War Man Charged With Assaulting Federal Agent With Sandwich in D.C. - A video showed a man repeatedly calling a group of officers “fascists” before throwing a sub sandwich at one.

A man accused of throwing a sandwich at a federal agent who was patrolling Washington this week, after calling him and other agents “fascists,” was charged with assaulting a federal officer on Wednesday.

The police said the man threw a “sub-style” sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer on Sunday night, the day before President Trump’s announcement that his administration was temporarily taking over Washington’s police force and sending National Guard troops and federal agents into the city for patrols.

A video of the interaction went viral, showing a man repeatedly yelling at the agents near the corner of 14th and U Streets in Northwest D.C., a popular part of the city filled with bars and restaurants. “Shame! Shame!” he yelled from across the street.

At some point, the video shows, he got closer to the officers and warned them to back up while berating them.

After minutes of yelling, the man paused briefly, wound up and threw the sandwich into the chest of the C.B.P. officer, then ran into the street as officers chased him. A transit police detective, Daina Henry, included screenshots of the video in an affidavit that was included with the criminal complaint.

The detective wrote that the man charged in the crime, identified as Sean C. Dunn, 37, had confessed after he was apprehended. “I did it. I threw the sandwich,” the detective quoted him as saying.

Court records did not list a lawyer for Mr. Dunn or any scheduled court hearings, and he did not respond to requests for comment. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, whose police officers arrested Mr. Dunn, said he had been released pending a court date.

The crime he is charged with carries a maximum of one year in prison, or up to eight years if it involves “physical contact” or the intent to commit another felony, according to the law.

The officer who was struck with the sandwich did not appear injured in the video and was among those who immediately gave chase.

The video has become emblematic of how some Washington residents feel about Mr. Trump’s injection of federal law enforcement officers into the city’s streets. It has also been condemned by others as indicative of disrespect and dehumanization of the police.

The case was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, meaning it will be prosecuted by the U.S. attorney’s office now led by Jeanine Pirro, who was nominated by Mr. Trump and has vocally supported his latest initiative.

In a video online, Ms. Pirro said the sandwich thrown at the agent was from Subway, as many had speculated and as a photograph of a wrapper, apparently taken from the scene, had shown.

“He thought it was funny,” Ms. Pirro said of the defendant in a video posted online. “Well, he doesn’t think it’s funny today, because we charged with him with a felony.”

Kirsten Noyes contributed research.
Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs reports on national stories across the United States with a focus on criminal justice. He is from upstate New York.

 
Prosecutors Fail to Secure Indictment Against Man Who Threw Sandwich at Federal Agent
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Alan Feuer, Devlin Barrett, and William K. Rashbaum
2025-08-27 14:32:27GMT
Federal prosecutors on Tuesday were unable to persuade a grand jury to approve a felony indictment against a man who threw a sandwich at a federal agent on the streets of Washington this month, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The grand jury’s rejection of the felony charge was a remarkable failure by the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington and the second time in recent days that a majority of grand jurors refused to vote to indict a person accused of felony assault on a federal agent. It also amounted to a sharp rebuke by a panel of ordinary citizens against the prosecutors assigned to bring charges against people arrested after President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops and federal agents to fight crime and patrol the city’s streets.

The rejection by grand jurors was particularly noteworthy given the attention paid to the case of the man who threw the sandwich, Sean C. Dunn. Video of the episode went viral on social media, senior officials talked about the case, and the administration posted footage of a large group of heavily armed law enforcement officers going to Mr. Dunn’s apartment.

It remained unclear if prosecutors planned to try again to obtain an indictment against Mr. Dunn, 37, a former Justice Department paralegal. They could also forgo seeking felony charges and refile his case as a misdemeanor, which does not require an indictment to move forward.

Mr. Dunn was initially charged on Aug. 13 in a criminal complaint accusing him of throwing a submarine sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer who was on patrol with other federal agents near the corner of 14th and U Streets in the northwest section of the capital, a popular part of the city filled with bars and restaurants.

Before he threw the sandwich, the complaint asserts, Mr. Dunn stood within inches of the officer, calling him and his colleagues “fascists” and shouting, “I don’t want you in my city!”

Mr. Dunn’s lawyer, Sabrina Shroff, declined to comment.

It is extremely unusual for prosecutors to come out of a grand jury without obtaining an indictment because they are in control of the information that grand jurors hear about a case and defendants are not allowed to have their lawyers in the room as evidence is presented.

But Mr. Trump’s decision to flood the streets of Washington with federal agents and military personnel who are generally not trained in conducting routine police stops has resulted in a flurry of defendants being charged with federal crimes that would typically be handled at the local court level, if they were filed at all.

It has also led to an increasing number of embarrassments for federal prosecutors, who have had to dismiss weak cases or reduce the charges that defendants were facing in recent days.

On Monday, for instance, prosecutors refiled a felony assault charge as a misdemeanor in the case of a woman who was accused of injuring an F.B.I. agent during a protest last month against immigration officials at the local jail in Washington.

The charges were reduced against the woman, Sidney Lori Reid, after prosecutors failed not just once but three times to obtain an indictment in the case.

That same day, at the request of prosecutors, a federal magistrate judge dismissed all charges against a man who was arrested at a Trader Joe’s grocery store last week for what the police said was possession of two handguns in his bag.

At a hearing, the magistrate judge, Zia M. Faruqui, lambasted prosecutors for having charged the man, Torez Riley, in an apparent violation of his constitutional rights.

“Lawlessness cannot come from the government,” Judge Faruqui said, according to HuffPost. “We’re pushing the boundaries here.”

Mr. Dunn is scheduled to appear next week in Federal District Court in Washington for a preliminary hearing where another magistrate judge, G. Michael Harvey, will determine if there is probable cause that a crime was committed during the sandwich-throwing incident.

Prosecutors typically have 30 days to secure an indictment after a defendant is arrested. If they fail to do so within that window, they either have to reduce the charges to a misdemeanor or dismiss the case altogether.
 
Prosecutors charge D.C. sandwich thrower with misdemeanor
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Salvador Rizzo
2025-08-29 00:17:48GMT
Federal prosecutors filed a misdemeanor charge Wednesday against a D.C. man who threw a sandwich at a federal officer in protest of President Donald Trump’s law enforcement surge in the city, shifting tactics after a grand jury declined to indict Sean Charles Dunn on a more serious felony count.

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office has failed at least four times this month to persuade grand jurors to indict people who have been accused of assaulting, resisting or impeding federal officers, an extraordinary turn given that grand juries almost always approve indictments. The rare resistance from a body of local citizens shows the limits of Pirro’s strategy of seeking the toughest possible charges for all defendants arrested amid Trump’s crime crackdown.

A prosecutor in Pirro’s office filed a one-page criminal information Wednesday charging Dunn, 37, with a misdemeanor count of assaulting, resisting or impeding a federal officer during the Aug. 10 incident, which was captured on a viral social media video.

U.S. officials said in court filings that Dunn, who worked as a paralegal at the Justice Department before being fired over the sandwich-throwing, berated a group of federal law enforcement officers at a popular nightlife area at the intersection of 14th and U streets NW, calling them fascists, chanting “shame,” telling them to leave the city and ultimately pelting an officer from Customs and Border Protection with a sub.

Dunn was arrested days later at his D.C. apartment in what his attorney, Sabrina Shroff, described in court as a 20-person raid. The White House featured the arrest in a sleek social media video. Pirro took to her X account to jab back after the arrest.

“He thought it was funny. Well, he doesn’t think it’s funny today because we charged him with a felony,” Pirro said. “So there. Stick your Subway sandwich somewhere else!”

The U.S. attorney’s office and Dunn’s attorney did not immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday.

Days before the D.C. grand jury voted Tuesday not to indict Dunn, grand jurors in the same courthouse voted three separate times not to indict Sydney Reid. Prosecutors said an FBI agent injured her hand as Reid rowdily protested a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrest at the doors of the D.C. jail last month. Officials said the man was a gang member.

After the grand jury refused to indict her, Reid was also charged with a misdemeanor violation of assaulting, resisting or impeding a federal officer.

Without the approval of at least 12 grand jurors, prosecutors cannot file felony charges punishable by more than one year in prison. But they are allowed to charge misdemeanor violations, for which the maximum sentence is a year in jail, without grand jury approval.

In the Dunn and Reid cases, a felony conviction would have been punishable by up to eight years in prison, though neither defendant would have been eligible for the maximum.

Asked about Reid’s case at a news conference Tuesday, Pirro declined to speculate about how juries in D.C. might respond to prosecutors requesting indictments as Trump’s intervention continues. “Sometimes a jury will buy it and sometimes they won’t,” she said. “So be it. That’s the way the process works.”
 
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office has failed at least four times this month to persuade grand jurors to indict people who have been accused of assaulting, resisting or impeding federal officers, an extraordinary turn given that grand juries almost always approve indictments. The rare resistance from a body of local citizens shows the limits of Pirro’s strategy of seeking the toughest possible charges for all defendants arrested amid Trump’s crime crackdown.
Sounds like the people aren’t complying
 
At the end of the day we're still a free country and at the end of the day a criminal misdemeanor or minor felony is about the justification for the crime. He threw a sandwich not acid.
One of the duties and sucky part of being a Law enforcement officer is youre going to have to be used to criminals getting off on minor charges for throwing shit at you and you gotta especially if youre a good cop learn to not get baited by these guys.
Sure in the moment shoving a nighstick or baton up the guy's ass feels good but we're american cops your given a gun primarily to stop and kill bad guys. The euros can do the beat the shit put of you for throwing a sandwich shit.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole