The Gay Pedophile at the Gates

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
When I ran 9chan a similar pedophile abuse pattern happened and he just spent hours a day trying to defeat it.
Reading this again, and I just can't help but wonder whether or not all of the rumors and talk about "federal agents taking down altchans with overwhelming CP spam that immediately gets reported" might have just been leto the entire time
 
Why is it that guys get this good at attack strategies then waste it on spamming CP to random forums instead of working with a three letter agency and getting paid giant piles of money to do basically the same thing?
Because it's probably the TLAs or some other globohomo entity literally paying him to do all this shit. He may have already been caught for CP and now they're using him. When someone is constantly spamming CP and his identity is known and the law does absolutely nothing, what does that say? Who's doing this? This pedophile? Or is it someone else?

Remember when Matthew Prince boasted about his freeze peach support and within a couple days, suddenly declared us an "imminent threat to human life" based on the false flag post of this specific pedophile?

Who do you think was giving Matthew Prince his marching orders?
 
>gay pedophile
So he's just the average gay person.
G5DhEtCbIAU0iwB.jpg
 
I'm not that well-versed in cyber security. I am just tossing out bird thoughts. Could a hidden account reputation system with a registration threshold do anything?

The thought is, once the threshold is reached within a certain time all accounts registered within said time frame get automatically a low reputation and accounts with suspicious behavior lower their reputation. Accounts with a low enough reputation get banned/deleted automatically. The score of reputation needed for this to occur changes depending on how new/trusted the account is.
What would not posting at all do to my reputation
 
What does one do when they view undesired CP? It's my understanding that even looking at it for a split second doesn't matter, because the image is downloaded to your computer's cache. And also my understanding that it's not enough to say you never wanted to see it, that you're disgusted by it, etc. You have to report it immediately and have the feds forensically examine your computer. How much of this is true?
 
What does one do when they view undesired CP? It's my understanding that even looking at it for a split second doesn't matter, because the image is downloaded to your computer's cache. And also my understanding that it's not enough to say you never wanted to see it, that you're disgusted by it, etc. You have to report it immediately and have the feds forensically examine your computer. How much of this is true?
Depends, considering the farms are registered in the US and not offshore, there could be a potential chance of it being looked into. But considering the biggest pedo sites on the darkwebs host the actual csam stuff on public file hosters like solidfiles, pixeldrain or bayfiles and they lay dorment there for years and even than users dont get in trouble if someone reports them to the hoster, i doubt something would really come from it, unless the feds seize the site and even then, i very much doubt theyd go after the farms when there are bigger fish in the pond.
 
He may have already been caught for CP and now they're using him. When someone is constantly spamming CP and his identity is known and the law does absolutely nothing, what does that say? Who's doing this? This pedophile? Or is it someone else?
Not here to cause an argument but I would think law enforcement would not be allowed to distribute CP? keep the website up, preserve and honeypot everyone but the actual act of going around spreading it more I'd be amazed if that's somehow legal to put it out there or spam it.
 
Not here to cause an argument but I would think law enforcement would not be allowed to distribute CP? keep the website up, preserve and honeypot everyone but the actual act of going around spreading it more I'd be amazed if that's somehow legal to put it out there or spam it.

Cmon man. We all know the feds dont play by the rules. Legal doesnt matter when you are the law and have all the power of the blackmail material you have on every power that might control you.

If they wanna set people up they will and then reconstruct a version that differs for court. They'll lie about what tech they have not available to the public. They'll lie about who is an asset and hang them out to dry.

They have been caught doing all these things. Hiring a pedo to spam CP and paying him by not yet arresting him is tame compared to the shit they've been caught doing.
 
law enforcement would not be allowed to distribute CP? keep the website up, preserve and honeypot everyone but the actual act of going around spreading it more I'd be amazed if that's somehow legal to put it out there or spam it.
It obviously isn't "legal" neither for the LEO agency that funded on the top nor for the contractors funded at the bottom. Its about plausible deniability, the modus operandi by intelligence agencies meddling in "grey areas" to fulfill their political lords interests, as the ability to lower the possible reputational risk should it become widely known, by claiming to not have known what the hand did.

It worked for the German industrials and paper pushers, that claimed they did not know about the slave camps in the East, yet massively profited during the war as after the war.
 
Cmon man. We all know the feds dont play by the rules. Legal doesnt matter when you are the law and have all the power of the blackmail material you have on every power that might control you.

If they wanna set people up they will and then reconstruct a version that differs for court. They'll lie about what tech they have not available to the public. They'll lie about who is an asset and hang them out to dry.

They have been caught doing all these things. Hiring a pedo to spam CP and paying him by not yet arresting him is tame compared to the shit they've been caught doing.
Which feds, and which nation's feds?

I don't see the DHS doing this shit, nor do I see USPS doing this. Maybe the IRS.

Here, I'll give a list, pick which one is doing the "Hey, let's post images of naked children getting raped, sodimized, burned, killed, beheaded on the internet to do our jobs"

 
Which feds, and which nation's feds?

I don't see the DHS doing this shit, nor do I see USPS doing this. Maybe the IRS.

Here, I'll give a list, pick which one is doing the "Hey, let's post images of naked children getting raped, sodimized, burned, killed, beheaded on the internet to do our jobs"

In this case the USA and I thought it was clear enough I was referring to the FBI mostly and their entanglements at times with other interior facing intelligence and other spooks. Ofc I don't mean the USPS and in this case I don't mean the VA either. The ATF and DEA are the FBIs butt buddies but I wouldn't assume that *this time*. The DIA and CIA however are sus AF and always will be.

The fact I'm explaining this to you makes me wonder if youre retarded or a glowie your fucking self. I'll assume retarded.
 
Hypothetically speaking, what's stopping from a brave American citizen from arresting this guy and handing him to the cops? We know what this guy looks like, where he lives, and how he acts. Considering the feds aren't going to do anything about this guy, maybe some random 4channer could take on the challenge?
You want to assault and kidnap a guy based on third hand and extremely questionable dox from the Sharty?

You think this is one of your Marvel capshit movies or something?
 
You want to assault and kidnap a guy based on third hand and extremely questionable dox from the Sharty?
Considering all solutions here and I have not seen this one popped up and decided to submit it just to see thoughts on this.
I am asking if it had ever been attempted and if its possible, not a call to action.
 
Which feds, and which nation's feds?

I don't see the DHS doing this shit, nor do I see USPS doing this. Maybe the IRS.

Here, I'll give a list, pick which one is doing the "Hey, let's post images of naked children getting raped, sodimized, burned, killed, beheaded on the internet to do our jobs"



As for the particular mechanics of allowing/forcing a criminal to continue participating in criminal activity for the benefit of the feds... that's literally what an informant/asset is. The colloquial depictions would have you believe it's limited to gathering intel, but a quick search on the term "counterinsurgency" will show otherwise.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Considering all solutions here and I have not seen this one popped up and decided to submit it just to see thoughts on this.
I am asking if it had ever been attempted and if its possible, not a call to action.
No you can't just citizen's arrest someone for a crime you didn't personally witness. Even in Texas. Feel free to use a search engine to find out more.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole