Women are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral app - The surveillance state equivalent of the mean girls burn book

When Cid Walker opens the Tea app, she’s greeted by a barrage of posts about men and their apparent "red" and "green" "flags."

“He’s a cheater,” Walker said, reading some of the comments on one post out loud.

"What clubs does he go to?" another person asked on a different post. "He’s cute."

The app, which appears to have been advertising itself online since at least last fall, allows users to solicit feedback about specific men they’re dating.

Walker, 22, is among the 4 million users on the women-only safety app, which this week became the No. 1 free app in the Apple App Store.

It picked up viral traction in the last month after some people began talking about it online on Reddit and TikTok. The app gained more than 900,000 new signups in the last few days, Tea said on social media. Getting off the waitlist can now take days, an inconvenience many new users complained about in comments on the app's Instagram posts.

Upon opening Tea, users are presented with local men whose photos have been uploaded, along with their first names. For each of the men, other women on the app can report whether they deem him a “red flag” or a “green flag” and leave comments about him, such as those recounting negative date experiences or vouching for him as a friend.

“I’ve seen so many people I know on the app, it’s crazy,” said Walker, a Cleveland-area user who joined the app last week after having seen multiple viral posts about it. “Like, oh my God, I would never think all this stuff about them.”

App users can look up individual names in the search bar or create custom alerts for specific men. The app also offers functions that let users run background checks, search for criminal histories and reverse-search photos to check whether a man is catfishing by using someone else’s photos on his dating profile.

The woman-only app was created by a man, Sean Cook, who said on Tea’s website that he was inspired after he watched his mother’s “terrifying experience with online dating,” including being catfished and unknowingly dating men with criminal records.

Cook’s profile on LinkedIn lists him as the founder of Tea since 2022. The description under his role says, “Tea was self-funded by Sean.”

Cook did not respond to a request for comment. A representative for Tea said the app isn’t offering interviews at this time.

Tea’s mission mirrors similar efforts that have gained popularity in other online forums, such as “Are We Dating The Same Guy?,” a Facebook community with millions of members across the country in localized offshoots.

While the communities have stated that their mission is to keep women safe, they have also faced backlash from men online who say they fear being misrepresented or doxxed on the platforms.

The Facebook groups, which advertise themselves as spaces for women to warn other women about “liars, cheaters, abusers, or anyone who exhibits any type of toxic or dangerous behavior,” have for years been criticized online for devolving into places for gossip or for spreading possible misinformation about people. Last year, judges dismissed two defamation lawsuits filed in Illinois and California by men who were posted in the groups.

With Tea, some men have posted in forums asking for others to report the app in hope of getting it shut down, and others have expressed interest in a men-only equivalent on which they could discuss and mock women.

One app has already tried to offer that. The Teaborn app climbed to No. 3 in the free apps chart Wednesday before it disappeared from the App Store.

Shortly ahead of its removal, the app had rolled out an update with “enhanced content moderation and reporting tools” after its creator condemned users for allegedly sharing revenge porn on the platform.

Teaborn told NBC News in a social media statement: “Apple just removed us yesterday because Tea app doesn’t like competition, but we are working to go back with a new brand!”

Apple didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Despite finding apps like Tea entertaining, users like Walker have expressed discomfort with the idea of allowing so many people to anonymously speak negatively about others online.

Signing up for Tea requires users to take selfies, which the app says are deleted after review, to prove they are women. All users who get accepted are anonymous outside of the usernames they choose. Screenshots are also blocked.

On its website, Tea describes itself as “more than an app; it’s a sisterhood.” The app claims it donates 10% of its profits to the National Domestic Violence Hotline.

A spokesperson for the hotline didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

“Together, we’re redefining modern dating,” the app says.

Walker said that she has noticed many users focus more on gossip than real safety concerns but that she believes some people have found Tea useful for exposing serious issues like abuse.

“I feel like if people were to use the app how it’s supposed to be used, this could actually save a lot of women from being hurt or harmed,” Walker said. “But at this point, I think it’s like a joke to everybody and just like cyberbullying.”



 
This shit basically just vindicates the more sane of the Incels and average guys complaints. I don't think any of these cunts ever heard the phrase "don't throw stones in glass houses.".

I can't help but laugh my ass off at that chick going through chemo. Even when they are literally fucking dying they still have to dunk on some poor loser.
 
It's been a while. What is the accepted response to when an online fox-woman avatar tells you that you're an incel now?

Is it "Are you in the tea list, or too fat to fit in it?"
“Sorry tubby, I’m gonna have to pass” is the proper response to anything these sows have to say.

Said fox avatar woman btw:
kirsche.webp
 
“Sorry tubby, I’m gonna have to pass” is the proper response to anything these sows have to say.

Said fox avatar woman btw:
Wyświetl załącznik 7709826
If that's what she looks like and it *wasn't* the other photo I thought was her... She is fat and I would NOT have sex with her.

Christ man, literally all women have to do is not eat too much and they STILL fuck that up. lmfao
 
If that's what she looks like and it *wasn't* the other photo I thought was her... She is fat and I would NOT have sex with her.

Christ man, literally all women have to do is not eat too much and they STILL fuck that up. lmfao
Truth is though, probably men did fuck her anyway. Difference is they didn't bring her home to mother.
 
Almost everyone who got doxed has been fat and ugly as shit.

I actually think this is one of their reasons the discourse surrounding the leaks has been so hysterical. It really pokes holes in the narrative that feminism is an ideology for normal people and not ugly mentally ill psychos.
It is amazing because you can avoid all this drama simply by only dating attractive women. As if the uggos didn't have enough working agaisnt them already. Now they get to be associated with shit talking and doxxing.
 
It is amazing because you can avoid all this drama simply by only dating attractive women. As if the uggos didn't have enough working agaisnt them already. Now they get to be associated with shit talking and doxxing.
tbf there are a number of attractive women on there. not a lot in comparison but they are on there.
 
This shit basically just vindicates the more sane of the Incels and average guys complaints. I don't think any of these cunts ever heard the phrase "don't throw stones in glass houses.".

I can't help but laugh my ass off at that chick going through chemo. Even when they are literally fucking dying they still have to dunk on some poor loser.

Really doesn't - it's confirmation bias for people too retarded to see these women are just as much of unfuckable losers as them. Normal, healthy people aren't shit flinging in the gender wars.
 
Question: What does the acronym ELO next the pics mean?
Electric Light Orchestra, a 70's band known for their falsetto vocals and their catchy hooks.
This shit basically just vindicates the more sane of the Incels and average guys complaints. I don't think any of these cunts ever heard the phrase "don't throw stones in glass houses.".
The incels aren't wrong about most things (except for the "state-mandated girlfriend, repeal the 18th" types), they're just insufferable assholes about it. Women do live life on easy mode because if they keep in decent enough shape while they're still fertile, they can find a man who would be willing take care of them and provide for their collective offspring (single moms need not apply, men settle for becoming stepdads but every one of us is aware on some level that it's evolutionary cuckholdry). Women have nearly guaranteed access to reproduction because of the way our dating system is stacked, and barring a sitcom-worthy cribswap at the hospital, they always have certainty about their maternity of the child. Men have to prove their worth to a woman to do the nasty, and they have to rely on that woman's fidelity to secure paternity.

Rubbing this in female faces will fall on deaf ears and villify any vaguely pro-male stance. There's nothing that shuts off a woman's listening comprehension faster than being told that she has squandered the opportunity that mother nature granted her, and that she supports a status quo that holds far worse double standards for men. They don't wonder why men don't want to raise another man's child, or why men might want to preemptively weasel out of child support if she has full access to and sole control of her abortion rights, they just know that changing the status quo to be more equitable will inconvenience them, that it will once again hold them accountable for whoring around. They do not want to hear any of that, and the easiest way to shut down discussion of these issues is to say "look at what zero pussy does to a motherfucker".
 
NEVER trust a woman to look like what her dating profile looks like in person. Woman use all sorts of a.i., Faceapp magic, and camera tricks to make themselves look more attractive. I can almost guarantee some of the most attractive ones in the Tea fun leaderboard don't show their full bodies for a reason.

So the eternal male heterosexual question remains. What is more attractive? A fit woman with a plain face, or a gorgeous face with a beached whale body which perhaps two or three of the fit FOIDs could fit inside. *Sub-Saharans ineligible to vote for obvious reasons.
 
I genuinely think the first step to solve the Incel/femcel problem is for everyone to lose weight. Like a lot of weight. Maybe it’s just me but but the average person just doesn’t exist anymore. It’s 10s and cave trolls. There’s no in between. A cave troll can lie to themselves about how they look(“I’m not THAT fat”) but there’s no way around what naturally catches your eye. If someone catches your eye because of the shape of their body, maybe their face isn’t the best in the world but hey, she/he is kind of funny! Then after a couple of dates, you don’t even notice or possibly even grow to like their face. And there you have it. 2 ugly people get married and go on to make 4 ugly babies. But none of that is possible if you don’t have that initial attraction. And NO ONE is initially attracted to a gelatinous blob of flesh bulldozing through the Walmart.
 
Men when they gossip about female lolcows on the freeze peach bastion Kee Wee Farms:
Wyświetl załącznik 7690555

Men when women gossip about them in their NO BOYS ALLOWED clubhouse:
Wyświetl załącznik 7690559
Farms don't pile on women specifically. All cows are equal before the eyes of the kiwi farms law, regardless of gender.

Also, kiwi threads are really funny. Tea people ain't funny.

Kiwis are funny, smart and young at heart. Tea users are ugly and whiny and fet and I would NOT fuck them.
 
That is the founder of the company, (((Sean Cook)))
His picture used to be on the "about" section of the site, but it has since been removed.
Fortunately, the old copies are archvied: https://archive.is/qfMme
This kike is probably full of shit. It's clear that his intent is just to further degrade the already strained relationship between modern day White men and women. The retirement crowd probably has some of the least amount of difficulty dating out of anyone today, most relationships at that point entirely fall into a more natural class-basis and both parties generally have considerable more resources and can better navigate the pitfalls of modern dating that younger-age groups tend to fall into. I highly doubt "avoiding felons" is something that most of the 50+ crowd has to worry about. That is, unless his jewess whore of a mother is trying to "date" younger men. Any man in their 30's or 40's who "dates" (read "has sex with") 50+ year old women is an absolute degenerate and loser, no shit felons and other social rejects would be over-represented in that category, and some retarded app isn't going to fix that.

It's been a while. What is the accepted response to when an online fox-woman avatar tells you that you're an incel now?

Is it "Are you in the tea list, or too fat to fit in it?"
"Incel" is the most meaningless term that the modern day online left has decided to adopt as their go-to insult. Believe in monogamous healthy relationships? You're an incel. Want to get married and have children at a reasonable age? Incel. What ends up not being talked about because of this, is that roughly 1/3 of men (probably closer to 50% since a good number may not admit it) in the younger age demographic meet what should be the actual definition of being an "incel" due to shit like this being foisted upon young women from an early age. This is only going to have growing social consequences in Western countries as time moves forward, and as with every other real issue today, no one is going to address it or attempt to solve the problem.
 
I don't know what pisses me off more; the fact that "the military" is now called "the uniformed services" or the fact that some faggot censored the last 4 digits of this dipshit's SSN.
The Uniformed Services comprise the armed forces, the commissioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the commissioned corps of the Public Health Service. It's been this way since at least 1964; I haven't bothered to look back further.
 
Cant believe I am breaking 5 years of lurking just to say this but it bothered me. It's insane to me that there were posters calling these women average looking. These women are not average looking, they are hideous. Anyone in this thread calling them average is outing themselves as a fugly femcel. Most of the leaked pictures are of 4/10s or lower. Some of them are even the fabled 1/10s, so intensely hideous that the only way they could be uglier is to be a burn victim or have a severe birth defect. Also I am not buying the whole "but ugly people can have a good personality!" argument. From what I have seen, the ugliest women have the most unpleasant personalities on average, and the attractive ones the most pleasant. Seriously, this whole leak is of slanderous cunts, women with objectively shit personalities based on using this app in the first place, and they just happen to all be hideous? It cant just be a coincidence. Not all, like anything there will be outliers, just like how their are black people who are not total retard ghetto niggers, but you would have to be pretty dumb not to see the trend.
 
FYI, here's a magnet link of the 1st data leak. Just under 60 GB of mostly images, selfie & drivers license verifications, chats, and a lot more.
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:brl45s3ysyotj6ljolmtnrlvfmyv4y7s&dn=tea&xl=59368985613&fc=57794

Apparently a 2nd leak was leaked today. Anyone know where I can download it?
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole