The Roblox Erotic Roleplay Community - "Roblox's ERP problem began in the mid 2010's as a quiet whisper. Over the next decade, this whisper would slowly grow into a blood curdling scream, audible from every corner of the platform."

[societyguy01]

This, if anything positive comes out of this, it’s the fact that Gen Alpha will finally play something that isn’t Minecraft,Roblox,or Fortnite

The easiest fix for parents is simply a return to good old fashioned single player games. No need to worry about mentally deranged people online trying to get with your children when selecting from experiences you've vetted beforehand. Why take the risk?

 

[Gamergate Retiree]

"I am not defending the pedo company, but if you go after the pedo company you will end up with ID laws, so don't do it!!!!11"

10/10 sperge out. Go take your pills Nigger.

What? I'm not telling you not to go after the pedo company. I'm telling you that trying to shift the blame for the corruption of children from the parents to the platform who will not do shit unless the state mandates it is how you get the ID laws.

 

[harmy.kook]

I'm saying that companies being liable for the shit on the platforms is how you get the ID laws

Well when your platform, and mainly the moderation team, who are supposed to

expell

pedophiles are openly protecting said pedophiles from mean old "vigilantes" exposing them, yeah I say they are viable to get screwed over.

Also

You are trying to act like me asking a parent to parent

And they are by going after this pedophile-protecting company.

You are trying to solely sweep up for the company through trying to complain about "this leading ID verification" when this has nothing to do with ID verification.

You are trying to sweep for a company that has openly declared it does not like pedophiles being attacked on it's platform.

 

[Goonsmoker]

No, I'm not. I'm saying that companies being liable for the shit on the platforms is how you get the ID laws. Pedophiles can also be awful pieces of shit and should be expelled. You are trying to act like me asking a parent to parent is sympathies with pedophiles which I have to assume is bad faith.

Dude, the website is pretty much a hellmouth of pedophiles and it's most likely operated by pedophiles at this rate, and you're really repeating one of the talking points to deflect from it and/or minimize that is "well, if the parents would parent..." as if that magically absolves Roblox of all criminal liability; after it has made a conscious effort over many years to really present itself as safe for children (which is the point to get people to let their guards down if it is really operated by predators.) Just watch the TechTalk video with that smug bastard CSO looking down on people, so smug and dismissive of the issue and instead trying to redirect into some bullshit "people were going to law enforcement instead of us." Watch the bullshit just spew out of his mouth and his expression and vocal tone the entire time he lies to everyone's faces while he bugs out and the company most likely begins to scrub what they can.

These people operate like they're untouchable and flaunt it, as if the public is at their mercy while they "consider 17 vs 18" on their obviously sexually suggestive spaces such as Public Bathrooms (they are actually refusing to remove the spaces these crimes happen in) and other foot-dragging bullshit. With the way things look, they actively facilitated all of this.

 

[Gamergate Retiree]

Well when your platform, and mainly the moderation team, who are supposed to

pedophiles are openly protecting said pedophiles from mean old "vigilantes" exposing them, yeah I say they are viable to get screwed over.

Also

And they are by going after this pedophile-protecting company.

You are trying to solely sweep up for the company through trying to complain about "this leading ID verification" when this has nothing to do with ID verification.

You are trying to sweep for a company that has openly declared it does not like pedophiles being attacked on it's platform.

I am not sweeping for the company. I want them to get in trouble for this. The ROBLOX thing seems to be a case where yes, the state should step in. There are existing laws on the books that can take care of someone advocating for pedophilia, aren't there? I am ALSO saying that the parents not taking care of their children is reprehensible and should be the first line of defense and not a soulless (or pure evil in this case) corporation. I am ALSO saying that the corporations won't actually do anything unless the state forces them to, because they won't pay the people to moderate it more than they already do. Which makes it difficult for it not to lead to the state intervening.

If there's really no other way for the state to take care of these guys then fuck it. Make it happen because its more important that kids are safe, genuinely.

 

[harmy.kook]

and it's most likely operated by pedophiles at this rate

Yeah like their Head of Safety just being caught with achievements from sex games on Roblox.

But oh boy the company with a several year long reputation of basically protecting pedophiles surely isn't responsible and this is just a ploy to get Digital ID

 

[米津玄師]

I wish that all the A&N tourists can fuck off so whenever I go check on this thread I see occasional updates about how the pedo game made by pedophiles and staffed by pedophiles in order to satisfy pedophiles and facilitate children into getting diddled by pedohiles is about to get assraped instead of 734 more posts sperging about ID laws.

 

[alphabetnigger]

I wish that all the A&N tourists can fuck off so whenever I go check on this thread I see occasional updates about how the pedo game made by pedophiles and staffed by pedophiles in order to satisfy pedophiles and facilitate children into getting diddled by pedohiles is about to get assraped instead of 734 more posts sperging about ID laws.

You got yer kiwi loicense on u m8?

 

[harmy.kook]

I wish that all the A&N tourists

Listen I'm from A&N, but I've been watching Ruben off and on for a year.

I do not know who this is sweeper is, but he's giving off Lolbert vibes because this was going to happen eventually with Roblox because they haven't done anything in years.

And this retarded sweeper is out here trying to push that stupid lie from Chibi Reviews on how "this is actually a ploy to get digital IDs pushed through"

 

[Gamergate Retiree]

Listen I'm from A&N, but I've been watching Ruben off and on for a year.

I do not know who this is sweeper is, but he's giving off Lolbert vibes because this was going to happen eventually with Roblox because they haven't done anything in years.

And this retarded sweeper is out here trying to push that stupid lie from Chibi Reviews on how "this is actually a ploy to get digital IDs pushed through"

Like I said in my last post is there seriously no other way to punish these guys?

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Like I said in my last post is there seriously no other way to punish these guys?

How about you try reading the good faith commentary of various people ITT who discussed options how to protect the kids.

1) Personal liability for the people in charge at the company. Send them to prison for facilitating sexual assault against children
2) Draconic statutory damage awards codified in law for any child molested on their platform

The laws to protect kids already exist, the company and the people simply do not have an incentive to enforce them, and neither is there a regulatory and enforcement agency that does it for them.

Literally nobody has been talking about universal ID requirements.

 

[Gamergate Retiree]

How about you try reading the good faith commentary of various people ITT who discussed options how to protect the kids.

1) Personal liability for the people in charge at the company. Send them to prison for facilitating sexual assault against children
2) Draconic statutory damage awards codified in law for any child molested on their platform

The laws to protect kids already exist, the company and the people simply do not have an incentive to enforce them, and neither is there a regulatory and enforcement agency that does it for them.

Literally nobody has been talking about universal ID requirements.

The reason I was going in hot was because I thought you were saying that you were proposing new law to make companies liable for what happens on their platforms, similarly to killing Section 230 for websites. If that's not what you're saying then yeah, I was just wrong and I'm with you.

 

[harmy.kook]

Like I said in my last post is there seriously no other way to punish these guys?

Well let's see
-They're losing billions in stock value
-They're dealing with not just the case from Louisiana but multiple smaller ones from individual parents where their children got kidnapped or groomed.
-Their head of safety has been exposed for having achievements in sex games on Roblox

But that's bad apparently?
Apparently, them being taken to court and punished for their deliberate and purposeful inaction against serial pedophiles is not ok?

Because it's not the fault of the groomers whose whole MO is to isolate children, but instead the parents who had their children molested or abused because "they just weren't attentive enough and that's what their child deserves"?

 

[Gamergate Retiree]

"they just weren't attentive enough and that's what their child deserves"?

Their child deserves someone else who would actually take care of them and protect them. Asking a company to do it is like asking the dynamite company to not make things that explode, but if it actually works, then I don't have an argument. (and of course, the fact that they're being taken to court is the right thing to happen.)

 

[MetokurGroomedMe]

No, I'm not. I'm saying that companies being liable for the shit on the platforms is how you get the ID laws. Pedophiles can also be awful pieces of shit and should be expelled. You are trying to act like me asking a parent to parent is sympathies with pedophiles which I have to assume is bad faith.

if roblox would simply ban people for behaving as predators do, instead of banning predator catchers and threatening legal action against them, this would not be happening in the first place. there is no need for digital ID over this, and anyone who says there is only wants to implement the digital ID and does not give a fuck about this.

companies don't need to ask for your ID to confirm if you're using their text chats to rizz up chelsea, age 11. they have access to the fucking text, almost certainly unencrypted.

Their child deserves someone else who would actually take care of them and protect them.

what does this have to do with the fact that roblox should ALSO be banning and on the lookout for predators? these two things are not mutually exclusive. if your primary audience is children, you are inherently accepting the idea that you are taking on a role as a temporary, distant protector of the people you intend to market to, in the same way that a food producer is obligated to make sure they're not shipping diseased crops to groceries, and if they do, there are serious consequences for the farm.

do you know how i know it's not necessary to use any kind of digital ID to prevent kids from getting groomed while playing online games? nintendo has had online multiplayer in games (decent multiplayer) since the wii u in 2012. somehow, the wii u and nintendo switch did not turn into diddle central, and even games with ways to communicate between each other were moderated by overzealous nips with trillion-fold steel banhammers that they judiciously used.

 

[Gamergate Retiree]

do you know how i know it's not necessary to do this to prevent kids from getting groomed while playing online games? nintendo has had online multiplayer in games (decent multiplayer) since the wii u in 2012. somehow, the wii u and nintendo switch did not turn into diddle central, and even games with ways to communicate between each other were moderated by overzealous nips with trillion-fold steel banhammers that they judiciously used.

Yeah, i've always been a fan of Nintendo and how they really do seem to want to keep kids safe- if every company did that we'd have a lot less problems with this stuff.

About the stuff you edited in, again, if this can be handled without the government ID shit I'm 100% in favor of it so yeah, I'm sorry for being stupid.

 

[harmy.kook]

Their child deserves someone else who would actually take care of them and protect them.

And parents aren't omnipresent.
Parents are not constantly able to keep an eye on their child.

And for a company that has openly advertised itself as child friendly space for years, talking about how they take it upon themselves to handle pedophiles, have their moderation team openly run defense for pedophiles?

Yeah they're going to get dragged in the courts.

 

[Gamergate Retiree]

Just to put it to bed, I just want to put my logic chain into writing

>parents are not taking care of their kids
>therefore it's now the corporation/company's responsibility
>corporate/company says fuck that
>state needs to intervene
>dinosaurs who don't understand the Internet will just assume it's literally all groomers preying on kids (and there is a fuckton of that, don't get me wrong.)
>they will therefore protect kids by kicking them off the internet, hence digital ID laws to kick them out.

I'll assume this logic doesn't need to reach its conclusion.

 

[meager]

How about you try reading the good faith commentary of various people ITT who discussed options how to protect the kids.

1) Personal liability for the people in charge at the company. Send them to prison for facilitating sexual assault against children
2) Draconic statutory damage awards codified in law for any child molested on their platform

The laws to protect kids already exist, the company and the people simply do not have an incentive to enforce them, and neither is there a regulatory and enforcement agency that does it for them.

Literally nobody has been talking about universal ID requirements.

How exactly would ID requirement laws prevent kids from being groomed on Roblox? I’m starting to feel like it’s becoming a sort of buzzword; something thrown around by both politicians and doomers when child safety is mentioned.

Also, there’s already an age verification system on Roblox. It’s used for things like accessing 17+ games. I’m pretty sure this would be in line with most of the ID laws.

 

[harmy.kook]

>parents are not taking care of their kids

And parents aren't omnipresent.

> the Roblox corporation is currently protecting pedophiles

Ftfy, now get out of here

Roblox has openly declared itself a pedophile safe haven and you're to throw blame at the parents for "not being everywhere at once" by phrasing it as "them abusing their kids."

You are defending a pedophile company by trying to whine about digital ID