Ana Valens / Anastasia Catherine Wythe / Phil Wythe / Philip Stephen Wythe / @SpaceDoctorPhD / @acvalens / @ac_valens - MtF transtrender extraordinaire, formerly a freelance "journalist" for The Daily Dot; but now works for Kotaku, SJW, professional liar and social rouser, CatParty's favorite blogger

"Women should be forced into breeding camps and systematically raped and impregnated"
(Vice sleeps)
"Payment processors shouldn't be given the power to decide what's moral"
(Vice kicks out the tranny)
 
it's actually a good thing that a payment processor is cancelling a degenerate tranny because the vast majority of the time they only use that as a weapon against white people and chuds.
An unjust law applied inconsistently is worse than an unjust law applied fairly and consistently.
While it's legal for payment processors to take steps like these it's a good thing that they apply these measures to troons as well .
 
it's actually a good thing that a payment processor is cancelling a degenerate tranny because the vast majority of the time they only use that as a weapon against white people and chuds.
Payment processors are inherently evil. You don't need payment processors to crush trannies. They were dying out on their own because biologists finally grew a spine and started calling out the pseudoscience behind the tranny shit.
 
It never will be enough. These people are more willing than ever to do this shit because they demand control. They're too engrossed in wanting control that they'll be happy to do everything they can to get it. These companies know they have the power and will flex their muscles for as long as they can (and frankly, I think it'll be a thing forever).
They will flex their muscles as long as it's worth it. There is a situation where it isn't worth it. It's when they're losing cash and people are aware of their tricks, and start talking to lawmakers. They will stop real fucking quickly.
 
To those who continue to say that crushing trannies is more important than fighting off censorship, I just have to say, where were you when the right wing groups were trying to ban violent games in the 2000s? Both flexible conservatives and liberals worked together to turn those people into laughing stocks. It's the only way to win against power.
 
For once, I actually want to hear what Kirshe's reaction to this news will be, because of how badly this faggot fucked with them over voice acting & vtubing as a tranny tourist. The drama should be pretty good.

Kirsche would probably agree that loli shouldn't be banned, and well, I find it difficult to rationalize banning anything that's not irrefutably harmful, if every single lolicon moved on the CP then I'd agree.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Also gained like 10x Bluesky followers, I'll check the archives... nope, Bluesky is weird, he lost a bunch from deactivating.
Yep, this is a quirk of Bluesky that more than one cow has discovered the hard way (e.g. the Beauty Parlor fixture Bex Gerber). If you try to flounce away from Bsky with a temporary deactivation like you used to do on Twitter, it's easy to wind up ditching followers on your account permanently.
 
Yep, this is a quirk of Bluesky that more than one cow has discovered the hard way (e.g. the Beauty Parlor fixture Bex Gerber). If you try to flounce away from Bsky with a temporary deactivation like you used to do on Twitter, it's easy to wind up ditching followers on your account permanently.
I think he's doing something weird with the bsky accounts, and the current acvalens.net is an account only made about a week ago.

On the Twitter side, it looks like he might have actually let the original acvalens account lapse from deactivation to deletion after squatting on it for a few months (Deactivation, and brief reactivations to keep the @ unavailable). He's back on it now, but the join date says July 2025.
 
can we just call people gay and retarded instead of letting payment processors decide who can get money or not?
if you could wave a magic wand sure, but in the current situation, opposing payment processors cancelling valens is basically choosing to live in a world where only white men and chuds get cancelled by payment processors while troons and BIPOC can do almost anything and monetise it with paypall or whatever.
 
if you could wave a magic wand sure, but in the current situation, opposing payment processors cancelling valens is basically choosing to live in a world where only white men and chuds get cancelled by payment processors while troons and BIPOC can do almost anything and monetise it with paypall or whatever.
Sinking to their level just makes you as bad as them though.
 
only white men and chuds get cancelled by payment processors while troons and BIPOC can do almost anything and monetise it with paypall or whatever.
there are moments in time where a jagged alliances are formed.
the Stop killing games thing comes to mind. and that reached its goal last minute. I hate the EU, and trannies, But I hated Mald and AAA companies more.
and so did everyone else. you either fight something big with everyone, or maximum eternal suffering

Either way your ass is getting kicked off the payment processor.
the same people that you're cheering for getting kicked off a payment processor
will cheer when the same is done to you. nothing changes with this.

you'd be stuck in a pattern of
"WHY IS THIS HAPPENING TO ME?" to "HAHAHA IT'S HAPPENING TO YOU"
maximum eternal suffering.
 
I don't care if porn games get axed, but this is also a slippery slope into censoring fps games on steam. I can very well see a future where some payment company says "Trepang is too violent, censor the game or we will make it unable to buy it".
 
you dont have to go full Arch (he defended a queen of spades mod when the nexus oblivion drama was in full swing) with this, its just yet another case of the golem of payment processors turning on its masters once other people realized how you could use it, like when Pornhub got shoah-ed
Payment processor fuckery will eventually move on to other things, but you dont have to go #istandwithanavalens because his work brought nothing of value and will be an easy avenue to point at when arguing for CC processor fuckery, you can verily easily just highlight his violent rape audios


People are already looking into the entire genesis of Collective Shout, and giving Phil almost none of the credit, lmao
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=BQkr-buPXGA
Kirsche would probably agree that loli shouldn't be banned, and well, I find it difficult to rationalize banning anything that's not irrefutably harmful, if every single lolicon moved on the CP then I'd agree.
I've always found this to be a wishy washy libertarian cope, we should just ban it, idgaf about considerations of inherent harm, what if we just used the iron fist of government power to crush loathsome, odious people who contribute virtually nothing to society
 
To those who continue to say that crushing trannies is more important than fighting off censorship, I just have to say, where were you when the right wing groups were trying to ban violent games in the 2000s? Both flexible conservatives and liberals worked together to turn those people into laughing stocks. It's the only way to win against power.

Pretty sure that when it came to violent video games that was a "bipartisan effort" at best with Lieberman (D) being the ringleader in the 1990s. Trying to bring up Jack Thompson as a counterexample to the current zeitgeist is laughable since he was never really taken seriously by anyone and just made a lot of noise without results until he was finally disbarred for his antics.

He only did two real things of note--got The Howard Stern Show taken off the air in Orlando (by October of that year, Stern had signed a contract with Sirius Satellite Radio for an exclusivity contract to take effect 01/01/2006, which would mean that Stern would be gone from over-the-air radio permanently) and helped write a bill in Louisiana that would in effect ban violent video game sales in Louisiana to people under 18, which was phrased as the game appealing to "the minor's morbid interest in violence"...and that was co-authored with state representative Roy Burrell (D) and supported by governor Kathleen Blanco (D). (It was shot down by courts before it was ever put into practice).
 
Pretty sure that when it came to violent video games that was a "bipartisan effort" at best with Lieberman (D) being the ringleader in the 1990s. Trying to bring up Jack Thompson as a counterexample to the current zeitgeist is laughable since he was never really taken seriously by anyone and just made a lot of noise without results until he was finally disbarred for his antics.

He only did two real things of note--got The Howard Stern Show taken off the air in Orlando (by October of that year, Stern had signed a contract with Sirius Satellite Radio for an exclusivity contract to take effect 01/01/2006, which would mean that Stern would be gone from over-the-air radio permanently) and helped write a bill in Louisiana that would in effect ban violent video game sales in Louisiana to people under 18, which was phrased as the game appealing to "the minor's morbid interest in violence"...and that was co-authored with state representative Roy Burrell (D) and supported by governor Kathleen Blanco (D). (It was shot down by courts before it was ever put into practice).
Apparently I don't know shit, because I learned it as the evil Jack Thompson and his cronies (as well as Hillary Clinton for some reason) gunning after games.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole