US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Did....did the Indian just choose the Russians over the US?

Wyświetl załącznik 7754054
The US and India haven't gotten along for several decades. A defining point was during the Cold War in 1971 when the US gave weapons to Pakistan. If you know anything about tensions in that area of the world at the time, this was a massive scandal to India. The US had this brilliant idea that arming Pakistan would somehow help us fight the Chinese communists. India knew that Pakistan was much more likely to use those weapons on them. Just like every other time the US gives weapons to someone, they don't use them on the people we want them to. They use those weapons to try and settle multi-century grudges with their neighbors. This immediately soured US relations with India, pushed them closer to the USSR, and those relations have truthfully never recovered.

India has never been a friend of the US. We have no real history together. They are not an ally, and they never have been.
 
That is interesting.

Lol.Not happening, but that would be something.

Wyświetl załącznik 7755530
Emory University Shooter Identified: Student Silas Kruger Dead, Officer Killed in Atlanta Incident



Called it
There needs to be a way to keep losers away from weapons without violating 2A. First idea that comes to mind is that if you're ugly or retarded, you aren't considered a person for legal purposes.
 

GOP lawmaker pushes to strip Democrat of committee assignment after saying she’s ‘a proud Guatemalan before I am an American’​


Republican Rep. Carlos Gimenez is introducing a resolution that would remove Illinois Rep. Delia Ramirez from the House Homeland Security Committee, citing recent comments the Democrat made at a summit in Mexico City.

Ramirez, speaking at the Panamerican Congress earlier this month during the chamber’s August recess, said: “I am a proud Guatemalan before I am an American.” The comment drew backlash on social media.

Gimenez told CNN on Friday he was moving to strip his colleague from her committee assignment because he views her conduct as “unbecoming of any member of Congress.” The Florida congressman’s resolution is privileged, meaning it will receive a full vote in the House once lawmakers return in September.



“I was born Cuba and was exiled from my homeland shortly after the Communist takeover. Everything I am, I owe to this exceptional country of limitless opportunities,” Gimenez said in part in a statement.

He added that “when a Member of Congress openly declares allegiance to a foreign nation over the United States, it is not only unacceptable — it is disqualifying for service on a committee tasked with securing our homeland.”

In response to the resolution, Ramirez said she “saw this coming.”

“It’s not normal, but it’s predictable,” the congresswoman told CNN in a statement. “I am the most progressive member of Congress on the Committee on Homeland Security. I speak out and was the first to call for (Homeland Security Secretary Kristi) Noem’s resignation for the many ways she is violating our civil rights and undermining the Constitution.”



Ramirez suggested President Donald Trump’s administration and her Republican colleagues have criticized her “because they hate what I stand for.”

“I represent diversity, I fight for equity, and I demand inclusion,” she said in her statement. “They will use any opportunity to misconstrue what I said and weaponize it to attack me. I have and will continue to use my voice, my heritage, and my experience to defend everyone in America, our Constitution, and our rights.”

Addressing on Monday the blowback she had received for the remark, Ramirez, an American citizen born to Guatemalan immigrants, argued that “honoring (her) Guatemalan ancestry only strengthens (her) commitment to America.”

“No one questions when my white colleagues identify as Irish-American, Italian-American, or Ukrainian-American to honor their ancestry. I’ve consistently expressed pride in my heritage and history - a pride also often reflected in the origin stories of my colleagues,” she said at the time.



Ramirez is not the only Democrat who could be removed from the House Homeland Security Committee in September. GOP Rep. Clay Higgins has introduced a privileged resolution to censure Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver, which would also remove her from the panel.

Republican Rep. Carlos Gimenez is introducing a resolution that would remove Illinois Rep. Delia Ramirez from the House Homeland Security Committee, citing recent comments the Democrat made at a summit in Mexico City.

Ramirez, speaking at the Panamerican Congress earlier this month during the chamber’s August recess, said: “I am a proud Guatemalan before I am an American.” The comment drew backlash on social media.

Gimenez told CNN on Friday he was moving to strip his colleague from her committee assignment because he views her conduct as “unbecoming of any member of Congress.” The Florida congressman’s resolution is privileged, meaning it will receive a full vote in the House once lawmakers return in September.



“I was born Cuba and was exiled from my homeland shortly after the Communist takeover. Everything I am, I owe to this exceptional country of limitless opportunities,” Gimenez said in part in a statement.

He added that “when a Member of Congress openly declares allegiance to a foreign nation over the United States, it is not only unacceptable — it is disqualifying for service on a committee tasked with securing our homeland.”

In response to the resolution, Ramirez said she “saw this coming.”

“It’s not normal, but it’s predictable,” the congresswoman told CNN in a statement. “I am the most progressive member of Congress on the Committee on Homeland Security. I speak out and was the first to call for (Homeland Security Secretary Kristi) Noem’s resignation for the many ways she is violating our civil rights and undermining the Constitution.”



Ramirez suggested President Donald Trump’s administration and her Republican colleagues have criticized her “because they hate what I stand for.”

“I represent diversity, I fight for equity, and I demand inclusion,” she said in her statement. “They will use any opportunity to misconstrue what I said and weaponize it to attack me. I have and will continue to use my voice, my heritage, and my experience to defend everyone in America, our Constitution, and our rights.”

Addressing on Monday the blowback she had received for the remark, Ramirez, an American citizen born to Guatemalan immigrants, argued that “honoring (her) Guatemalan ancestry only strengthens (her) commitment to America.”

“No one questions when my white colleagues identify as Irish-American, Italian-American, or Ukrainian-American to honor their ancestry. I’ve consistently expressed pride in my heritage and history - a pride also often reflected in the origin stories of my colleagues,” she said at the time.



Ramirez is not the only Democrat who could be removed from the House Homeland Security Committee in September. GOP Rep. Clay Higgins has introduced a privileged resolution to censure Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver, which would also remove her from the panel.

 
Addressing on Monday the blowback she had received for the remark, Ramirez, an American citizen born to Guatemalan immigrants, argued that “honoring (her) Guatemalan ancestry only strengthens (her) commitment to America.”

“No one questions when my white colleagues identify as Irish-American, Italian-American, or Ukrainian-American to honor their ancestry. I’ve consistently expressed pride in my heritage and history - a pride also often reflected in the origin stories of my colleagues,” she said at the time.
The difference is Irish-American, Italians (eww)-Americans, and Ukrainians know that America rules, and their countries of family origin are complete shit compared to America.
 
Got it backwards. We gave weapons to Pakistan because India was already aligned with the USSR, being a socialist state and all.
That's why I said it pushed them closer to the USSR. Until we gave weapons to Pakistan, there might have been some chance for diplomacy with India. Relations weren't great, but they weren't awful. Unfortunately, our Department of Defense is genuinely retarded when it comes to stuff like this. They never take into account local grudges before they go and arm one side.

We had the option to just not give military equipment to anyone. It's not like we had to pick between India and Pakistan. We could've just stayed out of it. But the military industrial complex is going to do what it does best, even if it doesn't make sense.
 
Ramirez, speaking at the Panamerican Congress earlier this month during the chamber’s August recess, said: “I am a proud Guatemalan before I am an American.” The comment drew backlash on social media.

The problem is she said she is Guatemalan before she put the ancestory before her home. Go live in Guatemala. Fight for Deversity and Inclusion there.
 
No they don't. Dangerous weapons are ones which pose a risk when operated in their normal capacity. Aka, inherently dangerous. A machine gun is not inherently dangerous. Nitroglycerine is inherently dangerous.
Read the court case. The court made that argument. I pointed out an inconsistency in their timeline as historical context is part of their analysis, Coming up with other dangerous things isn't going to set aside their opinion. Quite the opposite.
 
The difference is Irish-American, Italians (eww)-Americans, and Ukrainians know that America rules, and their countries of family origin are complete shit compared to America.
Pretty sure none of those people ever said they were Irish or Ukrainian first before they were American. Italians aren't White so I have no comment on them.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole