US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
That could've been cleared up if somebody posted another vid of a powerful politician responding to a question about pardoning a convicted child sex trafficker with a similar response right? That's how this tangent started. Still can be cleared up. If ya got one post it.

Edit: that direct too, the question explicitly mentioning "will you pardon this convicted child trafficker?", not some billionaire chink who had cp or whatever getting a pardon.

My magic phone has Google. You should check to see if yours does too.

I’m sorry you’re angry. Hope your night gets better. ❤️


The Justice Department’s Office of the Pardon Attorney reports clemency totals by grant type and president, but does not publish a historical, offense‑level breakdown that isolates child‑sex crimes across all grants since 1789. See DOJ’s overview of clemency statistics for context (DOJ OPA) and pardon process info (DOJ OPA).

Documented examples often cited


Peter Yarrow (folk group Peter, Paul and Mary)


Conviction: 1970, taking indecent liberties with a 14‑year‑old in Washington, D.C.

Clemency: Full presidential pardon by Jimmy Carter on Jan. 19, 1981.


Sources: NPR’s coverage notes the conviction and later pardon, and Yarrow’s own public apology; Yarrow’s biography also documents the Carter pardon (NPR, Wikipedia summary).


Mel Reynolds (former U.S. Representative)


Conviction history: In 1995, convicted in Illinois for sexual misconduct with a 16‑year‑old; later convicted on federal bank‑fraud charges.


Clemency: In 2001, President Bill Clinton commuted Reynolds’s federal sentence for bank fraud. The clemency did not apply to his earlier state sex‑offense conviction, which presidents cannot pardon. Whether to “count” Reynolds depends on your definition (i.e., any clemency for a person who has a child‑sex conviction vs. clemency for the child‑sex offense itself).


Sources: Contemporary reporting on Clinton’s final clemency list and Reynolds’s cases (New York Times overview, Jan. 21, 2001; background summary in Wikipedia).


There may be other isolated instances (particularly in older D.C. or military cases), but they are not compiled in an official, searchable way, and many pre‑digital grants are only documented in scattered archives.
 
I think in Venezuela they're preparing a military coup. Not a gay CIA type, but sending in some soldiers to destabilize and whisper to General Churro "hey, get rid of Madurro and you can have El Salvador 2.0 and we'll come in and bomb the druggies, do you feel bonita?"
This is the most likely option, the only people willing to fight and die for them are the literal boomers that voted Chavez in the first place and criminals (and only a few because this is the only country you can bond with a thief by shitting on the goverment because there's nothing he can take from you), i cannot stress enough how unlikable these retards are, the only people he can use to defend him are all sourced from neighboring countries like Colombia or Brazil or Cuba (hell he even had to ship the wagner group to here to defend our version of the white house), a military coup is 100% what is going to happen, no doubt about it, people is itching for another round, despite the repression in last year riot they still want blood, i know i want.
 
I think in Venezuela they're preparing a military coup. Not a gay CIA type, but sending in some small squads of soldiers to destabilize and whisper to General Churro "hey, get rid of Madurro and you can have El Salvador 2.0 and we'll come in and bomb the druggies, do you feel bonita?"
I think a coup in Venezuela will most likely have to involve some glowie fed shenanigans, but that doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing. Glowies were the reason why Pinochet got in charge, and we all know how much of a classic his reign was. The feds can be surprisingly alright when they aren't secretly prosecuting any instance of true right-wing organization, giving crack to niggers, doing Wacos and Ruby Ridges, infringing upon constitutional liberties, and helping commie hippies take over the culture in an attempt to win the cultural front of the Cold War, among other things.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The ACA dramatically drove up healthcare costs and this bill supposedly cuts subsidies that offset some of those costs, especially for individual plans.
The ACA has been a big mess since the beginning. President Obama's, "If you like your existing plan, you can keep it," was so much of a lie it broke Maury Povich's lie detector.

Individuals get screwed over the most with their costs. Those who get plans through their job, if I recall, have limits on how much they have to contribute for the premiums to be deemed affordable. That provision doesn't exist for individual plans and they end up paying a disproportionate amount of premium even thought they need the cost controls more. The deductibles are the killer; they increase in abrupt steps and not on a gradual sliding scale. A mere $1000 increase in income can make one's deductible increase disproportionately. Not only that, individuals have to cover the portion not written off by insurance until they hit their individual or family deductible.

I believe the sticking point with the budget relates to a change from COVID. With so many people not working, everyone with an individual plan was allowed to receive the maximum allowable subsidy when it was previously based on a ratio of income against the Federal Poverty Line. That provision expires this year, and Dems seem to want that provision continued even thought the COVID crisis is effectively over and most people with reduced hours from 2020-2021 are back working again.

I'm not sure if Republicans want to go back to the income based subsidies or eliminate them altogether, but they definitely want the COVID gibs to expire and not be renewed. I'd hope subsidies aren't eliminated outright because the people who need coverage and the subsidies the most would see their premiums skyrocket and even double.
 
So she couldn't even keep her narrative together.
Candice Owens testifying before Congress regarding Israel:

"I am not crazy! I know they killed Charlie Kirk! As if I could ever make such a mistake. Never. Never! I just – I just couldn’t prove it. He covered his tracks, he got that idiot at the Israeli consulate to lie for him. You think this is something? You think this is bad? This? This chicanery? He’s done worse. PALESTINE! Are you telling me that a man just happens to fall with a parachute on October 7th like that? No! He orchestrated it! Heeby! He defecated through a sunroof! And I saved him! And I shouldn’t have. I took him into my own country! What was I thinking? They'll never change. They'll never change! Ever since 1948, always the same! Couldn’t keep their hands out of the US military budget! But not our Heeby! Couldn’t be precious Heeby! Stealing them blind! And THEY get to be a country? What a sick joke! I should’ve stopped them when I had the chance! …And you, you have to stop them! You...."
Candace-Owens.jpg
 
I think a coup in Venezuela will most likely have to involve some glowie fed shenanigans, but that doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing. Glowies were the reason why Pinochet got in charge, and we all know how much of a classic his reign was. The feds can be surprisingly alright when they aren't secretly prosecuting any instance of true right-wing organization, giving crack to niggers, doing Wacos and Ruby Ridges, infringing upon constitutional liberties, and helping commie hippies take over the culture to win the cultural front of the Cold War, among other things.
We'll see what happens, the Venezuelan opposition kind of has a history of being incompetent and unwilling to act. Something to consider is that unlike Allende's Chile, its socialist dictatorship has been entrenched for multiple decades at this point and probably has a number of loyalists in high-ranking military positions. Maduro has crushed any sort of domestic discontent he has ran into thus far.

On the topic of the Bolivarian Republic, recently its government warned the United States of an alleged ‘extremist’ plan to attack US embassy complex. It claims that right-wing groups posing as followers of the Venezuelan President are planning a false-flag operation.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
You can put all the silly niggers you like on television, I'm still going to blame Mossad for Charlie Kirk's assassination.
I mean that's cool and everything but you'll still be wrong.
I severely doubt that even the Mossad has the power of "Utah Mormon tranny chasing furry faggot sleeper agents" at their disposal.
That seems like something that the United States army would develop first.
 
The ACA has been a big mess since the beginning. President Obama's, "If you like your existing plan, you can keep it," was so much of a lie it broke Maury Povich's lie detector.

Individuals get screwed over the most with their costs. Those who get plans through their job, if I recall, have limits on how much they have to contribute for the premiums to be deemed affordable. That provision doesn't exist for individual plans and they end up paying a disproportionate amount of premium even thought they need the cost controls more. The deductibles are the killer; they increase in abrupt steps and not on a gradual sliding scale. A mere $1000 increase in income can make one's deductible increase disproportionately. Not only that, individuals have to cover the portion not written off by insurance until they hit their individual or family deductible.

I believe the sticking point with the budget relates to a change from COVID. With so many people not working, everyone with an individual plan was allowed to receive the maximum allowable subsidy when it was previously based on a ratio of income against the Federal Poverty Line. That provision expires this year, and Dems seem to want that provision continued even thought the COVID crisis is effectively over and most people with reduced hours from 2020-2021 are back working again.

I'm not sure if Republicans want to go back to the income based subsidies or eliminate them altogether, but they definitely want the COVID gibs to expire and not be renewed. I'd hope subsidies aren't eliminated outright because the people who need coverage and the subsidies the most would see their premiums skyrocket and even double.
Is there any basis for the claim dems are currently fighting for illegal aliens to be covered?
 
This is the most likely option, the only people willing to fight and die for them are the literal boomers that voted Chavez in the first place and criminals (and only a few because this is the only country you can bond with a thief by shitting on the goverment because there's nothing he can take from you), i cannot stress enough how unlikable these retards are, the only people he can use to defend him are all sourced from neighboring countries like Colombia or Brazil or Cuba (hell he even had to ship the wagner group to here to defend our version of the white house), a military coup is 100% what is going to happen, no doubt about it, people is itching for another round, despite the repression in last year riot they still want blood, i know i want.
So coup likely before the year is over? Its going to end up as fast as Syria was in November. I still hope Cuba falls in the next 10 to 15 years.
 
Netayahoo released a letter from Kirk that refuted her accusations. Courtesy Catch The Rainbow
Curious that letter was undated, right? I can think Charlie was cooling on support of Israel, having second thoughts about zionism, and was killed by some maniac leftist furry retard. I don't think anyone could say i was wrong about any of those. If someone claims Charlie was killed because of his stance on Israel they are a deeply unserious faggot and they are giving giving cover to the person that actually killed him.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole