📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Agreed. But mumsnet is all women and we're really pretty harshly socialized to placate (especially men) and keep the peace at the cost of our own comfort and mental health.

It takes a lot of bravery for a woman to stand in front of a man and say no. So I'm not surprised at the advice she's getting. I'd absolutely talk to the school, but probably over email where it feels safer and I can collect my thoughts better.
I bite my tongue about troons in public and would probably advise my hypothetical daughter to as well, for her own safety.

The troon hivemind is violent - If one of "DD's" classmates took offense to the "transphobia" they could easily decide to dox her via tiktok or whatever, opening DD up to rape threats and worse from the hive. Teens aren't mentally equipped to handle the filth and violence that would get hurled at DD if her "transphobia" was publicized. I'm kind of surprised she's not already getting bullied at school by handmaidens.

This isn't a fight that's safe for females to fight on an individual level, especially a minor. It's disgusting that she's forced to indulge Teacher Troon's fetish or face potentially violent and threatening repercussions, but that's just how it is these days. One of my many, many reasons for not wanting to have children.
 
Non binary Pooner destroys her quite lovely singing voice with testosterone Kermit and seems to enjoy it or is coping. Comments praising it, obviously.
She sure is coping, she sounds like crap now. Croaky and froggy and just a very unpleasant sound. No one wants to listen to this, it's uncanny. And bonus full face of cystic acne one of the last phases she shows.

There are always too many sopranos looking join both amateur and professional choirs, so I appreciate dumb pooners taking themselves out of the running completely.
 
Attractive, white, talented, wealthy girl, every privilege stat MAXXED and still chooses to ruin all of these things, while actively getting encouraged by others to mutilate herself.
Completely normal and valid.
Some people just come out the womb mentally ill.

IDK though maybe the family dynamic is fucked and that's why she jumped off the deep end. Having shit parents seems to be a trend with trannies because it's almost like sometimes that's part of why they want a new identity.
 

None of this shit is properly formattet. Enjoy!​

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/05/bbc-trans-coverage




BBC trans coverage ‘censored’ by its own reporters​

Corporation’s LGBT desk ‘keeps other perspectives off air’, leaked internal dossier claims

The BBC’s trans coverage is subject to “effective censorship” by specialist LGBT reporters who refuse to cover gender-critical stories, one of the broadcaster’s own advisers has warned.
BBC staff have expressed concerns that the LGBT desk – which is shared by all the corporation’s news programmes – has been “captured by a small group of people” promoting a pro-trans agenda and “keeping other perspectives off air”.

This has led to “a constant drip-feed of one-sided stories … celebrating the trans experience without adequate balance or objectivity”, a leaked internal BBC memo concludes. It said it reflected a “cultural problem across the BBC”, which treats issues of gender and sexuality as “a celebration of British diversity” rather than a complex and contentious subject.

The latest accusations of BBC bias come after The Telegraph revealed that a Panorama documentary doctored footage of a Donald Trump speech, and that the corporation minimised reports of Israeli suffering in the Gaza war to “paint Israel as the aggressor”.

Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has said “heads should roll” at the corporation, while Israel’s deputy foreign minister has called for the resignation of Tim Davie, the BBC’s director-general.

On Wednesday, Lord Grade, the head of Ofcom, the broadcasting watchdog, wrote to Samir Shah, the BBC’s chairman, urging him to “thoroughly” examine the allegations.

The debate around transgender rights, and children being given irreversible medical interventions such as puberty blockers, has been one of the most highly charged issues in politics, society and medicine in recent years.

It led to a Supreme Court ruling that “sex” referred to biological sex rather than gender identity, and the independent Cass Review of gender identity services, which resulted in the closure of the controversial Gender Identity Development Service at the Tavistock clinic in London.

But stories reflecting the views of people who challenged the concept of gender identity were largely suppressed by the BBC’s LGBT reporters, according to a memo written by a former member of the broadcaster’s editorial guidelines and standards committee.

The Telegraph has seen a copy of the 19-page memo, which was sent to members of the BBC Board last month and is now circulating in government departments.

It was compiled by Michael Prescott, who until June was an independent adviser to the BBC’s editorial guidelines and standards committee, and sent to executives because of his “despair at inaction by the BBC executive when issues come to light”.

It warns that the BBC is not only risking bias in its coverage of trans issues, but is confusing viewers by failing to make it clear that transgender women are biological males, or even transgender at all.
Mr Prescott writes in the memo that soon after he started his advisory role in 2022 he was approached by a BBC presenter, a reporter and a producer, all of whom had similar concerns about the broadcaster’s coverage of trans issues.
ragout-top
A BBC presenter contacted me about a month after I started working with the EGSC. He put me in touch with a reporter and a producer. All three were from different parts of the BBC but had shared concerns about BBC coverage of the trans issue.

The story that each person told me was what sounded like effective censorship by the specialist LGBTQ desk within News.

As virtually all shows had lost their own reporters, programme editors had to make requests to News if they wanted a correspondent to cover a story. I was told that time and time again, the LGBTQ desk staffers would decline to cover any story raising difficult questions about the trans debate.

The allegation made to me was stark: that the desk had been captured by a small group of people promoting the Stonewall view of the debate and keeping other perspectives off-air. Individual programmes had come to lack their own reporters as a counterweight.

What I was told chimed with what I saw for myself on BBC Online - that stories raising difficult questions about the 'trans agenda' were ignored even if they had been widely taken up and discussed across other media outlets.
There was also a constant drip-feed of one-sided stories, usually news features, celebrating the trans experience without adequate balance or objectivity.

Internal memo sent to BBC managers
Stonewall, the LGBT rights charity, has attracted growing controversy in recent years over its increasing focus on trans rights, resulting in all government departments, as well as the BBC, withdrawing from its Diversity Champions scheme for equal opportunity employers.

Mr Prescott had already noticed that stories raising difficult questions about the trans agenda were not being covered by the BBC, even when they were being widely reported elsewhere.

David Grossman, the editorial guidelines and standards committee’s senior editorial adviser, was asked to examine the BBC’s coverage of trans issues.
In October last year, he reported back to the committee and “found many shortcomings” in the BBC’s reporting.

On story selection, his report warned of an “unintended editorial bias”
“Significant voices” were too often missing from the BBC's coverage, including those who had transitioned and regretted their decision or those who had concerns about the process
The report couldn't find a single example in the review period that reflected the experience of de-transitioners

It noted there were more stories about the waiting times for people to receive care than examining the quality of that care itself.

It also noted a surprisingly high number of stories about drag queens considering it is such a niche group of people.

Stories that raised concerns about the quality or safety of care given to gender questioning children and adults received "little or no coverage"
In March 2024, there was widespread media coverage of leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health which raised concerns about he quality of care given to gender-distressed children. It was picked up by the Mail, Economist, Observer, Washington Post, the Times and others but not the BBC
There was also scant coverage of biological women campaigning to exclude biological men from sensitive spaces
The BBC failed to cover the story of Darlington nurses who took their employer to court for allowing their changing room to be used by biological males. This story was covered extensively by other news outlets including Sky News and GB News
Similarly, there was no coverage of claims biological male police and prison officers were being allowed to conduct strip searches on women and girls
The report warned that the phrase "assigned at birth" in relation to biological sex was appearing frequently in coverage, despite being advised against in guidelines
The report noted concerns with how the debate about the Cass Review was framed on Newsnight - the views of a doctor critical of the Tavistock Clinic were "balanced" with those of a trans woman, who said she had received excellent care. The report pointed out that if Newsnight was covering concerns about a maternity unit it would not seek to provide balance by interviewing a mother who was happy with her care
Expand
Internal memo sent to BBC managers
Among stories ignored by the BBC was the leaking of documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health in March 2024 that raised concerns about the quality of care given to gender-distressed children, which was covered by The Telegraph, the Daily Mail, the Economist, the Observer, the Washington Post, The Times and others.
Other media outlets gave extensive coverage to the WPATH story
The Telegraph, March 5 2024
Doctors admit link between transgender hormone therapy and cancer in leaked emails
The Economist, March 5
Leaked discussions reveal uncertainty about transgender care
The Mail, March 5
Trans healthcare doctors are exposed admitting that some patients are too young or mentally ill to understand the consequences of their treatment
The Guardian, March 9
Why disturbing leaks from US gender group WPATH ring alarm bells in the NHS
The Times, March 12
NHS bans puberty blockers for children
The BBC also failed to cover the story of Darlington nurses who took their employer to court for allowing their changing rooms to be used by biological males, or the story of biological male police and prison officers allegedly conducting strip searches on women and girls.
Mr Grossman noted concerns with the way the Cass Review was covered on Newsnight, which “balanced” the views of a doctor critical of the Tavistock clinic with those of a trans woman who said she had received excellent care.
The report said that if Newsnight were covering concerns about a maternity unit it would not seek “balance” by interviewing a mother who was happy with her care.
The one exception was the reporting of Newsnight’s Hannah Barnes, who broke a series of stories about the NHS gender identity service, but who has now left the BBC.
Mr Prescott says in his memo: “Her work might well now not be possible at the BBC, given the culture I describe combined with changes at Newsnight and the lack now of any programme-specific reporters.”
‘Constant drip feed of one-sided stories’
Instead of giving viewers, listeners and readers a balanced view of the trans debate, the BBC gave them “a constant drip-feed of one-sided stories, usually news features, celebrating the trans experience without adequate balance or objectivity”, the leaked memo says.
One “typical example” was the story of Gisele Shaw, “a gushing tale of a transgender wrestler who felt ‘liberated’ by coming out”, it says.
A story published on the BBC website in March 2023 “glossed over how the wrestler, who is a biological male, had repeatedly won trophies by competing in women’s competitions”.
 
After the quiet downfall of the Tranch, trannies with guns have been flourish on Xitter mostly through the "creator" space in 3D printing. They don't design anything, no, but they post about it and use photoshop a lot. Including this guy, "Zona"(I guess he named himself Arizona?).
GofzruhXEAA33Nr.jpg
ew.png
He is a self-described anarchist that promotes "safety and liberation"(archive) during the "ongoing genocide"(archive).
Currently he seems to be in a slapfight with other anarchists that do not like guns nor his, specifically, willingness to suggest illegal ownership.
nitter.net_SillyGirlPsyops_status_1986326866492530803.png
Tweet / Archive
 
Corporation’s LGBT desk ‘keeps other perspectives off air’, leaked internal dossier claims

The BBC’s trans coverage is subject to “effective censorship” by specialist LGBT reporters who refuse to cover gender-critical stories, one of the broadcaster’s own advisers has warned.
This is not really surprising if you have been following this on terf Twitter, but it's nice to know that we're not being gaslighted or overly paranoid.

It's the same pattern seen in the US about race and crimes. If there's a mugshot: it's a white person.
If there's no mugshot or race mentioned in the headline: it's a black person, they usually use a photo of the White victim.
If it's a Mexican crime it's even odds of using a mugshot or not.

It's amazing the patterns you can see if you notice things.
 
This has led to “a constant drip-feed of one-sided stories … celebrating the trans experience without adequate balance or objectivity”, a leaked internal BBC memo concludes. It said it reflected a “cultural problem across the BBC”, which treats issues of gender and sexuality as “a celebration of British diversity” rather than a complex and contentious subject.

Even after Savile the BBC is still being controlled by unrepentant nonces.
 
Was able to dig up some more on the rapehon I previously posted about, Minaya Valentina, who goes by she/fae pronouns.

I'm addition to his nsfw accounts, the rapehon also does gaming content under the handle transgamegal:
1000009931.png
1000010051.png
His tiktok and Instagram accounts are almost exclusively SJW content. Due to length most of these will be behind a spoiler save this one for reasons that will soon become evident.
1000010169.png
1000010168.png
1000010167.png
1000010056.png
1000010042.png
1000010046.png
1000010045.png
1000010041.png
1000010054.png
1000010052.png
Back to the tumblr that started this all, in addition to the rape fantasies he published about TERFs, he also writes a lot about children, particularly envisioning very young children as trans.
1000009915.png
1000009916.png
1000009920.png
1000009925.png
1000009924.png
While he has a rather empty Facebook under his current name, I was able to find what is likely his second under the pseudonym Beaux Miel:
1000010047.png
1000010048.png 1000010049.png
These are the variety of trans people where it's easy to find details about them due to the sheer volume of Go Fund Me's and begging. Here, we can see this account shared a Go Fund Me for their situationship.
1000010050.png
Their situationship has a very uncommon name, Akweley Mazarae. Here she is pictured with our rapehon.
1000009932.png
Akweley is a PhD student at UC Berkeley studying black trans studies and goes by he/xe/dey pronouns.
1000010165.png
She also has a Wordpress blog under her name where she has written a bit about their relationship, which was basically ddlg with extra steps. Unclear if she knows about the rapehun's pedo writings.
1000010166.png
1000010007.png
1000010008.png
1000010009.png
Akweley is a side story in all this, but I enjoy how her begging includes land acknowledgements.
1000010170.png
Some more of the rapehon's aliases via accounts used for begging:
1000009923.png 1000009928.png 1000009929.png
To end, the rapehun abhors the derogatory use of the word retarded.
1000010044.png
You will never be a woman, but you are a retard.
 
Some people just come out the womb mentally ill.
Certainly, but only recently the trooning and pooning is so trendy. I think the promise of non-negotiable social clout and the "look at special meeeee!!" factor is just too much to resist for some people.
Add in endless OTHER clout chasers that can get their good boy feefees by enabling this shit. Look at this girl, talented singer, covered in tats, I'm sure she's already accustomed to getting a lot of attention. Pooning out is like the ultimate snowflake evolution.
That's why she's coping so hard about her voice now. She knew it was one of the actual unique things she had going for her and she's fucked it all by pretending to be a man.
And I'm sure she got all the "science" provided to her and transitioning would mean she gets that Barry White speaking voice, and totally keep her nice little dainty disney princess singing voice, riiiiiiight? The science right???
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Help me out kiwibros, I'm a dumb ESL. I always thought "periods" meant exactly the same as "menstruation", which means the shedding of the uterus. And as far as I know, troons don't have uteruses. Am I wrong here?

Period is the correct term.​

We have pituitary glands just like cis women which run on a 21-28 day periodical cycle when in a estrogen dominant endocrine system. (for instance, one of the hormones it releases causes abdominal cramps and bloating by operating on smooth muscle tissue. In cis women it would trigger the shedding of the uterus lining and the fact it causes cramps elsewhere is mostly accidental)

Period is the correct term and cis women who for medical or intersex reasons don't bleed but still get the cramps and mood swings and what not don't have to deal with all of this gatekeeping of the term so we shouldn't either.

I don't like the idea of allowing rhetoric that seems to only be about how we are different from cis women to define us. I'd rather focus on what we have in common.

We are women. Trans women and cis women both being women despite their differences is an easy concept to grasp. Trans women and cis women having differences in their periods shouldn't be so hard.
Reddit

There's also this funny one:

I swear to god its like a curse.​

Whenever a cis woman or a tv show joke about periods, i just shrivel up inside and cry. It’s a reminder of everything i lack and will never be able to have.

Im pre op and at the very least it will be 3-4 years before i can even start the process. And I’m not confident at all that I’ll be able to get the results i want. Plus i have a lot of medical anxiety so something that intensive might be too much for me anyway.

And even i do get good results, I’ll never be able to have a period, i will never be able to get pregnant.

I feel like the rest of my life is pointless if i can’t even feel normal on my best day.
Reddit

They are so fucking obsessed about this subject lmao.
 

Załączniki

  • 12354113441.JPG
    12354113441.JPG
    108,8 KB · Wyświetlenia: 107
  • 31451344314321.JPG
    31451344314321.JPG
    65,7 KB · Wyświetlenia: 105
I know he’s an lolcow himself but I really liked Graham Linehan’s talk on how institutions—particularly the BBC—were captured. It’s not a surprise to anyone here (save for maybe a few lurkers) but I thought I’d share it in case you like the topic:
IMG_6980.jpeg
IMG_6981.jpeg
More info on this lovely woman
IMG_6983.jpeg
What a time to be alive lol
 
Help me out kiwibros, I'm a dumb ESL. I always thought "periods" meant exactly the same as "menstruation", which means the shedding of the uterus. And as far as I know, troons don't have uteruses. Am I wrong here?
I will explain: "menstruation" means bleeding from the vagina.
The 'gotcha' here is that real women who get surgery to remove their uterus, can still have "periods", not menstruation.

They (trannies and satanic doctors) define "periods" (in a rather misogynist idea lol) as a woman being crazy every month because of her hormones.

Menstruation = 'bleeding' from vagene
Period = monthly hormones make you crazy

Because trannies are psychotic and filling their body with unnatural amounts of synthetic estrogen, they think being crazy makes them a real woman.

Because being a real woman means being crazy every month, apparently.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I will explain: "menstruation" means bleeding from the vagina.
The 'gotcha' here is that real women who get surgery to remove their uterus, can still have "periods", not menstruation.

They (trannies and satanic doctors) define "periods" (in a rather misogynist idea lol) as a woman being crazy every month because of her hormones.
Hmm, I see. But aren't the mood swings and other symptoms called PMS?

In my language the equivalent of "period" is the "cycle" aka menstrual cycle, so there's no difference between them. It makes no sense to talk about a cycle without actually menstruating.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole