💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
It's amazing how cringy all the personae that Nick presents are. The only "good" one was the trad dad fake personality. At least that appealed to people. But he can't even put that one back on after all the vile criminal shit he's done and all the blasphemy he's uttered.

Then the major other one is his current cocaine villain persona, where he wears sunglasses inside (what the fuck kind of cringelord does that) in front of a picture of the Joker, like he's a 12 year old emo kid. Meanwhile, we see from his DMs that he's a pathetic, clinging cuck who begs for attention from any female who doesn't just block him.

He's now basically Russell Greer, a weird sex pest who is only interesting to people interested in cringelords.
Ironically some of his oldest livestreams focused on Russell Greer.
 
Just from what Ralph said this is barely the tip of the iceberg in terms of what Rekieta has shared with him, IceDancer, and probably a ton of other people. He lives with the constant sword of Damocles that any of it could come out at any time. He's so fucking stupid.

Him making this random egirl his close confidant also goes to show he doesn't have a single real life friend left to talk to.
 
Him making this random egirl his close confidant also goes to show he doesn't have a single real life friend left to talk to.
Nobody with any reputation to preserve would have anything to do with this pathetic, ridiculous cuck because just being associated with this subhuman would ruin your reputation.
 
If Ralph is correct in his statement that all his leaks are from around June 2025. That means:
  1. He's still bragging about believing he is a sexy mysterious bad boy
  2. He is still bragging about getting desperate wine mom pussy
  3. He is still heartbroken over April, nearly six months after she moved out
  4. He is still huffing whippets, months after his probation conditions
Nothing changes with Nick. Any conditions, whether personal, familial or legal. They are all just hinderances in his eyes.
If Kayla left him and his probation was dropped tomorrow, he'd be drunk, high and Rugiet'ed by Wednesday.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I hate this man. I hate how he screwed over Vic Mignogna, I hate how he grifted so much money off of people's situations like Rittenhouse/Depp then wasted it, I hate how much of a selfish degenerate man he is, I hate how he neglected his kids/family and I hate how he dodges any accountability for his actions like a woman.

and despite all that I just said I feel as though I don't hate him enough.
Yeah, it's autistic as shit to feel genuine "hatred" for any online personality, but him actively neglecting his kids because he felt at 40+ years old he was entitled to play "rockstar" legit gets me MATI.
 
Divorcing her is a narcissistic injury that he was unable to maintain a relationship.
Naturally, this is antithetical to Rekieta. He's rather keep her as a miserable house slave than a free woman.

Tbh I could see him happily chucking Kayla, believing everyone would just see him as a fuckin' Chad if he "upgraded" to April and could show her off everywhere.

I wouldn't be surprised if Nick wanted Kayla to be the one to initiate divorce proceedings, so a) he could forever claim moral superiority over her and pretend to be a martyr, and b) perhaps there was some financial penalty involved. He and April (or "April") seemed to be doing everything in their power to goad her into it at one point.

For whatever reason Kayla seems to have her claws dug in for dear life, I'm kind of assuming that they both want control of assets like the house and whatever provisions of the Trust there are for the children and the one who has primary custody etc. Nick's likely already been siphoning off it for years (e.g. the $3,000 "snack budget" for the starving children).

Also, c'mon Nick, now the only way to get back at Ralph and your whore of a wife is to try and sleep with Daggerpussy!
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Quite frankly, IDGAF who divorces who. That is, who initiates it. That marriage is a joke. Those kids are unsafe. This is untenable.

I don't think either of them could be a functional parent alone. The grandparents should have stepped in after the original arrests. But instead they went into family court and backed up Nick. The grandparents attitude really makes me wonder if they could function as parents either.

If they were good grandparents, they would have already moved there full time to watch over the house and pulled the financial lease on Nick as tight as they could. But as far as I can tell, they don't care much. They seem to love the money and the life it grants them in places like florida. The more I see of them, the more I start to understand why Nick is like he is in some ways.
 
b) perhaps there were some financial penalty otherwise. He and April (or "April") seemed to be doing everything in their power to goad her into it at one point.
There's a general assertion that Rekieta ITT would suffer a penalty in his trust fund if he initiated divorce proceedings. Has that actually been established or is it an assumption of their "Christian" lifestyle?
If they were good grandparents, they would have already moved there full time to watch over the house and pulled the financial lease on Nick as tight as they could
Being devil's advocate, try to imagine doing that, and then imagine having such a whiny, litigious, 'bating faggot of a son. They probably decided to be swept away by the river years ago.
 
Kayla's parents are obviously more fit. They actually appear human, rather than just being bizarre reptile aliens. Nick is like a dumber version of Dennis Reynolds.
Nick has no business being under the same roof with children, or being with them anywhere unless supervised by trusted third parties.
 
There's a general assertion that Rekieta ITT would suffer a penalty in his trust fund if he initiated divorce proceedings. Has that actually been established or is it an assumption of their "Christian" lifestyle?

Nothing established - I think the closest thing was when Nick went on a bitter tirade once about pre-nups (he wished he had one, I think?). I'm sure someone remembers.

Nick has no business being under the same roof with children, or being with them anywhere unless supervised by trusted third parties.

I'm concerned about the time Kayla was away in Mexico, I hope it's when the kids were at Bible Camp or at the grandparents, because I cannot imagine 5 kids alone with Nick.

Maybe the eldest babysat the four others and his dad.
 
There's a general assertion that Rekieta ITT would suffer a penalty in his trust fund if he initiated divorce proceedings. Has that actually been established or is it an assumption of their "Christian" lifestyle?
All depends on what's in the private treaty him and his family signed. It's an income, so of course it would be divided, also he would have the expectation to keep Kayla and their poor children at the same quality of life they are accustomed to, if the trust had an unbroken family as part of the requirements for getting a timed pay out, he could be royally f**ked.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole