Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Sooo.......I saw this tweet. This may be the strangest one yet. Apparently Fur Affinity removes images showing any kind of support for Charlie Kirk. I think the tweet is pretty self explanitory. Every aspect and side of this one is upsetting.

Also I have no clue who 'hyper imaginative' is. Their bio is that they are christian. I assume thats why his profile was shown to me.

Screenshot_20250920_092726_X.webp
 
If people start violently going after the opposition, and encouraging it. Which is what I have actually seen some people here doing. That just escalated. It won't fix it. And the leftists, that aren't celebrating are going to likely become more radical themselves.
It's already escalated.

And I have seen a lot of people that are on the left that aren't insane progressive tranny communists. That have the common sense reaction, that it was wrong for him to be shot.
Yet they refuse to purge the revolutionary communists from their ranks so long as whores still have the right to murder their babies.
 
Sooo.......I saw this tweet. This may be the strangest one yet. Apparently Fur Affinity removes images showing any kind of support for Charlie Kirk. I think the tweet is pretty self explanitory. Every aspect and side of this one is upsetting.

Also I have no clue who 'hyper imaginative' is. Their bio is that they are christian. I assume thats why his profile was shown to me.

Wyświetl załącznik 7941451
I'm sure FA is going to get sued by the Kirk family and the US Government as their website isn't a private social media platform but a publisher. Let's see where this will go.
 
The right has committed violence in the past, it is dishonest to say otherwise.
Show me an 3 examples since 1900 in the United States (we'll keep abraham Lincoln and franco out of it)

In your examples, were these "right wing violence" in retaliation? Were they isolated incidents or government backed funded like leftist violence is?
 
Imagine being so mentally ill and bloodthirsty for the most milquetoast activist's head that you genuinely believe that all of society will rise up and stand in solidarity with your blatant crime like it's a Karl Marx revolutionary fever dream.
This is literally something that anarchists used to call "the propaganda of the deed." Look it up. It involved assassinating prominent individuals, and the concept was this would somehow inspire revolution.

Bakunin and Kropotkin and Emma Goldman pushed this bullshit ideology.

Instead, whenever these murderous idiots pursued their ideology with actual murders and assassinations, the general public immediately turned upon the idiotic ideologies that these vile acts of terrorism were inspired by.

Amazingly, at least to retarded terrorists, acts of terrorism don't make people afraid of you in a free country, they make people hate TERRORISTS. Shooting a man for disagreeing with you in front of his family makes people fucking HATE you and HATE your evil ideology, because any ideology that leads to a vile act like that is obviously evil itself.
 
How far back do you want to go to see who started it? French revolution? Do we look at communists and fascists/nazis beating each other in the 20s? Do we look at the Black Panthers? The Summer of Love hippies of '67? Or the Summer of Love of the 2020s? Who started "it" and when?
The left started it. Even if not starting it, the sheer scale (social, monetary, volume) of leftist violence far far outshines anything the right has done

While "right wing violence" is typically an isolated incident of a random yahoo taking out few people on his own, leftist violence has backing and funding, is socially encouraged and has far far more victims

There is a major difference between the rare right wingers snapping and going on a rampage vs the lefts orchestrated and pre meditated terror such as: the holocaust, the holodomir, the great leap forward, waco, Kennedy assassinations, trump assassinations, 9/11, Charlottesville, all of the major school shooting (sandy hook, and that one Florida one) Oklahoma city bombings, etc
 
Show me an 3 examples since 1900 in the United States (we'll keep abraham Lincoln and franco out of it)

In your examples, were these "right wing violence" in retaliation? Were they isolated incidents or government backed funded like leftist violence is?
why does it have to be since 1900?
Is violence against separate people justified when done in retaliation?
Government funded by the US government? I don't think italian anarchists were US-funded.

What do you mean with right-wing violence and left-wing violence?

Because I define it in the broadest terms, with any violence done by someone associated with the right, toards someone associated with the left, done for political motivations. Do you think that during protests there were not three right-wing guys who punched leftists, in three separate occasions?

My point is that it doesn't matter who started it. It sounds like children arguing in a playground. Or like who started what in the israel/palestine conflict, or other middle east forever wars. You can sperg forever about who started it, I want to look at what it is going on now and how we move forward.

In the last few decades, violence has become more mainstream in the left, whilst it remained fringe in the right.
 
I request you forgive the Gen Z (And Alpha) Democrats, and see things from their perspective. They have been primarily raised into political consciousness by TDS-infected single parents and mothers. The parent comes home from their publicly funded job to complain to their children, instead of their spouse, that Trump tweeted something mean on Twitter. She then tunes into Samantha Bee™ Full Frontal™ where they talk more about how Trump is the devil and evil incarnate. They're probably subscribed to the New York Times or MS
And these are all positions her mother supports and reiterates and reinforces.
This is the age of Trump. Gen Alpha has never known anything other than Trump, and half of Gen Z has never known anything other than Trump. (Autopen Biden doesn't count, since everyone on the left still spent those 4 years talking 24/7 about Trump)
Is it any wonder she holds these positions her mother and the news and teachers and "comedy" shows have programmed her to believe are not only correct, but morally good?

7903877-af70a6ef7ba678571d607914a4da2879.mp4
There's been a lot of focus on the news and I think this is over the target. We can't allow the belief that Charlie was in some way a fascist white supremacist who deserved it to become acceptable maonstrea
Could you imagine some right winger making this same video, but with Biden/Harris. People would be calling CPS and calling it extremist indoctrination.

Teaching your kids Christian morals and there are only two genders......child abuse and CPS needs to get involved. Teaching your kids to hope a democratically elected president and vice president are killed, you go girl teach em young.

I feel bad these girls have no chance in life. They will grow into perpetual victim mentality and will end up going down the progressive cult rabbithole. Society is cooked.
 
Democrats still don't have anyone they can run in 2028, or anyone who has wide appeal.
I wouldn't be so quick to that punch. They don't have wide appeal but never underestimate the stupidity and blind loyalty of their voters. There will still be a strong blue block of voters in California and Illinois that will absolutely vote for AOC, Gavin Newsome, or some other shitlib leftist that manages to get the democrat party endorsement.

They will still have a fighting chance, because their voter base typically will vote blue no matter who.
 
"Why is Trump so sensitive and thin skinned when we say that the guy who killed Charlie Kirk was on his team? Fascist!"
Thats just the thing, they really think all of this is about Trump being hurt, because that's all their poisoned minds can process. They think all of us are mad because of how this impacts Trump. They can't understand that we see demonic freak behavior surrounding the assassination of an innocent Christian man and are repulsed by it and have been repulsed by this behavior for years, it has nothing to do with Trump.

They can't comprehend just how many actually voted for deportations, stopping foreign worker invasions, stopping the mutilation of children, smashing the progressive hold on media, all of it. Trump is not an emperor doing all of this on his own, we are demanding all of this be done. Its laughable how they so foolishly can't comprehend how moderate Trump really is and what would happen if most of us on this site could make the decisions ourselves for about a month.
 
I request you forgive the Gen Z (And Alpha) Democrats, and see things from their perspective. They have been primarily raised into political consciousness by TDS-infected single parents and mothers. The parent comes home from their publicly funded job to complain to their children, instead of their spouse, that Trump tweeted something mean on Twitter. She then tunes into Samantha Bee™ Full Frontal™ where they talk more about how Trump is the devil and evil incarnate. They're probably subscribed to the New York Times or MS
And these are all positions her mother supports and reiterates and reinforces.
This is the age of Trump. Gen Alpha has never known anything other than Trump, and half of Gen Z has never known anything other than Trump. (Autopen Biden doesn't count, since everyone on the left still spent those 4 years talking 24/7 about Trump)
Is it any wonder she holds these positions her mother and the news and teachers and "comedy" shows have programmed her to believe are not only correct, but morally good?

7903877-af70a6ef7ba678571d607914a4da2879.mp4
There's been a lot of focus on the news and I think this is over the target. We can't allow the belief that Charlie was in some way a fascist white supremacist who deserved it to become acceptable maonstrea
This reminded me of this (35:40):
Not about Trump, but it is the same sentiment
 
Just wanted to say that shoe's video was literally an eye opener for a large group of friends who were still kind on the fence on the situation. Most of them moderate lefties, some "let's punch nazis" lefties, but the reception to her video in my friend group was really good and changed a lot of people's views on the situation. I'm talking about a 30+ people group with a 90:10 split on current politics but who are still friends since the early 2000s.
I recommend showing that video for anyone you know still on the fence or moderately left. Of course so crazies will still try to push their agenda, but those people have no saving anyway and you should just keep your distance.
 
why does it have to be since 1900?
Is violence against separate people justified when done in retaliation?
Government funded by the US government? I don't think italian anarchists were US-funded.

What do you mean with right-wing violence and left-wing violence?

Because I define it in the broadest terms, with any violence done by someone associated with the right, toards someone associated with the left, done for political motivations. Do you think that during protests there were not three right-wing guys who punched leftists, in three separate occasions?

My point is that it doesn't matter who started it. It sounds like children arguing in a playground. Or like who started what in the israel/palestine conflict, or other middle east forever wars. You can sperg forever about who started it, I want to look at what it is going on now and how we move forward.

In the last few decades, violence has become more mainstream in the left, whilst it remained fringe in the right.
Who started it is PARAMOUNT in determining the reaction
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole