There's not currently one scheduled, which is lovely. There was A deadline, which I can't discuss that's just passed now and we're waiting on the court to inform when the next thing will be.
It's such a frivolous HRO that it's been in force for ~6 months (I think I remember it beginning in June but I may be wrong) and the court doesn't seem in a rush to throw it out or even tell Nick/Melton what is going on. Sounds frivolous to me.
 
SO: Nick started streaming 16 hours ago.
1765109542631.png

He needed to switch to the Lego stream, but he had a pause of 1 hour because of "tech problems"

And the ongoing stream is 9 hours long:
1765109652784.png

Local time for parents of 5:
1765109788851.png

ETA: finished 9:28:01


1765110505124.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Nick got trolled on Matt and Ian again, he said its not a "legitimate question" of which the entire panel was confused why he wouldn't answer it.
 
I agree—but mostly because it's been almost nine fucking hours, and he still hasn't been able to complete a set with only 1,508 pieces! That's not a lot!
How is he still working on it?
I have gone to sleep and woken up in that timeframe, Jesus Christ. If I were a sleepwalker I could have done it faster with my consciousness disengaged.
 
It's such a frivolous HRO that it's been in force for ~6 months (I think I remember it beginning in June but I may be wrong) and the court doesn't seem in a rush to throw it out or even tell Nick/Melton what is going on. Sounds frivolous to me.
That is the thing that doesn’t make sense to me. If it is so damn frivolous, why would a judge allow it to drag on this long? But maybe it is normal and happens some times.
 
🚨HRO: he can't talk about it, he has a gag order:

Nick "We're still in our hearing, which our hearing is not concluded - I'm under a sequestration order about it's details. My HRO. Someone's has taken a frivolous HRO against me. Until the matter is not resolved, we're under sequestration order."

Nick: "I'm confident in our position. I think we'll ultimately emerge victorious in this but it's up to the court, and we're on the court schedule."
LLLL: "And what is the court schedule, when's the next hearing?"
Nick: "There's not currently one scheduled, which is lovely. There was A deadline, which I can't discuss that's just passed now and we're waiting on the court to inform when the next thing will be.
 
The judge could pull the HROs tomorrow and it would still be another win for the Toe. Nick and Melton have been unable to shake the restrictions for the better part of a year. Aaron has been domming them the whole time.
 
Sovcit levels of argument from Rekieta here.
He definitely needs to push this line of reasoning.

Nick: "If I'm not a lawyer, I'm not bound by your rules."
Bar: "Correct. In that case we move from professional discipline to felony. It's against the law to hold yourself out as eligible to practice law if you are not. We will also disqualify you from ever returning to the bar. Aren't you on probation?"
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole