🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.

Doe v. Bonnell 1:25-cv-20757 — District Court, S.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    1:25-cv-20757
  • Court
    District Court, S.D. Florida
  • Filed
    17 Lut 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    440 Civil Rights: Other
  • Cause
    28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Defendant
  • Last Filing
    29 Cze 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Steven Bonnell, II, Jane Doe

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 367)

# Date Description Filing
280 29 Cze 2026 PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING HEARING. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, ECF Nos. 251, 262 is hereby SET before the undersigned on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Courthouse, Courtroom 11-4, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. Given that the Motions pertain to evidence central to the resolution of Plaintiff's claims, this matter is hereby removed from its current trial calendar and shall be reset after the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra (drn) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
29 Cze 2026  
29 Cze 2026 SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 279 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (2213918)
29 Cze 2026  
29 Cze 2026 SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 281 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (766837)
Cannot wait for NSE's big "why I had to disown Destiny" arc. Will probably get her some views. She should clout-shark off destiny for as long as possible while signalling why she might be having issues with the left.

If she times it perfectly, she'll get a big boost before fading into obscurity.
Her best bet, unironically, is to pull a Maitland Ward, who was an actress on boy meets world (the redhead) who out of the blue, just a few years ago, went into mainstream porn riding purely on the hype of her being an ex-kid's show actress.

Now, Maitland made millions of dollars off this turn, and was a somewhat attractive middle age women, NSE is not, and won't make nearly as much, but whoring out is at least an avenue to SOME revenue for this Horse-damaged retard.
 
I wonder how plausible the idea solo just found Rose’s shit from some indexed attachment when discords CDN was still vulnerable to that and just used the whole bf cover for the truth. It’s more work for sure and a more complicated explanation, but not implausible. A lot of open questions for how he got access to everything else, and whether he was initially targeting Destiny or rose and all that. Not optimistic we’ll ever know.
 
honestly there is nothing that really sticks out
except this maybe
Wyświetl załącznik 8005051
I want to say in this in the softest way possible, as I hold no ill will towards jstlk, but it's pretty funny how autistic and retarded everyone acted towards the accusation from Solo of Rose being underaged.
He has the most neutral way of typing whenever he was giving info on Rose, you could tell he was 100% saying the truth. It's pretty funny reading them back not because of him but because of how people reacted to what he was saying.
Niggas freaking out on his face, calling him a liar and him just saying essentially "it's the truth and you are retarded for reposting CSAM".

Once again, one of the strongest indications that he was saying the truth is that he refused to leak any nsfw picture of Rose, the only reason this would make sense, in a situation in which he's basically burning the house down using her account, is if he was saying the truth.

Tbf to jstlk, it was also the popular opinion in the thread, that he was lying, wasn't it?

I still fully believe that everyone (not in the thread) acted extremely cowardly in regards to this Rose topic, people were terrified of even accusing him directly or encourage Rose being found, because they were terrified of a defamation case.
Destiny had doxxed them, harassed them, and bullied them for months, and they still refused to actually take a strong stance regarding Rose, only once it was safe and 100% confirmed did they do anything about it.
 
used the whole bf cover for the truth.
You wouldn't be the first one to think this is suspicious
solo is rose.png
solo is rose2.png
solo is rose3.png

And this,
He's not sure if she was underaged in those nudes
rose is underaged.png

Jstlk was also surprised it took kf longer to figure out who she was.
jstlk diggers.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I used to think that Solo and Rose were the same person, until "he" came back in the thread and posted that Death Note clip. I don't know how to explain it, but it felt like something only a 18-20 year old " boy" would do.

Honestly, there's way too many conflicting info to actually have a concrete answer tbh.
I will say tho, in their DMs, between Rose and Destiny, she complains about long distance relationships.
Solo consistently writes like a bonger.
And, I believe, Solo mentioned that he had the account for a while, but only got the idea of leaking everything until Destiny tried to message the Rose account again (I may be misremembering), I personally believe that he saw something in there that made him mad, like, Destiny encouraging Rose to break up with his long distance bf and she actually followed the advice.

I say this because, Solo genuinely comes off like he has a genuine grudge against Destiny, and Rose sexting with him isn't a good enough explanation, as Rose's bf was aware of it while it was going it (she mentions how he pointed her Discord Dms during Destiny's and Fuentes' stream). Just my 2 cents.

But idk, there's people who say he doesn't exist, or others that he must have lived in the same city as her, or that he's one of the Thorp's orbiters, idk.
He's not sure if she was underaged in those nudes
She deleted her twitter account like a week or two after her @ was shown on stream, you can tell because there's no newer mentions if you namesearch her in twitter, also, I also noticed when she deleted it because I started to keep an eye on her account after Destiny accidentally leaked her Discord name.
This means all pictures that we had of her nsfw or not, before Kyla Turner found her, were while she was a minor.
 
I wonder how plausible the idea solo just found Rose’s shit from some indexed attachment when discords CDN was still vulnerable to that and just used the whole bf cover for the truth. It’s more work for sure and a more complicated explanation, but not implausible. A lot of open questions for how he got access to everything else, and whether he was initially targeting Destiny or rose and all that. Not optimistic we’ll ever know.

I think the BF angle makes most sense when you consider that the videos she made(and later sent to Tiny) were screen recordings of skype calls so it makes sense for her to have an accomplice in all of this.
 
Death Note clip
from an earlier screenshot he mentions "futa". Anime coomer most definitely.
even worse.
And, I believe, Solo mentioned that he had the account for a while, but only got the idea of leaking everything until Destiny tried to message the Rose account again (I may be misremembering), I personally believe that he saw something in there that made him mad, like, Destiny encouraging Rose to break up with his long distance bf and she actually followed the advice.
When cuck becomes the bull lol
(and adds some reasonable motive to the leaker)
I say this because, Solo genuinely comes off like he has a genuine grudge against Destiny, and Rose sexting with him isn't a good enough explanation, as Rose's bf was aware of it while it was going it (she mentions how he pointed her Discord Dms during Destiny's and Fuentes' stream). Just my 2 cents.
Most reasonable explanation so far. It would seem too random for it to be somebody who has no connection to Rose just to exploit a loophole in a security. Sure, Tiny has a lot of enemies, but she was a nobody and nobody suspected he got up to this shit (aside from his orbiters.)

You could try and create a schizo theory about how it's actually a bitter orbiter who leaked this, but i'm not so sure yet.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
These denials are with regards to the motions that were attempting to have Destiny to be responsible for removing/requesting the removal of the leaked files and also the motion to enjoin kiwifarms in the case to remove the files. Which were a bit silly (as Null mentioned when this originally came up) but were also successful in getting the videos down. Not really a big deal as these aren't material to the claim but on a quick read the judge does seem a bit miffed that the filings were UNHINGED!!!
 
Here are the two orders from the magistrate judge.


Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Order to Compel Lolcow LLC to Remove Videos

142_page01.webp142_page02.webp142_page03.webp142_page04.webp142_page05.webp142_page06.webp142_page07.webp142_page08.webp

Summary​

This Order addresses Plaintiff Jane Doe's motion asking the Court to issue an order that would legally compel (force) the non-party company Lolcow LLC (which operates the website Kiwi Farms) to permanently remove several identified links (URLs) containing a sensitive video. The Plaintiff and Kiwi Farms had reportedly reached an "agreed proposed order" under which Kiwi Farms would comply, but only if the Court formally ordered it.

The Court DENIED the Plaintiff's motion. The primary legal reasoning is that the Court does not have the authority to issue the requested relief against an entity that is not formally a party to the lawsuit. While the motion was filed as a "motion to compel" (typically used to force parties to provide documents during discovery), the Court determined that the Plaintiff was actually asking for a type of injunction (a court order that forces someone to take a specific action). Under Federal law, a court can only issue an injunction against the actual parties involved in the case, or their agents. Since Kiwi Farms is a non-party and not closely associated with either the Plaintiff or Defendant, the Court ruled it is beyond its "injunctive power."

The denial means that the videos remain on the Kiwi Farms website, as the Plaintiff has failed to establish a legal basis for this Court to force the non-party site to remove the content. The Court also noted technical flaws in the proposed order, which incorrectly sought the "permanent removal" of the URL (the web address itself) rather than the deletion of the underlying content.

Key Takeaways​

  • Decision: Plaintiff Jane Doe's motion to compel Lolcow LLC (Kiwi Farms) to remove the videos is DENIED.
  • Reasoning: Kiwi Farms is a non-party to the lawsuit and is therefore outside the Court's power to issue an injunction (a mandatory action order).
  • Significance: The Court cannot force the non-party website to take down the video content using this specific legal maneuver.

Bottom Line​

This document is a significant setback for the Plaintiff's efforts to have the videos removed, as the Court has ruled it lacks the jurisdiction to force the website hosting the content to act.

Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction

143_page01.webp143_page02.webp143_page03.webp143_page04.webp143_page05.webp143_page06.webp143_page07.webp143_page08.webp143_page09.webp143_page10.webp143_page11.webp143_page12.webp143_page13.webp143_page14.webp143_page15.webp

Summary​

This is a court order in which a U.S. Magistrate Judge DENIES Plaintiff Jane Doe's request for a preliminary injunction against Defendant Steven Bonnell II. A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary request to force a party to immediately take or stop taking certain actions while the lawsuit is still pending, in this case, to stop the sharing and compel the removal of a sexually explicit video (the "Video").

The Court denied the motion primarily because the Plaintiff failed to demonstrate "irreparable harm" (damage that cannot be fixed with a monetary award later). The court noted that the video has been publicly available online since November 2024, and the Plaintiff waited approximately five months after the most recent public posting on Kiwi Farms to file her motion. This significant delay undermined the argument that the harm was "imminent" or required "speedy and urgent action." Furthermore, the court cited the Plaintiff’s own social media statement indicating that a primary goal of the lawsuit was for the Defendant to suffer a financial penalty, which suggests the injury could be adequately addressed through a legal remedy (money) at the conclusion of the case.

The denial is based on procedural grounds (failure to meet the high legal standard for an injunction) and not on the ultimate merits (the core truth) of the Plaintiff's claims. The underlying lawsuit will continue to move forward toward a final judgment, which could still include a permanent injunction and financial damages if the Plaintiff wins the case. The Court also noted an existing question of whether it has the proper federal subject matter jurisdiction (the authority to hear the case) at all, which also weighed against finding the Plaintiff had a high likelihood of winning.

Key Takeaways​

  • Decision: The Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED.
  • Reasoning: The Plaintiff did not prove "irreparable harm" due to the five-month delay in seeking the injunction and because her stated goal appeared to be financial compensation, which is a legal remedy available later.
  • Scope: This ruling addresses the request for immediate, emergency relief and does not determine the final outcome of the case.
  • Procedural Order: The Court ordered that, going forward, parties must include links to online images or documents (like Google Drive or Imgur) as actual exhibits to their filings. The Court will not open random links for security reasons.

Important Dates​

  • Delay Window: Plaintiff waited roughly five months from the November 29, 2024, Kiwi Farms posting to file the injunction request.

Bottom Line​

The court has ruled that the immediate, emergency-style relief the Plaintiff sought to have the video removed is not necessary because the damage has already been done, and the Plaintiff waited too long to ask for the order. The lawsuit for damages and a final judgment proceeds.
 

Załączniki

  • 142.pdf
    142.pdf
    118,2 KB · Wyświetlenia: 24
  • 143.pdf
    143.pdf
    147 KB · Wyświetlenia: 23
I don’t understand Jesus Pea’s argument. If the video was accessible after Cardi’s effective date, and people could access Rose’s account, that means it was publicly available after October 1 so he is liable. Alternatively, if the fact that we can find the video through an indexed metadata search means it is publicly available, then he is also liable. Do it mean that he is responsible for the fact it is publicly available throught search?
 
I read the Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Order to Compel Lolcow LLC to Remove Videos.

It's very easy to summarize. The judge complains that Plaintiff's motion contains misunderstandings about the nature of URLs and some phrasing related issues. This is however not relevant to the ultimate ruling. The motion got simply denied because Kiwi Farms is not a party to the case, which is why the court has no power to compel here.

"... nonparty Kiwi Farms is beyond the reach of this Court’s injunctive power at least based on the nature of the pending action"

Don't know how this is a big victory for Destiny.
 
It's not a big victory for destiny. The judge even wrote in the prelim injunction denial that the denial is without prejudice to the plaintiff and the merits of the case that may require injunctive relief should the case succeed.

The prelim injunction ask was a bit of a long shot anyway based on the requirements to establish it would have been needed.

It's not like Destiny has succeeded in having this case dismissed yet or anything like that.
 
Wow guys this is great for Pxie! The judge is geeen lighting a motion for spoliation, not only once, but twice! Right Zipzip? Right Destiny ?
IMG_2407.jpeg

IMG_2410.jpeg

So the KF thing is denied because Lolcow llc isnt a party to the case. The preliminary injunction is denied because of the time taken to file it + the admissions that the harm is mostly already done. Legitimate.

At least the judge sees Pxie as a credible witness
IMG_2409.jpeg
 
These denials are with regards to the motions that were attempting to have Destiny to be responsible for removing/requesting the removal of the leaked files and also the motion to enjoin kiwifarms in the case to remove the files. Which were a bit silly (as Null mentioned when this originally came up) but were also successful in getting the videos down. Not really a big deal as these aren't material to the claim but on a quick read the judge does seem a bit miffed that the filings were UNHINGED!!!
Remember remember-the MAIN GOAL is to maximize the raped one's billable hours,not win.Motion everything.Make everything that will keep his lawyers getting paid.Even if you lose.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole